Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Civilians and Communities II: Coercion and Punishment

View through CrossRef
Having examined the often incomplete cooperation offered to the Irish Republican Army (IRA) by local civilian populations in the previous chapter, this chapter deals with the ways in which the IRA discouraged and punished acts of defiance. Punishment is divided into two main categories: non-lethal and lethal. As the vast majority of deviant acts were ‘minor’, or ‘everyday’, so was the bulk of the punishment meted out. Lethal violence was usually reserved for the more serious offence of passing information to Crown forces, except in the case of women who were almost never the victims of executions or shooting. Women were also less likely to suffer physical violence but could become the victims of ‘gender violence’, acts carried out on the basis of gender but avoiding sexual contact. Overall, punishment was usually selective, discriminate, and designed to match the perceived offence. Often, though, defiance was treated leniently or went unpunished, even in the case of alleged ‘spies and informers’. There are also notable regional variations in both lethal and non-lethal violence, as both often operated in tandem. Just as they influenced defiance, intrinsically local circumstances and dynamics were a key determinant of the nature of punishment.
Liverpool University Press
Title: Civilians and Communities II: Coercion and Punishment
Description:
Having examined the often incomplete cooperation offered to the Irish Republican Army (IRA) by local civilian populations in the previous chapter, this chapter deals with the ways in which the IRA discouraged and punished acts of defiance.
Punishment is divided into two main categories: non-lethal and lethal.
As the vast majority of deviant acts were ‘minor’, or ‘everyday’, so was the bulk of the punishment meted out.
Lethal violence was usually reserved for the more serious offence of passing information to Crown forces, except in the case of women who were almost never the victims of executions or shooting.
Women were also less likely to suffer physical violence but could become the victims of ‘gender violence’, acts carried out on the basis of gender but avoiding sexual contact.
Overall, punishment was usually selective, discriminate, and designed to match the perceived offence.
Often, though, defiance was treated leniently or went unpunished, even in the case of alleged ‘spies and informers’.
There are also notable regional variations in both lethal and non-lethal violence, as both often operated in tandem.
Just as they influenced defiance, intrinsically local circumstances and dynamics were a key determinant of the nature of punishment.

Related Results

GEOSPATIAL ASPECTS OF FINANCIAL CAPACITY OF TERRITORIAL COMMUNITIES OF TERNOPIL REGION
GEOSPATIAL ASPECTS OF FINANCIAL CAPACITY OF TERRITORIAL COMMUNITIES OF TERNOPIL REGION
In the article geospatial aspects of the financial capacity of territorial communities of Ternopil region are described. The need to conduct such a study has been updated, since no...
Early contingency information enhances human punishment sensitivity when punishment is frequent but not rare
Early contingency information enhances human punishment sensitivity when punishment is frequent but not rare
Individuals differ in sensitivity to the adverse consequences of their actions. We have shown that these differences can be linked to differences in correctly learning causal relat...
Outsourcing punishment to karma: Thinking about karma reduces the punishment of transgressors
Outsourcing punishment to karma: Thinking about karma reduces the punishment of transgressors
Punishment and the threat thereof can enforce social norms by deterring inappropriate behaviours and future misdeeds, but enacting punishment can be costly. As a result, individual...
Outsourcing punishment to karma: Thinking about karma reduces the punishment of transgressors
Outsourcing punishment to karma: Thinking about karma reduces the punishment of transgressors
Punishment and the threat thereof can enforce social norms by deterring inappropriate behaviours and future misdeeds, but enacting punishment can be costly. As a result, individual...
Causal inference deficits and integration failure drive stable variation in human punishment sensitivity
Causal inference deficits and integration failure drive stable variation in human punishment sensitivity
Some individuals persist in behaviors that incur harm to themselves or others. While adaptive decision-making requires integrating such punishment feedback to update action selecti...
Sexual Harassment: A Common Sample for the University and the Workplace
Sexual Harassment: A Common Sample for the University and the Workplace
The purpose of the researcher was to investigate sexual harassment, for the same sample of women, in the university and the workplace. The sample consisted of 154 students. The f...
CAN THE DEATH PENALTY STILL BE CONSIDERED A “CRUEL, INHUMANE AND DEGRADING PUNISHMENT” IN THE FACE OF SOUTH AFRICAN PRISON CONDITIONS?
CAN THE DEATH PENALTY STILL BE CONSIDERED A “CRUEL, INHUMANE AND DEGRADING PUNISHMENT” IN THE FACE OF SOUTH AFRICAN PRISON CONDITIONS?
The use of the death penalty as a form of punishment can be traced back to the earliest human civilisations. South Africa was no stranger to this punishment, and it was only abolis...

Back to Top