Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

The experiences of medical students, residents, fellows, and attendings in the emergency department: Implicit bias to microaggressions

View through CrossRef
AbstractObjectivesMicroaggressions and implicit bias occur frequently in medicine. No previous study, however, has examined the implicit bias and microaggressions that emergency medicine (EM) providers experience. Our primary objective was to understand how often EM providers experience implicit bias and microaggressions. Our secondary objective was to evaluate the types of microaggressions they experience and whether their own identifying characteristics are risk factors.MethodsA questionnaire was administered to EM providers across the United States. Outcome measures of experiencing or witnessing a microaggression, overt discrimination, or implicit bias were described using frequencies, proportions, and logistic regressions. Where a univariate association between outcome measures and demographic characteristics was found, multivariate regression to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) was performed. Proportional odds logistic regression models were used to evaluate the specific type of microaggressions experienced and if there was an association with demographic variables.ResultsA total of 277 medical providers (48% trainees—medical students, residents, and fellows—and 52% attending physicians) completed the survey. A total of 181 (65%) respondents reported experiencing a microaggression. Female (OR = 5.9 [95% CI = 3.1 to 11.2]) and non‐White respondents (OR = 2.4 [95% CI = 1.2 to 4.5]) were more likely to report experiencing any microaggression. Misidentification, the most common form of microaggression, was more common with trainees compared to attending physicians (proportional OR [POR] = 2.6 [95% CI = 1.7 to 4.0]) and non‐White, compared to White, respondents (POR = 2.2 [95% CI = 1.3 to 3.6]). Misidentification as nonclinician staff was associated with gender (POR = 53 [95% CI = 24 to 116]) and 52% of female respondents reported being mistaken for nonclinician staff almost daily. Seventy‐six percent of respondents reported being called a vulgar term by a patient and 21% by a staff member.ConclusionsEM providers, particularly women and non‐Whites, who responded to our survey experienced and witnessed bias and microaggressions, most commonly misidentification, in the ED.
Title: The experiences of medical students, residents, fellows, and attendings in the emergency department: Implicit bias to microaggressions
Description:
AbstractObjectivesMicroaggressions and implicit bias occur frequently in medicine.
No previous study, however, has examined the implicit bias and microaggressions that emergency medicine (EM) providers experience.
Our primary objective was to understand how often EM providers experience implicit bias and microaggressions.
Our secondary objective was to evaluate the types of microaggressions they experience and whether their own identifying characteristics are risk factors.
MethodsA questionnaire was administered to EM providers across the United States.
Outcome measures of experiencing or witnessing a microaggression, overt discrimination, or implicit bias were described using frequencies, proportions, and logistic regressions.
Where a univariate association between outcome measures and demographic characteristics was found, multivariate regression to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) was performed.
Proportional odds logistic regression models were used to evaluate the specific type of microaggressions experienced and if there was an association with demographic variables.
ResultsA total of 277 medical providers (48% trainees—medical students, residents, and fellows—and 52% attending physicians) completed the survey.
A total of 181 (65%) respondents reported experiencing a microaggression.
Female (OR = 5.
9 [95% CI = 3.
1 to 11.
2]) and non‐White respondents (OR = 2.
4 [95% CI = 1.
2 to 4.
5]) were more likely to report experiencing any microaggression.
Misidentification, the most common form of microaggression, was more common with trainees compared to attending physicians (proportional OR [POR] = 2.
6 [95% CI = 1.
7 to 4.
0]) and non‐White, compared to White, respondents (POR = 2.
2 [95% CI = 1.
3 to 3.
6]).
Misidentification as nonclinician staff was associated with gender (POR = 53 [95% CI = 24 to 116]) and 52% of female respondents reported being mistaken for nonclinician staff almost daily.
Seventy‐six percent of respondents reported being called a vulgar term by a patient and 21% by a staff member.
ConclusionsEM providers, particularly women and non‐Whites, who responded to our survey experienced and witnessed bias and microaggressions, most commonly misidentification, in the ED.

Related Results

Racial Microaggressions in Healthcare Settings: A Scoping Review
Racial Microaggressions in Healthcare Settings: A Scoping Review
AimsRacial microaggressions occur when subtle or often automatic exchanges of aversive and covert racism are directed towards people identifying as racialized groups. Consequently,...
Microaggressions Reconsidered
Microaggressions Reconsidered
Abstract In response to the problems of an act-based account of microaggressions discussed in Chapter 2, Chapter 3 advances a revised account: the harm-based account...
After Pierce and Sue: A Revised Racial Microaggressions Taxonomy
After Pierce and Sue: A Revised Racial Microaggressions Taxonomy
Harvard psychiatrist Chester Pierce’s conception of “subtle and stunning” daily racial offenses, or microaggressions, remains salient even 50 years after it was introduced. Microag...
Microaggressions
Microaggressions
Abstract This chapter provides a history of microaggressions. The term was coined in 1970 by a Black Harvard psychologist, Chester Pierce, to describe the “subtle bl...
Emotional Microaggressions
Emotional Microaggressions
Abstract This chapter provides an overview and analysis of emotional microaggressions. In medical contexts, emotional microaggressions occur when healthcare professi...
Epistemic Microaggressions
Epistemic Microaggressions
Abstract This chapter provides an overview and analysis of epistemic microaggressions. In medical contexts, epistemic microaggressions are intentional or unintention...

Back to Top