Javascript must be enabled to continue!
The social relations of power and women’s reproductive self-determination: The research of attitudes of female students at the University of Zagreb
View through CrossRef
Women?s reproductive self-determination is shaped by different social
interests in reproduction as well as by the cultural context: political,
religious, corporate, medical, etc. interests of social actors and
institutions usually limit the autonomy of women and couples in their
reproductive decisions. For many women access to and attitude towards
reproductive methods and techniques, as well as different approaches to
birth, fundamentally influence the course of their lives. In a similar way
the reproductive strategies and techniques deeply affect the cultural ideas
of femininity, motherhood and family. The way women experience control over
their reproductive abilities largely depends on their socio-economic and
cultural circumstances. Socio-cultural norms that define when to become
pregnant and how, what is preferred family size, attitudes towards
infertility, adoption and abortion, what is the appropriate childbearing age
or preferred baby?s gender as well as what constitutes a healthy pregnancy,
fetus and baby mutually shape and are shaped by ideologies of reproduction
and institutional power relations which are in themselves supported by
fundamentally patriarchal social norms. Women?s reproductive activities
(conception, pregnancy and birth) are ranked in accordance to the ?quality
control? of children they may produce. As a consequence, women are being
perceived as either ?good? or ?bad? producer while stigmatizing reproductive
morality is supported by stigmatizing social dimensions of reproductive
technologies. Pregnant women are being observed through the discourse of
?good? and ?bad? women due to their ?good? or ?bad? reproductive bodies in
accordance to the traditional female reproductive social roles. Development
of reproductive technologies coupled with increased role of experts,
different policy-makers and other stake-holders? in women?s reproductive
decision-making opened the space for building a new kind of ?women?s
solidarity? although the female body is still controlled, usurped and
?politically? shaped by different types of power relations and ideologies of
reproductive technologies. This paper has two main goals: 1) to establish a
theoretical template of a conceptual scheme for future empirical studies of
women?s reproductive self-determination in the context of social power
relations, and 2) to present preliminary questionnaire and the results of its
application on the convenience sample of female students at the University of
Zagreb.
Title: The social relations of power and women’s reproductive self-determination: The research of attitudes of female students at the University of Zagreb
Description:
Women?s reproductive self-determination is shaped by different social
interests in reproduction as well as by the cultural context: political,
religious, corporate, medical, etc.
interests of social actors and
institutions usually limit the autonomy of women and couples in their
reproductive decisions.
For many women access to and attitude towards
reproductive methods and techniques, as well as different approaches to
birth, fundamentally influence the course of their lives.
In a similar way
the reproductive strategies and techniques deeply affect the cultural ideas
of femininity, motherhood and family.
The way women experience control over
their reproductive abilities largely depends on their socio-economic and
cultural circumstances.
Socio-cultural norms that define when to become
pregnant and how, what is preferred family size, attitudes towards
infertility, adoption and abortion, what is the appropriate childbearing age
or preferred baby?s gender as well as what constitutes a healthy pregnancy,
fetus and baby mutually shape and are shaped by ideologies of reproduction
and institutional power relations which are in themselves supported by
fundamentally patriarchal social norms.
Women?s reproductive activities
(conception, pregnancy and birth) are ranked in accordance to the ?quality
control? of children they may produce.
As a consequence, women are being
perceived as either ?good? or ?bad? producer while stigmatizing reproductive
morality is supported by stigmatizing social dimensions of reproductive
technologies.
Pregnant women are being observed through the discourse of
?good? and ?bad? women due to their ?good? or ?bad? reproductive bodies in
accordance to the traditional female reproductive social roles.
Development
of reproductive technologies coupled with increased role of experts,
different policy-makers and other stake-holders? in women?s reproductive
decision-making opened the space for building a new kind of ?women?s
solidarity? although the female body is still controlled, usurped and
?politically? shaped by different types of power relations and ideologies of
reproductive technologies.
This paper has two main goals: 1) to establish a
theoretical template of a conceptual scheme for future empirical studies of
women?s reproductive self-determination in the context of social power
relations, and 2) to present preliminary questionnaire and the results of its
application on the convenience sample of female students at the University of
Zagreb.
Related Results
Women in Australian Politics: Maintaining the Rage against the Political Machine
Women in Australian Politics: Maintaining the Rage against the Political Machine
Women in federal politics are under-represented today and always have been. At no time in the history of the federal parliament have women achieved equal representation with men. T...
Deconstructing the Barriers to ASRH in Contemporary Ghana
Deconstructing the Barriers to ASRH in Contemporary Ghana
Adolescent Sexual Reproductive Health (ASRH) is crucial for the physical, emotional, and social well-being of adolescents. The paper aims to identify the barriers to ASRH in Ghana ...
Pregnant Prisoners in Shackles
Pregnant Prisoners in Shackles
Photo by niu niu on Unsplash
ABSTRACT
Shackling prisoners has been implemented as standard procedure when transporting prisoners in labor and during childbirth. This procedure ensu...
The Women Who Don’t Get Counted
The Women Who Don’t Get Counted
Photo by Hédi Benyounes on Unsplash
ABSTRACT
The current incarceration facilities for the growing number of women are depriving expecting mothers of adequate care cruci...
Playing Pregnancy: The Ludification and Gamification of Expectant Motherhood in Smartphone Apps
Playing Pregnancy: The Ludification and Gamification of Expectant Motherhood in Smartphone Apps
IntroductionLike other forms of embodiment, pregnancy has increasingly become subject to representation and interpretation via digital technologies. Pregnancy and the unborn entity...
Is a Fitbit a Diary? Self-Tracking and Autobiography
Is a Fitbit a Diary? Self-Tracking and Autobiography
Data becomes something of a mirror in which people see themselves reflected. (Sorapure 270)In a 2014 essay for The New Yorker, the humourist David Sedaris recounts an obsession spu...
Responsibilised Resilience? Reworking Neoliberal Social Policy Texts
Responsibilised Resilience? Reworking Neoliberal Social Policy Texts
Introduction This essay begins with the premise that resilience, broadly defined as positive adaptation despite adversity (Garmezy and Rutter), and resilience building are importa...
Semiotic Violence
Semiotic Violence
Semiotic violence against female politicians is a subtype of violence against women in politics or VAWP (Krook, 2017), which operates at the level of portrayal and representation o...

