Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Organization of Grain Harvest Statistics in Siberia in 1930s
View through CrossRef
Harvest statistics in USSR in the 1920s was based on techniques and approaches used in Russian Empire. In 1930 it became a subject of reforms. Statistical representatives of village councils who replaced voluntary correspondents were supposed to report to the district commissions information on specific\biological yield and the results of grain threshing. Regional commissions were obliged to summarize received information, check it and make corrections to primary materials for underestimation. In the early 1930s harvest statistics were doubtful. Amendments were subjective. Their value depended on the choice of behavioral strategies of the district and regional authorities. The size of the officially approved gross product did not depend on the real barn weight but on the political situation. At the same time, the basic indicator of its determination was growing yield, based on which grain procurement plans were approved. A higher degree of reliability of the accounting system should have been provided by Central and Regional State Commissions for Yield Accounting created in 1933. Central State Commission developed and applied methods of calculating the “optimal yield” (yield minus inevitable losses), “optimal economic yield” (excluding technically inevitable losses), “actual yield” (taking into account losses used on the farm). Amount of the losses was accounted during random inspections of farms. Despite the reforms, yield estimation remained politically driven. Harvest statistics were still largely propagandistic and mobilizing in nature. In 1937 state commissions were liquidated, and the national economic accounting services inherited the task of yield calculating. In 1939 procedure of harvest calculating was once again revised. Accounting average yield contained all losses, including those unused on the farm.
Title: Organization of Grain Harvest Statistics in Siberia in 1930s
Description:
Harvest statistics in USSR in the 1920s was based on techniques and approaches used in Russian Empire.
In 1930 it became a subject of reforms.
Statistical representatives of village councils who replaced voluntary correspondents were supposed to report to the district commissions information on specific\biological yield and the results of grain threshing.
Regional commissions were obliged to summarize received information, check it and make corrections to primary materials for underestimation.
In the early 1930s harvest statistics were doubtful.
Amendments were subjective.
Their value depended on the choice of behavioral strategies of the district and regional authorities.
The size of the officially approved gross product did not depend on the real barn weight but on the political situation.
At the same time, the basic indicator of its determination was growing yield, based on which grain procurement plans were approved.
A higher degree of reliability of the accounting system should have been provided by Central and Regional State Commissions for Yield Accounting created in 1933.
Central State Commission developed and applied methods of calculating the “optimal yield” (yield minus inevitable losses), “optimal economic yield” (excluding technically inevitable losses), “actual yield” (taking into account losses used on the farm).
Amount of the losses was accounted during random inspections of farms.
Despite the reforms, yield estimation remained politically driven.
Harvest statistics were still largely propagandistic and mobilizing in nature.
In 1937 state commissions were liquidated, and the national economic accounting services inherited the task of yield calculating.
In 1939 procedure of harvest calculating was once again revised.
Accounting average yield contained all losses, including those unused on the farm.
Related Results
Nondestructive 3D Image Analysis Pipeline to Extract Rice Grain Traits Using X-Ray Computed Tomography
Nondestructive 3D Image Analysis Pipeline to Extract Rice Grain Traits Using X-Ray Computed Tomography
The traits of rice panicles play important roles in yield assessment, variety classification, rice breeding, and cultivation management. Most traditional grain phenotyping methods ...
Gravel Packing Sand Quality-A Quantitative Study
Gravel Packing Sand Quality-A Quantitative Study
Summary
This paper discusses the results of a study of gravel packing sand quality. It shows that the amount of fines packing sand quality. It shows that the amou...
XXI festival “Zodchesvo in Siberia 2021”
XXI festival “Zodchesvo in Siberia 2021”
The Festival “Zodchestvo of Eastern Siberia” was founded at the turn of the millennium. The first Festival was held in 2001 at Irkutsk Sibexpocenter and caused a massive outcry amo...
Corn Hybrid Response to Planting Date in the Northern Corn Belt
Corn Hybrid Response to Planting Date in the Northern Corn Belt
Growers frequently are concerned about the response of corn (Zea mays L.) to planting date. Early planting of corn is recommended because full‐season hybrids utilize the entire gro...
The 1932 Harvest and the Famine of 1933
The 1932 Harvest and the Famine of 1933
Western and even Soviet publications have described the 1933 famine in the Soviet Union as “man-made” or “artificial.” The Stalinist leadership is presented as having imposed harsh...
Husked and ‘Naked’ Grain
Husked and ‘Naked’ Grain
When classical scholars use the term ‘spelt’ to translate such words as and in Greek, and far, odor, semen (adoreum), arinca, and the like in Latin, they seldom realize that all ...
The Pleistocene Prehistory of Siberia
The Pleistocene Prehistory of Siberia
Very little is known about the prehistory of Siberia prior to the Sartan (“Main Würm” = “Main Wisconsin”) Stadial of the Last Glacial. It is not yet clear whether this is result of...
Neutrosophic Statistics for Social Science
Neutrosophic Statistics for Social Science
Social Science deals with the study of phenomena related to the social status of human beings. The importance of such sciences lies in the fact that they make it possible to know, ...