Adjuvant sorafenib for hepatocellular carcinoma after radiofrequency ablation versus radiofrequency ablation: analysis of its efficacy and safety

ObjectivesFor the treatment of early hepatocellular carcinoma, we compared the efficacy and safety of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) alone and radiofrequency ablation combined with sorafenib (RFA+Sor).MethodsA total of 164 patients with early HCC were included in the study. There were 87 patients who underwent RFA alone, and 77 patients who underwent RFA+Sor treatment. Overall survival (OS) was the primary endpoint of the study, and recurrence-free survival (RFS) and safety were the secondary endpoints.ResultsAccording to the RFA group, the RFS rates were 74.7%, 29.9%, and 11.5% at 1, 2, and 3 years, whereas in the RFA+Sor group, the RFS rates were 72.7%, 19.5%, and 11.7% at 1, 2, and 3 years (P>0.05). RFA and RFA+Sor groups had median OS of 35.0 and 41.0 months, respectively (P>0.05). For the RFA and RFA+Sor groups, the median RFS was 17.0 and 16.0 months, respectively (P>0.05). Based on the univariate regression analysis, there was no statistically significant difference between the subgroups (P>0.05). Skin rashes only occurred in the RFA+Sor group, and other adverse effects were not significantly different between the two groups (P>0.05).ConclusionsTreatment with RFA+Sor treatment did not result in a longer OS than treatment with only RFA, however, the adverse effects of adjuvant Sorafenib were acceptable.