Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

TRansit ACessibility Tool (TRACT): Developing a novel scoring system for public transportation system accessibility

View through CrossRef
Introduction: Although federal laws require equal access to public transportation for people with disabilities, access barriers persist. Lack of sharing accessibility information on public transportation websites restricts people with disabilities from making transportation plans and effectively using public transportation systems. This project aims to document information provided about public transportation systems accessibility and share this information using an open data platform. Methods: We reviewed the top twenty-six public transportation systems in the United States based on federal funding in fiscal year 2020. Information about accessibility was abstracted from the webpages of each public transportation system by two independent reviewers from February-March 2022. Informed by universal design principles, public transportation systems were scored across six dimensions: facility accessibility (0-22 points), vehicle accessibility (0-11 points), inclusive policies (0-12 points), rider accommodations (0-9 points), paratransit services (0-6 points), and website accessibility (0-2 points). Total scores were calculated as the sum of each dimension and ranged from 0-62 points. Data and findings were publicly disseminated (https://disabilityhealth.jhu.edu/tract-dashboard/). Results: The average overall accessibility information score was 31.9 (SD=6.2) out of 62 possible points. Mean scores were 8.4 (SD=2.9) for facility accessibility, 4.5 (SD=2.1) for vehicle accessibility, 7.8 (SD=1.6) for inclusive policies, 4.9 (SD=1.6) for rider accommodations, 4.5 (SD=2.0) for paratransit services, and 1.8 (SD=0.4) for website accessibility. Eleven public transportation systems (42%) received the maximum score for paratransit services and 20 (77%) received the maximum score for website accessibility. No public transportation system received the maximum score for any of the other dimensions. Conclusions: Using a novel scoring system, we found significant variation in the accessibility information presented on public transportation system websites. Websites are a primary mode where users obtain objective information about public transportation systems and are therefore important platforms for communication. Absence of accessibility information creates barriers for the disability community and restricts equal access to public transportation.
Title: TRansit ACessibility Tool (TRACT): Developing a novel scoring system for public transportation system accessibility
Description:
Introduction: Although federal laws require equal access to public transportation for people with disabilities, access barriers persist.
Lack of sharing accessibility information on public transportation websites restricts people with disabilities from making transportation plans and effectively using public transportation systems.
This project aims to document information provided about public transportation systems accessibility and share this information using an open data platform.
Methods: We reviewed the top twenty-six public transportation systems in the United States based on federal funding in fiscal year 2020.
Information about accessibility was abstracted from the webpages of each public transportation system by two independent reviewers from February-March 2022.
Informed by universal design principles, public transportation systems were scored across six dimensions: facility accessibility (0-22 points), vehicle accessibility (0-11 points), inclusive policies (0-12 points), rider accommodations (0-9 points), paratransit services (0-6 points), and website accessibility (0-2 points).
Total scores were calculated as the sum of each dimension and ranged from 0-62 points.
Data and findings were publicly disseminated (https://disabilityhealth.
jhu.
edu/tract-dashboard/).
Results: The average overall accessibility information score was 31.
9 (SD=6.
2) out of 62 possible points.
Mean scores were 8.
4 (SD=2.
9) for facility accessibility, 4.
5 (SD=2.
1) for vehicle accessibility, 7.
8 (SD=1.
6) for inclusive policies, 4.
9 (SD=1.
6) for rider accommodations, 4.
5 (SD=2.
0) for paratransit services, and 1.
8 (SD=0.
4) for website accessibility.
Eleven public transportation systems (42%) received the maximum score for paratransit services and 20 (77%) received the maximum score for website accessibility.
No public transportation system received the maximum score for any of the other dimensions.
Conclusions: Using a novel scoring system, we found significant variation in the accessibility information presented on public transportation system websites.
Websites are a primary mode where users obtain objective information about public transportation systems and are therefore important platforms for communication.
Absence of accessibility information creates barriers for the disability community and restricts equal access to public transportation.

Related Results

Measuring Public Transit Accessibility Based On Google Direction API
Measuring Public Transit Accessibility Based On Google Direction API
Background: Accessibility is considered as an important indicator for the public transit service level. Transit accessibility is generally evaluated by its dist...
Optimising tool wear and workpiece condition monitoring via cyber-physical systems for smart manufacturing
Optimising tool wear and workpiece condition monitoring via cyber-physical systems for smart manufacturing
Smart manufacturing has been developed since the introduction of Industry 4.0. It consists of resource sharing and networking, predictive engineering, and material and data analyti...
Using accessibility measures in transit network design
Using accessibility measures in transit network design
Transit planning scenarios may lead to the different Objective Function (OF) values since each scenario has different transit travel times, frequencies and fleet sizes. Change on t...
Non-Recommended Publishing Lists: Strategies for Detecting Deceitful Journals
Non-Recommended Publishing Lists: Strategies for Detecting Deceitful Journals
Abstract The rapid growth of open access publishing (OAP) has significantly improved the accessibility and dissemination of scientific knowledge. However, this expansion has also c...
Does the Transit Industry Understand the Risks of Cybersecurity and are the Risks Being Appropriately Prioritized?
Does the Transit Industry Understand the Risks of Cybersecurity and are the Risks Being Appropriately Prioritized?
The intent of this study is to assess the readiness, resourcing, and capabilities of public transit agencies to detect, identify, be protected from, respond to, and recover from cy...
Not Minding the Gap: Does Ride-Hailing Serve Transit Deserts?
Not Minding the Gap: Does Ride-Hailing Serve Transit Deserts?
Transit has long connected people to opportunities but access to transit varies greatly across space. In some cases, unevenly distributed transit supply creates gaps in service tha...

Back to Top