Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Stalin's Decrees and Soviet Trophy Brigades: Compensation, Restitution in Kind, or “Trophies” of War?

View through CrossRef
AbstractThe article is dedicated to the official decrees issued by Joseph Stalin in 1945 ordering the Soviet removal of cultural property from Eastern European and German territories occupied by the Red Army. As opposed to popular belief dominant today in Russia, such decrees were few. Preparation for the removal of cultural property from enemy countries had started before the fate of the war was decided. In 1943 on the request of academician Igor Grabar, the Bureau of Experts was established with the task of composing lists of so-called “eventual equivalents,” which Soviet officials wanted to receive after the war as “restitution in kind,” to compensate for the cultural losses of the USSR. The listed equivalents included art works from museums and private collections in the Axis countries. However, the projected provisions for “restitution in kind” were never approved by the Allies, in large part because during the last months of the war and immediately thereafter, the Soviet Union had already begun massive removal of cultural property from territories occupied by the Red Army. Different trophy brigades sent to the front lines were authorized or ordered to send back home whole collections of German museums and libraries. Only rarely were any of the ‘trophies’ labeled “compensation.”
Title: Stalin's Decrees and Soviet Trophy Brigades: Compensation, Restitution in Kind, or “Trophies” of War?
Description:
AbstractThe article is dedicated to the official decrees issued by Joseph Stalin in 1945 ordering the Soviet removal of cultural property from Eastern European and German territories occupied by the Red Army.
As opposed to popular belief dominant today in Russia, such decrees were few.
Preparation for the removal of cultural property from enemy countries had started before the fate of the war was decided.
In 1943 on the request of academician Igor Grabar, the Bureau of Experts was established with the task of composing lists of so-called “eventual equivalents,” which Soviet officials wanted to receive after the war as “restitution in kind,” to compensate for the cultural losses of the USSR.
The listed equivalents included art works from museums and private collections in the Axis countries.
However, the projected provisions for “restitution in kind” were never approved by the Allies, in large part because during the last months of the war and immediately thereafter, the Soviet Union had already begun massive removal of cultural property from territories occupied by the Red Army.
Different trophy brigades sent to the front lines were authorized or ordered to send back home whole collections of German museums and libraries.
Only rarely were any of the ‘trophies’ labeled “compensation.
”.

Related Results

Soviet Shipbuilding: Productivity improvement Efforts
Soviet Shipbuilding: Productivity improvement Efforts
Constant demand for new naval and commercial vessels has created special conditions for the Government-owned Soviet shipbuilding industry, which practically has not been affected b...
Soviet Union in World War II
Soviet Union in World War II
The Soviet Union in World War II is the story of several wars. When World War II started, the Soviet Union was effectively an ally of Nazi Germany in a relatively conventional Euro...
Whisk of the Red Broom: Stalin & Ukraine, 1928-1933 [PDF, E-Book]
Whisk of the Red Broom: Stalin & Ukraine, 1928-1933 [PDF, E-Book]
Once Joseph Stalin took the lead of the Soviet Bolshevists after the death of Vladimir Lenin, he quickly turned away from Lenin’s New Economic Policy, with its many concessions to ...
Permasalahan Pelaksanaan Restitusi Bagi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Orang
Permasalahan Pelaksanaan Restitusi Bagi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Orang
One of the compensation for Human Trafficking victims in human trafficking law number 21 of 2007 is restitution. Restitution is an effort that made victims of crime can return to t...
Response: Mao and Stalin: Adversaries or Comrades?
Response: Mao and Stalin: Adversaries or Comrades?
In my view, the fundamental disagreement between Garver and me i, the estimation of the nature of the CCP-Moscow relationship, personalized in the relations between Mao and Stalin....
Sino-Soviet Relations, 1949–1991
Sino-Soviet Relations, 1949–1991
Less than three months after the founding of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) in October 1949, Mao Zedong, the chairman of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), arrived in Moscow ...
Yugoslavya-Sovyetler Birliği ya da Tito-Stalin Çatışması (1948)
Yugoslavya-Sovyetler Birliği ya da Tito-Stalin Çatışması (1948)
Öz: Bu çalışmada 1948 yılında Yugoslavya’nın Kominform’dan çıkarılmasının nedenleri ve sonuçları 1945 yılından 1948 yılına kadar yaşanan tarihsel olaylar çerçevesinde anlatılacaktı...
Ecologies of Socialism: Soviet Gradostroitel'stvo and Late Soviet Socialism
Ecologies of Socialism: Soviet Gradostroitel'stvo and Late Soviet Socialism
The most lasting legacy of the Soviet experience, more so than institutions that persist in the Russian Federation today or the mentalities of citizens of post-Soviet states, was i...

Back to Top