Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Epistemically Proper Belief
View through CrossRef
This chapter argues that the sort of normativity that is at the heart of epistemology is the sort of normativity involved in assessments of whether a subject’s belief satisfies the distinctly epistemic standards on knowledge. It introduces the term ‘epistemically proper’ to designate the status a belief has when it satisfies these standards. The author argues against the view that nothing short of knowledge itself can provide the standards, and proceeds to argue for the view that the theory of epistemic justification is in the business of articulating the relevant standards. Appealing to his construal of the internalism/externalism dispute in the theory of justification, the author concludes by motivating a desideratum on any such account: it should regard epistemic propriety as involving both a reliability dimension and a responsibilist dimension.
Title: Epistemically Proper Belief
Description:
This chapter argues that the sort of normativity that is at the heart of epistemology is the sort of normativity involved in assessments of whether a subject’s belief satisfies the distinctly epistemic standards on knowledge.
It introduces the term ‘epistemically proper’ to designate the status a belief has when it satisfies these standards.
The author argues against the view that nothing short of knowledge itself can provide the standards, and proceeds to argue for the view that the theory of epistemic justification is in the business of articulating the relevant standards.
Appealing to his construal of the internalism/externalism dispute in the theory of justification, the author concludes by motivating a desideratum on any such account: it should regard epistemic propriety as involving both a reliability dimension and a responsibilist dimension.
Related Results
Why Only Evidential Considerations Can Justify Belief
Why Only Evidential Considerations Can Justify Belief
At least when we restrict our attention to the epistemic domain, it seems clear that only considerations which bear on whether p can render a subject’s belief that p epistemically ...
Belief as Emotion
Belief as Emotion
Abstract
Belief as Emotion argues that belief is a type of emotion, where emotions are understood as irreducibly blended states that transcend the cognitive/non-cogn...
Belief, Imagination, and Delusion
Belief, Imagination, and Delusion
Abstract
This volume brings together recent work on the nature of belief, imagination, and delusion. Whilst philosophers of mind and epistemology employ notions of b...
Belief Self-Knowledge
Belief Self-Knowledge
A fundamental puzzle about self-knowledge is this: spontaneous, unreflective self-attributions of beliefs and other mental states (avowals) appear to be at once epistemically groun...
Epistemic Free Riding
Epistemic Free Riding
Free riding occurs in the practical domain when some action is rational for each group member to perform but such that when everyone performs that action, it is worse overall for e...
Non-Ideal Epistemology
Non-Ideal Epistemology
Abstract
Epistemologists often work with idealized pictures of what inquirers are like, how they interact with each other, and the social institutions and environ...
Plato on the Individual, Polis and Political Authority in Republic
Plato on the Individual, Polis and Political Authority in Republic
Offering an in-depth examination of the political philosophy of Plato’sRepublic, Stephen O. Peprah challenges the prevalent scholarly interpretation that misreads and underestimate...
Rationality and Belief
Rationality and Belief
Abstract
This book gives a general theory of rational belief. Although it can be read by itself, it is a sequel to the author’s previous book, The Value of Rationali...

