Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Empirical and Philosophical Reflections on Trust
View through CrossRef
<p>A dominant claim in the philosophical literature on trust is that we should stop thinking in terms of group trustworthiness or appropriate trust in groups. In this paper, we push back against this claim by arguing that philosophical work on trust would benefit from being brought into closer contact with empirical work on the nature of trust. We consider data on reactive attitudes and moral responsibility to adjudicate on different positions in the philosophical literature on trust. An implication of our argument is that the distinction between different kinds of groups—mere groups versus institutional groups—deserves more attention than is currently recognized in the philosophical literature on trust.</p>
<p>In the first section of the paper, we draw some basic philosophical distinctions concerning the nature and kinds of trust. In section two, we present the positions taken by Hawley (<a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-the-american-philosophical-association/article/empirical-and-philosophical-reflections-on-trust/C87EB491FD2BD0CE9C2B64F9871A5A60#ref15" target="_blank">2017</a>), who argues against trust in groups, and Faulkner (<a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-the-american-philosophical-association/article/empirical-and-philosophical-reflections-on-trust/C87EB491FD2BD0CE9C2B64F9871A5A60#ref9" target="_blank">2018</a>), who argues in favor of trust in groups. In section three, we introduce some empirical data and suggest that, albeit tentatively, this looks to undermine Hawley's position and is compatible with Faulkner's approach. We thus suggest, on the basis of the evidence that we have available, that we have reasons to prefer the position taken by Faulkner (<a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-the-american-philosophical-association/article/empirical-and-philosophical-reflections-on-trust/C87EB491FD2BD0CE9C2B64F9871A5A60#ref9" target="_blank">2018</a>) over that taken by Hawley (<a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-the-american-philosophical-association/article/empirical-and-philosophical-reflections-on-trust/C87EB491FD2BD0CE9C2B64F9871A5A60#ref15" target="_blank">2017</a>). We end by discussing some implications for distinctions between different kinds of groups relevant for future philosophical work on trust.</p>
Title: Empirical and Philosophical Reflections on Trust
Description:
<p>A dominant claim in the philosophical literature on trust is that we should stop thinking in terms of group trustworthiness or appropriate trust in groups.
In this paper, we push back against this claim by arguing that philosophical work on trust would benefit from being brought into closer contact with empirical work on the nature of trust.
We consider data on reactive attitudes and moral responsibility to adjudicate on different positions in the philosophical literature on trust.
An implication of our argument is that the distinction between different kinds of groups—mere groups versus institutional groups—deserves more attention than is currently recognized in the philosophical literature on trust.
</p>
<p>In the first section of the paper, we draw some basic philosophical distinctions concerning the nature and kinds of trust.
In section two, we present the positions taken by Hawley (<a href="https://www.
cambridge.
org/core/journals/journal-of-the-american-philosophical-association/article/empirical-and-philosophical-reflections-on-trust/C87EB491FD2BD0CE9C2B64F9871A5A60#ref15" target="_blank">2017</a>), who argues against trust in groups, and Faulkner (<a href="https://www.
cambridge.
org/core/journals/journal-of-the-american-philosophical-association/article/empirical-and-philosophical-reflections-on-trust/C87EB491FD2BD0CE9C2B64F9871A5A60#ref9" target="_blank">2018</a>), who argues in favor of trust in groups.
In section three, we introduce some empirical data and suggest that, albeit tentatively, this looks to undermine Hawley's position and is compatible with Faulkner's approach.
We thus suggest, on the basis of the evidence that we have available, that we have reasons to prefer the position taken by Faulkner (<a href="https://www.
cambridge.
org/core/journals/journal-of-the-american-philosophical-association/article/empirical-and-philosophical-reflections-on-trust/C87EB491FD2BD0CE9C2B64F9871A5A60#ref9" target="_blank">2018</a>) over that taken by Hawley (<a href="https://www.
cambridge.
org/core/journals/journal-of-the-american-philosophical-association/article/empirical-and-philosophical-reflections-on-trust/C87EB491FD2BD0CE9C2B64F9871A5A60#ref15" target="_blank">2017</a>).
We end by discussing some implications for distinctions between different kinds of groups relevant for future philosophical work on trust.
</p>.
Related Results
Empirical and Philosophical Reflections on Trust
Empirical and Philosophical Reflections on Trust
<p>A dominant claim in the philosophical literature on trust is that we should stop thinking in terms of group trustworthiness or appropriate trust in groups. In this paper, ...
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash
Abstract
This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
Banking system trust, bank trust, and bank loyalty
Banking system trust, bank trust, and bank loyalty
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to test a model of banking system trust as an antecedent of bank trust and bank loyalty. Six determinants of trust and loyalty are included: co...
Measuring trust in supply chain partners' relationships
Measuring trust in supply chain partners' relationships
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to develop a context dependent, multi perspective multilevel trust measurement instrument to measure supply chain members' trust.Design/methodol...
Trust and Distrust in E-Commerce
Trust and Distrust in E-Commerce
Trust is the key ingredient for sustainable transactions. In the concept of trust, the trustor trusts the trustees. In e-commerce, the trustor is the buyer and the trustees are the...
Mechanistic analysis of the evolution of trust level between owner and PMC contractor based on dynamic Bayesian network
Mechanistic analysis of the evolution of trust level between owner and PMC contractor based on dynamic Bayesian network
Abstract
The PMC project advocates a non-confrontational cooperation model. As an extension of the owner, the PMC contractor manages the project in all aspects and processe...
The tendency to trust as individual predisposition – exploring the associations between interpersonal trust, trust in the media and trust in institutions
The tendency to trust as individual predisposition – exploring the associations between interpersonal trust, trust in the media and trust in institutions
AbstractTrust in the media has become an increasingly important issue in communication research. Traditional credibility research and modern media skepticism studies have bred a mu...
How commitment affects trust in communication: coordination, confidence and evidence
How commitment affects trust in communication: coordination, confidence and evidence
Given the risks of defection and misinformation, humans have evolved mechanisms of strategic vigilance to evaluate speakers’ disposition to be good partners (Heintz et al., 2016) a...

