Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Validation of the Hospital Frailty Risk Score among older adults receiving mechanical ventilation
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Background:Older adults are increasingly being admitted to intensive care units, with frailty recognized as a risk factor for worse outcomes. The Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) was developed for use in administrative databases of older adults, but it has not yet been well-validated for critically ill patients. The objective of this study was to validate the HFRS to predict prolonged hospitalization, in-hospital mortality, and 30-day emergency hospital readmissions in critically ill patients.Methods:We selected index hospitalizations of older adults (≥75 years old) receiving mechanical ventilation, using the United States Nationwide Readmissions Database from January 1, 2016 to November 30, 2018. Frailty risk was determined by the HFRS using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) codes, and further subcategorized into low (score <5), intermediate (score 5-15), and high (score >15) risk for frailty. We evaluated the HFRS to predict prolonged hospitalization, in-hospital mortality, and 30-day emergency hospital readmissions, using multivariable logistic regression after adjustment for patient and hospital characteristics. Model performance was assessed using the c-statistic, Brier score, and calibration plots.Results:Among the 649,330 weighted index hospitalizations in the cohort, 50.0% were female, the median (interquartile range [IQR]) age was 81 (78-86) years old, and the median (IQR) HFRS was 10.8 (7.7-14.5). Among the cohort, 9.5%, 68.3%, and 22.2% were subcategorized as low, intermediate, and high risk for frailty, respectively. After adjustment, patient hospitalizations with high frailty risk were associated with increased risks of prolonged hospitalization (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 5.59 [95% confidence interval [CI] 5.24-5.97], c-statistic 0.694, Brier score 0.216) and 30-day emergency hospital readmissions (aOR 1.20 [95% CI 1.13-1.27], c-statistic 0.595, Brier score 0.162), compared to low frailty risks. Conversely, high frailty risk using the HFRS was inversely associated with in-hospital mortality (aOR 0.46 [95% CI 0.45-0.48], c-statistic 0.712, Brier score 0.214). Calibration plots demonstrated good calibration for the adjusted analyses.Conclusions:The HFRS is associated with prolonged hospitalization and 30-day readmission in older adults receiving mechanical ventilation. Further research is necessary to develop frailty scores that accurately and intuitively predict mortality in critically ill patients.
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Title: Validation of the Hospital Frailty Risk Score among older adults receiving mechanical ventilation
Description:
Abstract
Background:Older adults are increasingly being admitted to intensive care units, with frailty recognized as a risk factor for worse outcomes.
The Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) was developed for use in administrative databases of older adults, but it has not yet been well-validated for critically ill patients.
The objective of this study was to validate the HFRS to predict prolonged hospitalization, in-hospital mortality, and 30-day emergency hospital readmissions in critically ill patients.
Methods:We selected index hospitalizations of older adults (≥75 years old) receiving mechanical ventilation, using the United States Nationwide Readmissions Database from January 1, 2016 to November 30, 2018.
Frailty risk was determined by the HFRS using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) codes, and further subcategorized into low (score <5), intermediate (score 5-15), and high (score >15) risk for frailty.
We evaluated the HFRS to predict prolonged hospitalization, in-hospital mortality, and 30-day emergency hospital readmissions, using multivariable logistic regression after adjustment for patient and hospital characteristics.
Model performance was assessed using the c-statistic, Brier score, and calibration plots.
Results:Among the 649,330 weighted index hospitalizations in the cohort, 50.
0% were female, the median (interquartile range [IQR]) age was 81 (78-86) years old, and the median (IQR) HFRS was 10.
8 (7.
7-14.
5).
Among the cohort, 9.
5%, 68.
3%, and 22.
2% were subcategorized as low, intermediate, and high risk for frailty, respectively.
After adjustment, patient hospitalizations with high frailty risk were associated with increased risks of prolonged hospitalization (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 5.
59 [95% confidence interval [CI] 5.
24-5.
97], c-statistic 0.
694, Brier score 0.
216) and 30-day emergency hospital readmissions (aOR 1.
20 [95% CI 1.
13-1.
27], c-statistic 0.
595, Brier score 0.
162), compared to low frailty risks.
Conversely, high frailty risk using the HFRS was inversely associated with in-hospital mortality (aOR 0.
46 [95% CI 0.
45-0.
48], c-statistic 0.
712, Brier score 0.
214).
Calibration plots demonstrated good calibration for the adjusted analyses.
Conclusions:The HFRS is associated with prolonged hospitalization and 30-day readmission in older adults receiving mechanical ventilation.
Further research is necessary to develop frailty scores that accurately and intuitively predict mortality in critically ill patients.
Related Results
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract
The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical a...
Prevalence and factors associated with frailty in older adults from the Kenyan coast
Prevalence and factors associated with frailty in older adults from the Kenyan coast
Abstract
Background: The burden and determinants of frailty in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) are largely unknown despite a rapidly aging population in the region. To address the...
Impact of Frailty on Outcomes of Total Joint Replacement and Differentiating the Impaction of Comorbidity and Frailty
Impact of Frailty on Outcomes of Total Joint Replacement and Differentiating the Impaction of Comorbidity and Frailty
Abstract
Background: Frailty is a reduced capacity to recover from a physiologically stressful event. It is well established that preoperative frailty is associated with po...
Loneliness as a risk factor for frailty transition among Chinese old people
Loneliness as a risk factor for frailty transition among Chinese old people
Abstract
Background: loneliness has been observed to be associated with subsequent adverse outcomes. Our study aims to investigate whether and how loneliness is related to ...
Incorporating frailty to address the key challenges to geriatric economic evaluation
Incorporating frailty to address the key challenges to geriatric economic evaluation
Abstract
Background
The multidimensional and dynamically complex process of ageing presents key challenges to economic evaluation of geriatric inter...
External validation of the Hospital Frailty Risk Score among older adults receiving mechanical ventilation
External validation of the Hospital Frailty Risk Score among older adults receiving mechanical ventilation
Abstract
Purpose:To externally validate the Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) to predict clinical outcomes in critically ill patients.Methods:We selected index hospitaliza...
FRAILTY AND PRE-FRAILTY IN A CONTEMPORARY COHORT OF HIV-INFECTED ADULTS
FRAILTY AND PRE-FRAILTY IN A CONTEMPORARY COHORT OF HIV-INFECTED ADULTS
Objectives: To determine the prevalence of pre-frailty among HIV-infected persons and associationswith pre-frailty and frailty in this population. Design, Setting ...
Frailty among Community Dwelling Older Adults: Prevalence and Associated Factors
Frailty among Community Dwelling Older Adults: Prevalence and Associated Factors
Abstract
Background: Frailty is an important and a highly prevalent health problem in older adults that has a negative impact on health related outcomes. The importance of ...

