Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Teacher's Non-Verbal Communication In EFL Classroom

View through CrossRef
The objectives of this study were to find out the kinds of teachers nonverbal communication used in EFL classroom, find out the kinds of teacher’s nonverbal communication that male and female students like most and investigate the perceived influence of teacher’s non-verbal communication on students. The research was conducted through descriptive qualitative method involving classroom observation, questionnaire and interview. The subject of the research consisted of two teachers, a male and a female English teacher and 20 students of SMPN 4 Marioriawa. The data gathered had been analyzed through data analysis proposed by Miles and Huberman (1994) namely data reduction, data display and conclusion drawing. The result of this research revealed that there were 8 kinds of nonverbal communication that commonly used by teachers of SMPN 4 Marioriawa namely physical appearance, kinesics, oculesics, vocalics, haptics, proxemics, chronemics and olfactics. Findings also show that there are some differences between the kinds of nonverbal communication that are preferred by male and female students. Those differences can be seen on the students’ perspective on teacher’s physical appearance, chronemics and vocalic. Furthermore, each kind of nonverbal communication has different impact toward students’ learning domains that are cognitive, affective and psychomotor. The proper use of nonverbal communication helps teacher to deliver material easier. Physical appearance, kinesics, vocalics and proxemics can increase student’s cognitive domain. Meanwhile physical appearance, kinesics, oculesic, haptics, chronemics and olfactics can improve students’ affective domain including motivation, enthusiasm and behavior. And proxemics can improve students’ psychomotor domain including skills.     Keywords : EFL Classroom; Male and Female teacher; Nonverbal Communication
Title: Teacher's Non-Verbal Communication In EFL Classroom
Description:
The objectives of this study were to find out the kinds of teachers nonverbal communication used in EFL classroom, find out the kinds of teacher’s nonverbal communication that male and female students like most and investigate the perceived influence of teacher’s non-verbal communication on students.
The research was conducted through descriptive qualitative method involving classroom observation, questionnaire and interview.
The subject of the research consisted of two teachers, a male and a female English teacher and 20 students of SMPN 4 Marioriawa.
The data gathered had been analyzed through data analysis proposed by Miles and Huberman (1994) namely data reduction, data display and conclusion drawing.
The result of this research revealed that there were 8 kinds of nonverbal communication that commonly used by teachers of SMPN 4 Marioriawa namely physical appearance, kinesics, oculesics, vocalics, haptics, proxemics, chronemics and olfactics.
Findings also show that there are some differences between the kinds of nonverbal communication that are preferred by male and female students.
Those differences can be seen on the students’ perspective on teacher’s physical appearance, chronemics and vocalic.
Furthermore, each kind of nonverbal communication has different impact toward students’ learning domains that are cognitive, affective and psychomotor.
The proper use of nonverbal communication helps teacher to deliver material easier.
Physical appearance, kinesics, vocalics and proxemics can increase student’s cognitive domain.
Meanwhile physical appearance, kinesics, oculesic, haptics, chronemics and olfactics can improve students’ affective domain including motivation, enthusiasm and behavior.
And proxemics can improve students’ psychomotor domain including skills.
    Keywords : EFL Classroom; Male and Female teacher; Nonverbal Communication.

Related Results

Teacher-Student Interaction in EFL Classroom in China: Communication Accommodation Theory Perspective
Teacher-Student Interaction in EFL Classroom in China: Communication Accommodation Theory Perspective
Foreign language teaching highlights the cultivation of the learners’ communicative competence, because the main purpose of learning a foreign language is to use the targ...
Teacher Talk in an EFL Classroom: A Pilot Study
Teacher Talk in an EFL Classroom: A Pilot Study
This study explored a non-native English teacher’s teacher talk in an EFL classroom through the qualitative research methodology. The study also aimed to find out the characteristi...
International Perspectives on Standards and Benchmarking in Teacher Education
International Perspectives on Standards and Benchmarking in Teacher Education
Ensuring quality teachers and quality teacher education programmes have been fundamental global concerns over the decades. High quality teachers are critical to the future developm...
Appreciating Students’ Responses: Verbal and Non-Verbal Compliments Used by English Teachers in Classroom
Appreciating Students’ Responses: Verbal and Non-Verbal Compliments Used by English Teachers in Classroom
Many scholars have investigated how teachers interact with students in the ELT classroom, such as teacher talks and teacher reinforcements. This study aims at investigating the ver...
School-Led Programs of Teacher Training in England Versus Northern Europe
School-Led Programs of Teacher Training in England Versus Northern Europe
Models of teacher education that involve close links between teachers in schools and teacher educators in universities have become commonplace, developed in response to changing ed...
Use of Non-verbal Communication in Pedagogic Practices at Public High Schools in Lahore
Use of Non-verbal Communication in Pedagogic Practices at Public High Schools in Lahore
It was a descriptive research which studied the use of non-verbal communication in the pedagogic practices at secondary school level in Lahore. The study was conducted to examine t...

Back to Top