Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Malthus, Jesus, and Darwin

View through CrossRef
Malthus' theological ideas were most clearly presented in the final two chapters of the first edition (1798) of his Essay on the Principle of Population. They can be classified under eight main headings. (i) He admitted that the pressure of population causes much misery and evil, but he did not accept that this in any way impugned the benevolence of the Creator. He situated the population problem within the general context of the problem of evil, and argued that population pressure is permitted and ordained by the Creator as a means of stimulating mankind to attain a higher good. (ii) He opposed the traditional Christian notion that this world is a state of trial, with population pressure being one aspect of that trial. He believed that this notion of a state of trial is inconsistent with the notion of an omniscient Creator, and that it is therefore necessary to reject the notion of a state of trial in order to save the notion of Divine omniscience. (iii) Instead of viewing this world as a state of trial, he viewed it ‘as the mighty process of God, not for the trial, but for the creation and formation of mindr. This notion of the growth of mind is the central aspect of Malthus' theology. (iv) He expressed doubts about the omnipotence of the Creator, arguing that God did not have the power to create perfect human beings instantaneously, but required a certain process or a certain time to form beings with ‘exalted qualities of mind’. Malthus seemed to argue that Divine omnipotence and Divine benevolence are incompatible – because a truly benevolent creator would not have subjected mankind to the miseries of this world if He had the power to create a perfect world. Malthus was prepared to sacrifice the notion of Divine omnipotence in order to save the notion of Divine benevolence. (v) He saw the principle of population as part of the Divine plan for the replenishment of the earth, i.e. its full cultivation and peopling. (vi) His attitude to worldly pleasures and comforts was distinctly unpuritanical, and leaning towards hedonism. His ethics were world-enhancing, rather than world-denying and retreatist. (This point is discussed more fully in Part II below.) (vii) He gave a naturalistic interpretation of the Biblical doctrine of original sin, describing original sin as the original state of torpor and sluggishness of every human being at the moment of birth. The purpose of the principle of population, and of the other difficulties encountered in life, is to stimulate man to raise himself out of this original state. (viii) Finally, Malthus' theology included the doctrine of annihilationism (or conditional immortality), according to which eternal life is not an essential part of the human soul at birth, but is granted only to those who attain during life on earth an adequate growth of mind. The others are, at death, not condemned to eternal suffering, but are annihilated, body and soul.
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Title: Malthus, Jesus, and Darwin
Description:
Malthus' theological ideas were most clearly presented in the final two chapters of the first edition (1798) of his Essay on the Principle of Population.
They can be classified under eight main headings.
(i) He admitted that the pressure of population causes much misery and evil, but he did not accept that this in any way impugned the benevolence of the Creator.
He situated the population problem within the general context of the problem of evil, and argued that population pressure is permitted and ordained by the Creator as a means of stimulating mankind to attain a higher good.
(ii) He opposed the traditional Christian notion that this world is a state of trial, with population pressure being one aspect of that trial.
He believed that this notion of a state of trial is inconsistent with the notion of an omniscient Creator, and that it is therefore necessary to reject the notion of a state of trial in order to save the notion of Divine omniscience.
(iii) Instead of viewing this world as a state of trial, he viewed it ‘as the mighty process of God, not for the trial, but for the creation and formation of mindr.
This notion of the growth of mind is the central aspect of Malthus' theology.
(iv) He expressed doubts about the omnipotence of the Creator, arguing that God did not have the power to create perfect human beings instantaneously, but required a certain process or a certain time to form beings with ‘exalted qualities of mind’.
Malthus seemed to argue that Divine omnipotence and Divine benevolence are incompatible – because a truly benevolent creator would not have subjected mankind to the miseries of this world if He had the power to create a perfect world.
Malthus was prepared to sacrifice the notion of Divine omnipotence in order to save the notion of Divine benevolence.
(v) He saw the principle of population as part of the Divine plan for the replenishment of the earth, i.
e.
its full cultivation and peopling.
(vi) His attitude to worldly pleasures and comforts was distinctly unpuritanical, and leaning towards hedonism.
His ethics were world-enhancing, rather than world-denying and retreatist.
(This point is discussed more fully in Part II below.
) (vii) He gave a naturalistic interpretation of the Biblical doctrine of original sin, describing original sin as the original state of torpor and sluggishness of every human being at the moment of birth.
The purpose of the principle of population, and of the other difficulties encountered in life, is to stimulate man to raise himself out of this original state.
(viii) Finally, Malthus' theology included the doctrine of annihilationism (or conditional immortality), according to which eternal life is not an essential part of the human soul at birth, but is granted only to those who attain during life on earth an adequate growth of mind.
The others are, at death, not condemned to eternal suffering, but are annihilated, body and soul.

Related Results

Malthus and Classical Economies : The Malthus-Ricardo Relationship
Malthus and Classical Economies : The Malthus-Ricardo Relationship
La relation entre Malthus et Ricardo est une façon d'aborder le problème de la place de Malthus au sein de l'école classique. Je ne trouve pas qu'il y a des différences substantiel...
Charles Darwin
Charles Darwin
Anyone beginning to learn about Charles Darwin (b. 1809–d. 1882) will sooner or later need to reckon with the vast body of writings by him and about him. This bibliographic guide a...
Darwin’s Island: The Galapagos in the Garden of England; Darwin’s Sacred Cause: Race Slavery and the Quest for Human Origins
Darwin’s Island: The Galapagos in the Garden of England; Darwin’s Sacred Cause: Race Slavery and the Quest for Human Origins
This chapter explores two books regarding Charles Darwin's theory of evolution — Darwin's Island: The Galapagos in the Garden of England (2009) by Steve Jones, and Darwin's Sacred ...
Darwin’s prescient letter regarding orchid mycorrhiza
Darwin’s prescient letter regarding orchid mycorrhiza
On March 26, 1863, Charles Darwin wrote a letter to Joseph Dalton Hooker, describing his attempts to germinate orchid seeds. In this letter, he mentioned his hope to observe orchid...
Modlitwa poranna Jezusa (Mk 1,35)
Modlitwa poranna Jezusa (Mk 1,35)
The study of Mk 1,35 which is situated at the end of the first missionary day of Jesus in Capharnaum (Mk 1,21-34.35-39), is divided into four parts. The first part offers a general...
“I would sooner die than give up”: Huxley and Darwin's deep disagreement
“I would sooner die than give up”: Huxley and Darwin's deep disagreement
AbstractThomas Henry Huxley and Charles Darwin discovered in 1857 that they had a fundamental disagreement about biological classification. Darwin believed that the natural system ...
Charles Darwin and lady hope — the legend still alive
Charles Darwin and lady hope — the legend still alive
The theme of the present paper is the story of Darwin’s conversion as spread by Elizabeth Hope. Her article was published in August 1915. She wrote under the pseudonym “Lady Hope”,...

Back to Top