Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Hedwig Dohm (1831–1919)

View through CrossRef
Abstract This chapter investigates the contribution of German feminist philosopher and writer Hedwig Dohm (1831–1919) to the debate on the nature and value of compassion (Mitleid) between Arthur Schopenhauer and Friedrich Nietzsche. I argue that her contribution consists of three main points. First, she highlights the gendered nature of compassion, taking Schopenhauer’s discussion out of the transcendental realm and situating it in a dynamic social context. Second, Dohm illuminates parallels between the norms of the nineteenth-century bourgeois woman’s lifecycle and the increasing degrees of self-lessness in Schopenhauer’s Mitleids-Moral. Thus, she joins Nietzsche in the criticisms of its harmful effects on the self, but Dohm focuses her attention on the half of the human population that is intensively socialized to fall under its sway. Third, she criticizes Nietzsche’s ideal of the Overman or Zarathustra, replacing it with the ideal of “The New Mother,” an ideal that feels timely even today.
Title: Hedwig Dohm (1831–1919)
Description:
Abstract This chapter investigates the contribution of German feminist philosopher and writer Hedwig Dohm (1831–1919) to the debate on the nature and value of compassion (Mitleid) between Arthur Schopenhauer and Friedrich Nietzsche.
I argue that her contribution consists of three main points.
First, she highlights the gendered nature of compassion, taking Schopenhauer’s discussion out of the transcendental realm and situating it in a dynamic social context.
Second, Dohm illuminates parallels between the norms of the nineteenth-century bourgeois woman’s lifecycle and the increasing degrees of self-lessness in Schopenhauer’s Mitleids-Moral.
Thus, she joins Nietzsche in the criticisms of its harmful effects on the self, but Dohm focuses her attention on the half of the human population that is intensively socialized to fall under its sway.
Third, she criticizes Nietzsche’s ideal of the Overman or Zarathustra, replacing it with the ideal of “The New Mother,” an ideal that feels timely even today.

Related Results

Hedwig Dohm (1831–1919)
Hedwig Dohm (1831–1919)
In this chapter, which includes four independent essays, Hedwig Dohm develops arguments for women’s emancipation, articulates a critique of essentialism, and assesses the claims of...
Йосип Маєвський – організатор повстанського руху на Поділлі у 1918-1919 рр.
Йосип Маєвський – організатор повстанського руху на Поділлі у 1918-1919 рр.
The article attempts to uncover obscure episodes of the rebel movement in Podillia in late 1919 - early 1919. and display the activities of the former member of the Ukrainian Centr...
Rezension von: Hedwig, Andreas (Hrsg.), Zeitenwende in Hessen
Rezension von: Hedwig, Andreas (Hrsg.), Zeitenwende in Hessen
Andreas Hedwig (Hg.), Zeitenwende in Hessen. Revolutionärer Aufbruch 1918/1919 in die Demokratie. Begleitband zur gleichnamigen Ausstellung des Hessischen Landesarchivs (Schriften ...
Karol Kaczkowski (1787-1867) generał sztabu, lekarz-epidemiolog, innowator, nauczyciel
Karol Kaczkowski (1787-1867) generał sztabu, lekarz-epidemiolog, innowator, nauczyciel
<p><strong>ABSTRACT</strong><br />The name of Karol Kaczkowski, one of the pioneers of Polish epidemiology of the 19th century, has been somewhat forgotten....
THE CONTRIBUTION OF THE FELLOWSHIP OF POSTGRADUATE MEDICINE TO MEDICINE 1919–2025
THE CONTRIBUTION OF THE FELLOWSHIP OF POSTGRADUATE MEDICINE TO MEDICINE 1919–2025
Abstract Sir William Osler Bt, considered by many the greatest figure in the medical world at the time, arrived in Britain in 1905 when he was appointed Regius Pr...

Back to Top