Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Can Microfluidics Improve Sperm Quality? A Prospective Functional Study
View through CrossRef
The same sperm selection techniques in assisted reproduction clinics have remained largely unchanged despite their weaknesses. Recently, microfluidic devices have emerged as a novel methodology that facilitates the sperm selection process with promising results. A prospective case-control study was conducted in two phases: 100 samples were used to compare the microfluidic device with Density Gradient, and another 100 samples were used to compare the device with the Swim-up. In the initial phase, a significant enhancement in progressive motility, total progressive motile sperm count, vitality, morphology, and sperm DNA fragmentation were obtained for the microfluidic group compared to Density Gradient. Nevertheless, no statistically significant differences were observed in sperm concentration and chromatin structure stability. In the subsequent phase, the microfluidic group exhibited significant increases in sperm concentration, total progressive motile sperm count, and vitality compared to Swim-up. However, non-significant differences were seen for progressive motility, morphology, DNA structure stability, and DNA fragmentation. Similar trends were observed when results were stratified into quartiles. In conclusion, in a comparison of microfluidics with standard techniques, an improvement in sperm quality parameters was observed for the microfluidic group. However, this improvement was not significant for all parameters.
Title: Can Microfluidics Improve Sperm Quality? A Prospective Functional Study
Description:
The same sperm selection techniques in assisted reproduction clinics have remained largely unchanged despite their weaknesses.
Recently, microfluidic devices have emerged as a novel methodology that facilitates the sperm selection process with promising results.
A prospective case-control study was conducted in two phases: 100 samples were used to compare the microfluidic device with Density Gradient, and another 100 samples were used to compare the device with the Swim-up.
In the initial phase, a significant enhancement in progressive motility, total progressive motile sperm count, vitality, morphology, and sperm DNA fragmentation were obtained for the microfluidic group compared to Density Gradient.
Nevertheless, no statistically significant differences were observed in sperm concentration and chromatin structure stability.
In the subsequent phase, the microfluidic group exhibited significant increases in sperm concentration, total progressive motile sperm count, and vitality compared to Swim-up.
However, non-significant differences were seen for progressive motility, morphology, DNA structure stability, and DNA fragmentation.
Similar trends were observed when results were stratified into quartiles.
In conclusion, in a comparison of microfluidics with standard techniques, an improvement in sperm quality parameters was observed for the microfluidic group.
However, this improvement was not significant for all parameters.
Related Results
P-061 In situ microfluidics of fluidic walls: a novel deviceless and cost-effective approach for sperm selection in the same ICSI-dish
P-061 In situ microfluidics of fluidic walls: a novel deviceless and cost-effective approach for sperm selection in the same ICSI-dish
Abstract
Study question
Is our novel deviceless method based on in-situ microfluidics a valuable strategy to select suitable spe...
P-046 Effect of different sperm chromatin dispersion type on IVF/ICSI outcome and offspring profile
P-046 Effect of different sperm chromatin dispersion type on IVF/ICSI outcome and offspring profile
Abstract
Study question
Whether the percentage of different sperm chromatin dispersion type are associated with the IVF/ICSI out...
P–025 Sperm selection using a modified “swim up” technique in absence of sperm centrifugation improve sperm DNA fragmentation and decreases miscarriage rate
P–025 Sperm selection using a modified “swim up” technique in absence of sperm centrifugation improve sperm DNA fragmentation and decreases miscarriage rate
Abstract
Study question
Is it useful to avoid sperm centrifugation in laboratory routine work to improve sperm quality and repro...
P-103 Sperm selection for ICSI by rheotaxis and thermotaxis in In-Situ handmade microfluidics of fluidic walls: preliminary results of a Randomized Controlled Trial
P-103 Sperm selection for ICSI by rheotaxis and thermotaxis in In-Situ handmade microfluidics of fluidic walls: preliminary results of a Randomized Controlled Trial
Abstract
Study question
Does sperm selection by rheotaxis and thermotaxis in In-Situ handmade microfluidics of fluidic walls opt...
P-227 ICSI outcomes after using in-situ microfluidics of fluidic walls versus DGC: a prospective non-inferiority comparative pilot study in sibling oocytes
P-227 ICSI outcomes after using in-situ microfluidics of fluidic walls versus DGC: a prospective non-inferiority comparative pilot study in sibling oocytes
Abstract
Study question
Does the novel strategy in-situ microfluidics (isM) yield comparable ICSI outcomes to the control sperm ...
P-072 Fresh testicular sperm seems to yield more fertilization abnormalities and early pregnancy loss than frozen testicular sperm
P-072 Fresh testicular sperm seems to yield more fertilization abnormalities and early pregnancy loss than frozen testicular sperm
Abstract
Study question
How do ICSI outcomes using fresh testicular sperm, compare to those using frozen samples cryopreserved f...
P-051 Male cancer patient sperm cryopreservation for fertility preservation: 11-year multicenter experience: 16 regions of the mainland China national sperm
P-051 Male cancer patient sperm cryopreservation for fertility preservation: 11-year multicenter experience: 16 regions of the mainland China national sperm
Abstract
Study question
What is the current status of fertility preservation (FP) of male cancer utilization, efficacy and safet...
Sauger testicular harvest eliminates sperm limitation during large-scale saugeye (Walleye × Sauger) production
Sauger testicular harvest eliminates sperm limitation during large-scale saugeye (Walleye × Sauger) production
Abstract
Objective
Poor milt yield via strip-spawning in male Sauger Sander canadensis limits the production of saugeye (female ...

