Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Good, theories of the

View through CrossRef
‘Good’ is the most general term of positive evaluation, used to recommend or express approval in a wide range of contexts. It indicates that a thing is desirable or worthy of choice, so that normally, if you have reason to want a certain kind of thing, you also have reason to prefer a good thing of that kind. A theory of the good may consist in a general account of the good, which is meant to apply to all good things; or in a definition of ‘good’, an account of how the term functions in the language. Theories of the good have metaphysical implications about the relations of fact and value. Many ancient and medieval philosophers believed in the ultimate identity of the real and the good. Modern philosophers reject this identification, and have held a range of positions: realists, for example, hold that the good is part of reality, while certain moral sense theorists hold that when we call something good we are projecting human interests onto reality; and emotivists hold that we use the term ‘good’ only to signify subjective approval. Theorists of the good also categorize different kinds of goodness and explain how they are related. Good things are standardly classified as ends, which are valued for their own sakes, or means, valued for the sake of the ends they promote. Some philosophers also divide them into intrinsic goods, which have their value in themselves, and extrinsic goods, which get their value from their relation to something else. Various theories have been held about the relation between these two distinctions – about whether an end must be something with intrinsic value. Philosophers also distinguish subjective goods – things which are good for someone in particular – from objective goods, which are good from everyone’s point of view. Views about how these kinds of goodness are related have important implications for moral philosophy. Usually, a theory of the good is constructed in the hope of shedding light on more substantive questions, such as what makes a person, an action, or a human life good. These questions raise issues about the relation between ethical and other values. For example, we may ask whether moral virtue is a special sort of goodness, or just the ordinary sort applied to persons. Or, since actions are valued as ‘right’ or ‘wrong’, we may ask how these values are related to the action’s goodness or badness. We may also pose the question of whether a life that is good in the sense of being happy must also be a morally good or virtuous life. This last question has occupied the attention of philosophers ever since Plato.
Title: Good, theories of the
Description:
‘Good’ is the most general term of positive evaluation, used to recommend or express approval in a wide range of contexts.
It indicates that a thing is desirable or worthy of choice, so that normally, if you have reason to want a certain kind of thing, you also have reason to prefer a good thing of that kind.
A theory of the good may consist in a general account of the good, which is meant to apply to all good things; or in a definition of ‘good’, an account of how the term functions in the language.
Theories of the good have metaphysical implications about the relations of fact and value.
Many ancient and medieval philosophers believed in the ultimate identity of the real and the good.
Modern philosophers reject this identification, and have held a range of positions: realists, for example, hold that the good is part of reality, while certain moral sense theorists hold that when we call something good we are projecting human interests onto reality; and emotivists hold that we use the term ‘good’ only to signify subjective approval.
Theorists of the good also categorize different kinds of goodness and explain how they are related.
Good things are standardly classified as ends, which are valued for their own sakes, or means, valued for the sake of the ends they promote.
Some philosophers also divide them into intrinsic goods, which have their value in themselves, and extrinsic goods, which get their value from their relation to something else.
Various theories have been held about the relation between these two distinctions – about whether an end must be something with intrinsic value.
Philosophers also distinguish subjective goods – things which are good for someone in particular – from objective goods, which are good from everyone’s point of view.
Views about how these kinds of goodness are related have important implications for moral philosophy.
Usually, a theory of the good is constructed in the hope of shedding light on more substantive questions, such as what makes a person, an action, or a human life good.
These questions raise issues about the relation between ethical and other values.
For example, we may ask whether moral virtue is a special sort of goodness, or just the ordinary sort applied to persons.
Or, since actions are valued as ‘right’ or ‘wrong’, we may ask how these values are related to the action’s goodness or badness.
We may also pose the question of whether a life that is good in the sense of being happy must also be a morally good or virtuous life.
This last question has occupied the attention of philosophers ever since Plato.

Related Results

Psychobiological Theories of Smoking and Smoking Motivation
Psychobiological Theories of Smoking and Smoking Motivation
Abstract. Theories of smoking have been developed about the conditions and causes of smoking as well as for explaining its maintenance. Moreover, factors of smoking motivation have...
A Critique of Principlism
A Critique of Principlism
Photo by Towfiqu barbhuiya on Unsplash INTRODUCTION Bioethics does not have an explicitly stated and agreed upon means of resolving conflicts between normative theories. As such, b...
Psychological Theories of Autism: Everything, All at Once, In One Place
Psychological Theories of Autism: Everything, All at Once, In One Place
The goal of this work is to collect psychological causal theories of autism, to review them critically in terms of the strength of their constructs, premises and potential explanat...
Theoretical Backbone of Library and Information Science: A Quest
Theoretical Backbone of Library and Information Science: A Quest
This study primarily aims to identify unique theories and specific uses of theories in the library and information science (LIS) domain. It provides a comprehensive list of the the...
Pet Euthanasia and Human Euthanasia
Pet Euthanasia and Human Euthanasia
Photo ID 213552852 © Yuryz | Dreamstime.com Abstract A criticism of assisted death is that it’s contrary to the Hippocratic Oath. This opposition to assisted death assumes that dea...
The Infrared Physics of Bad Theories
The Infrared Physics of Bad Theories
We study the complete moduli space of vacua of 3d \mathcal{N}=4????=4U(N)U(N) SQCD theories with N_fNf fundamentals, building on the algebraic description of the Coulomb branch, an...
Theories of Democracy
Theories of Democracy
This chapter develops a taxonomy of theories of democracy that maps the extent to which they rely on the judgment of citizens. It aims to achieve two things. First, it sorts the va...
The True or the Artificial: Theories on Human Nature before Mencius and Xunzi—Based on “Sheng is from Ming, and Ming is from Tian”
The True or the Artificial: Theories on Human Nature before Mencius and Xunzi—Based on “Sheng is from Ming, and Ming is from Tian”
When speaking of pre-Qin Dynasty theories on human nature, past scholars divided Confucius, Mencius and Xunzi into three categories, and they tended to divide the theories into mor...

Back to Top