Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Using cognitive interviews to improve a measure of organizational readiness for implementation

View through CrossRef
Abstract Background Organizational readiness is a key factor for successful implementation of evidence-based interventions (EBIs), but a valid and reliable measure to assess readiness across contexts and settings is needed. The R = MC2 heuristic posits that organizational readiness stems from an organization’s motivation, capacity to implement a specific innovation, and its general capacity. This paper describes a process used to examine the face and content validity of items in a readiness survey developed to assess organizational readiness (based on R = MC2) among federally qualified health centers (FQHC) implementing colorectal cancer screening (CRCS) EBIs. Methods We conducted 20 cognitive interviews with FQHC staff (clinical and non-clinical) in South Carolina and Texas. Participants were provided a subset of items from the readiness survey to review. A semi-structured interview guide was developed to elicit feedback from participants using “think aloud” and probing techniques. Participants were recruited using a purposive sampling approach and interviews were conducted virtually using Zoom and WebEx. Participants were asked 1) about the relevancy of items, 2) how they interpreted the meaning of items or specific terms, 3) to identify items that were difficult to understand, and 4) how items could be improved. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and coded in ATLAS.ti. Findings were used to revise the readiness survey. Results Key recommendations included reducing the survey length and removing redundant or difficult to understand items. Additionally, participants recommended using consistent terms throughout (e.g., other units/teams vs. departments) the survey and changing pronouns (e.g., people, we) to be more specific (e.g., leadership, staff). Moreover, participants recommended specifying ambiguous terms (e.g., define what “better” means). Conclusion Use of cognitive interviews allowed for an engaged process to refine an existing measure of readiness. The improved and finalized readiness survey can be used to support and improve implementation of CRCS EBIs in the clinic setting and thus reduce the cancer burden and cancer-related health disparities.
Title: Using cognitive interviews to improve a measure of organizational readiness for implementation
Description:
Abstract Background Organizational readiness is a key factor for successful implementation of evidence-based interventions (EBIs), but a valid and reliable measure to assess readiness across contexts and settings is needed.
The R = MC2 heuristic posits that organizational readiness stems from an organization’s motivation, capacity to implement a specific innovation, and its general capacity.
This paper describes a process used to examine the face and content validity of items in a readiness survey developed to assess organizational readiness (based on R = MC2) among federally qualified health centers (FQHC) implementing colorectal cancer screening (CRCS) EBIs.
Methods We conducted 20 cognitive interviews with FQHC staff (clinical and non-clinical) in South Carolina and Texas.
Participants were provided a subset of items from the readiness survey to review.
A semi-structured interview guide was developed to elicit feedback from participants using “think aloud” and probing techniques.
Participants were recruited using a purposive sampling approach and interviews were conducted virtually using Zoom and WebEx.
Participants were asked 1) about the relevancy of items, 2) how they interpreted the meaning of items or specific terms, 3) to identify items that were difficult to understand, and 4) how items could be improved.
Interviews were transcribed verbatim and coded in ATLAS.
ti.
Findings were used to revise the readiness survey.
Results Key recommendations included reducing the survey length and removing redundant or difficult to understand items.
Additionally, participants recommended using consistent terms throughout (e.
g.
, other units/teams vs.
departments) the survey and changing pronouns (e.
g.
, people, we) to be more specific (e.
g.
, leadership, staff).
Moreover, participants recommended specifying ambiguous terms (e.
g.
, define what “better” means).
Conclusion Use of cognitive interviews allowed for an engaged process to refine an existing measure of readiness.
The improved and finalized readiness survey can be used to support and improve implementation of CRCS EBIs in the clinic setting and thus reduce the cancer burden and cancer-related health disparities.

Related Results

Development of a comprehensive measure of organizational readiness (motivation × capacity) for implementation: a study protocol
Development of a comprehensive measure of organizational readiness (motivation × capacity) for implementation: a study protocol
Abstract Background Organizational readiness is important for the implementation of evidence-based interventions. Currently, there is a critical need for a comprehensive, valid, r...
Change or paradox: the double-edged sword effect of organizational crisis on employee behavior
Change or paradox: the double-edged sword effect of organizational crisis on employee behavior
PurposeBased on cognitive appraisal theory of stress, this study develops an integrated model to examine the double-edged sword effect and boundary conditions of the impact of orga...
Organizational Readiness, Behavior, and Public Value Creation in Government Services
Organizational Readiness, Behavior, and Public Value Creation in Government Services
General Background: Public organizations in developing countries face mounting pressures to improve service quality, transparency, and legitimacy. Specific Background: Iraq’s elect...
Organizational readiness for implementation: a qualitative assessment to explain survey responses
Organizational readiness for implementation: a qualitative assessment to explain survey responses
Abstract Background One factor considered essential to successful implementation is organizational readiness. The purpose of this study was to explo...
WOMEN’S BIRTH PREPAREDNESS AND COMPLICATION READINESS IN NIGERIA: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
WOMEN’S BIRTH PREPAREDNESS AND COMPLICATION READINESS IN NIGERIA: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
AbstractIntroductionGlobally, efforts are being made to reduce the menace of maternal death in order to achieve the sustainable development goal. Maternal death has been associated...
Pengaruh Psychological Capital terhadap Readiness For Change pada Karyawan PT. XYZ
Pengaruh Psychological Capital terhadap Readiness For Change pada Karyawan PT. XYZ
Abstract. Employees at PT. XYZ are facing organizational changes that pose various challenges, such as concerns about new tasks, changing organizational culture, and loss of previo...
Readiness for Natural Hazards
Readiness for Natural Hazards
Humankind has always lived with natural hazards and their consequences. While the frequency and intensity of geological processes may have remained relatively stable, population gr...

Back to Top