Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Malthus, Jesus, and Darwin
View through CrossRef
Malthus' theological ideas were most clearly presented in the final two chapters of the first edition (1798) of his Essay on the Principle of Population. They can be classified under eight main headings. (i) He admitted that the pressure of population causes much misery and evil, but he did not accept that this in any way impugned the benevolence of the Creator. He situated the population problem within the general context of the problem of evil, and argued that population pressure is permitted and ordained by the Creator as a means of stimulating mankind to attain a higher good. (ii) He opposed the traditional Christian notion that this world is a state of trial, with population pressure being one aspect of that trial. He believed that this notion of a state of trial is inconsistent with the notion of an omniscient Creator, and that it is therefore necessary to reject the notion of a state of trial in order to save the notion of Divine omniscience. (iii) Instead of viewing this world as a state of trial, he viewed it ‘as the mighty process of God, not for the trial, but for the creation and formation of mindr. This notion of the growth of mind is the central aspect of Malthus' theology. (iv) He expressed doubts about the omnipotence of the Creator, arguing that God did not have the power to create perfect human beings instantaneously, but required a certain process or a certain time to form beings with ‘exalted qualities of mind’. Malthus seemed to argue that Divine omnipotence and Divine benevolence are incompatible – because a truly benevolent creator would not have subjected mankind to the miseries of this world if He had the power to create a perfect world. Malthus was prepared to sacrifice the notion of Divine omnipotence in order to save the notion of Divine benevolence. (v) He saw the principle of population as part of the Divine plan for the replenishment of the earth, i.e. its full cultivation and peopling. (vi) His attitude to worldly pleasures and comforts was distinctly unpuritanical, and leaning towards hedonism. His ethics were world-enhancing, rather than world-denying and retreatist. (This point is discussed more fully in Part II below.) (vii) He gave a naturalistic interpretation of the Biblical doctrine of original sin, describing original sin as the original state of torpor and sluggishness of every human being at the moment of birth. The purpose of the principle of population, and of the other difficulties encountered in life, is to stimulate man to raise himself out of this original state. (viii) Finally, Malthus' theology included the doctrine of annihilationism (or conditional immortality), according to which eternal life is not an essential part of the human soul at birth, but is granted only to those who attain during life on earth an adequate growth of mind. The others are, at death, not condemned to eternal suffering, but are annihilated, body and soul.
Title: Malthus, Jesus, and Darwin
Description:
Malthus' theological ideas were most clearly presented in the final two chapters of the first edition (1798) of his Essay on the Principle of Population.
They can be classified under eight main headings.
(i) He admitted that the pressure of population causes much misery and evil, but he did not accept that this in any way impugned the benevolence of the Creator.
He situated the population problem within the general context of the problem of evil, and argued that population pressure is permitted and ordained by the Creator as a means of stimulating mankind to attain a higher good.
(ii) He opposed the traditional Christian notion that this world is a state of trial, with population pressure being one aspect of that trial.
He believed that this notion of a state of trial is inconsistent with the notion of an omniscient Creator, and that it is therefore necessary to reject the notion of a state of trial in order to save the notion of Divine omniscience.
(iii) Instead of viewing this world as a state of trial, he viewed it ‘as the mighty process of God, not for the trial, but for the creation and formation of mindr.
This notion of the growth of mind is the central aspect of Malthus' theology.
(iv) He expressed doubts about the omnipotence of the Creator, arguing that God did not have the power to create perfect human beings instantaneously, but required a certain process or a certain time to form beings with ‘exalted qualities of mind’.
Malthus seemed to argue that Divine omnipotence and Divine benevolence are incompatible – because a truly benevolent creator would not have subjected mankind to the miseries of this world if He had the power to create a perfect world.
Malthus was prepared to sacrifice the notion of Divine omnipotence in order to save the notion of Divine benevolence.
(v) He saw the principle of population as part of the Divine plan for the replenishment of the earth, i.
e.
its full cultivation and peopling.
(vi) His attitude to worldly pleasures and comforts was distinctly unpuritanical, and leaning towards hedonism.
His ethics were world-enhancing, rather than world-denying and retreatist.
(This point is discussed more fully in Part II below.
) (vii) He gave a naturalistic interpretation of the Biblical doctrine of original sin, describing original sin as the original state of torpor and sluggishness of every human being at the moment of birth.
The purpose of the principle of population, and of the other difficulties encountered in life, is to stimulate man to raise himself out of this original state.
(viii) Finally, Malthus' theology included the doctrine of annihilationism (or conditional immortality), according to which eternal life is not an essential part of the human soul at birth, but is granted only to those who attain during life on earth an adequate growth of mind.
The others are, at death, not condemned to eternal suffering, but are annihilated, body and soul.
Related Results
“I would sooner die than give up”: Huxley and Darwin's deep disagreement
“I would sooner die than give up”: Huxley and Darwin's deep disagreement
AbstractThomas Henry Huxley and Charles Darwin discovered in 1857 that they had a fundamental disagreement about biological classification. Darwin believed that the natural system ...
Mystifying What Matters: Erotic Antiquarianism in Erasmus Darwin’s Portland Vase
Mystifying What Matters: Erotic Antiquarianism in Erasmus Darwin’s Portland Vase
Critics from the eighteenth century to the present have largely agreed in portraying Erasmus Darwin as an apostle of sexual liberation. One of Darwin’s career-long themes, that ero...
Celebrating Darwin
Celebrating Darwin
his year, we celebrate two hundred years since the birth of Charles Darwin (1809-1882), one of the world's most creative and influential thinkers, and one hundred and fifty years s...
An Angelic Jesus?
An Angelic Jesus?
SummaryThis paper offers a close reading of the Muslim theologian Najm al-Dīn al-Ṭūfī’s (d. 716/1316) five treatises in which he describes Jesus in angelic terms, asserting that in...
Natural Histories of Form
Natural Histories of Form
Arguing that aesthetic preference generates the historical forms of human racial and gender difference in The Descent of Man, Charles Darwin offers an alternative account of aesthe...
Ibsen and Darwin: A Reading of The Wild Duck
Ibsen and Darwin: A Reading of The Wild Duck
The question of the possible influence of Darwin’s scientific ideas on Ibsen’s plays, on The Wild Duck in particular, has been addressed more than once in Ibsen scholarship, and ye...
Darwin and the Tree of Life: the roots of the evolutionary tree
Darwin and the Tree of Life: the roots of the evolutionary tree
To speak of evolutionary trees and of the Tree of Life has become routine in evolution studies, despite recurrent objections. Because it is not immediately obvious why a tree is su...
The tree as evolutionary icon: TREE in the Natural History Museum, London (William T. Stearn Prize 2010)
The tree as evolutionary icon: TREE in the Natural History Museum, London (William T. Stearn Prize 2010)
As part of the Darwin celebrations in 2009, the Natural History Museum in London unveiled TREE, the first contemporary artwork to win a permanent place in the Museum. While the art...