Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Momentum profits and idiosyncratic volatility: the Korean evidence
View through CrossRef
PurposeThis study aims to focus on the profitability of momentum trading in the Korean stock market. More specifically, it aims to conduct an examination of the relationship between momentum returns and idiosyncratic volatility (IVol) to determine whether momentum profits can be explained by IVol.Design/methodology/approachPortfolios are formed based on their past performance and examine the momentum, or contrarian returns, as the difference between winning and losing portfolios. To confirm that the momentum strategy provides excess returns, the relationship between momentum returns and IVol is studied. The Fama and French three‐factor model is also examined to see whether systematic risk affects momentum profits. Firm size, stock price, and turnover are controlled to determine robustness. Finally, a time‐series relationship between aggregate IVol and momentum profits is investigated.FindingsThe paper illustrates that excess returns are obtained from a momentum strategy, not a contrarian strategy, in the Korean stock market. Momentum returns are higher among high IVol stocks, especially high IVol winners. Examining the Fama and French three‐factor model, it is found that momentum returns cannot be explained by systematic risk. The findings are robust after controlling for factors such as firm size, book‐to‐market ratio, and turnover. The paper confirms the effect of IVol on momentum returns by illustrating that a time‐series relationship between momentum returns and aggregate IVol is positive.Originality/valueThis paper is among the first, to the authors' knowledge, to examine the relationship between momentum profits and IVol in the Korean stock market, one of the mature financial markets. The findings in this study can be applied to better understand the sources of gains from the momentum strategy in international stock markets.
Title: Momentum profits and idiosyncratic volatility: the Korean evidence
Description:
PurposeThis study aims to focus on the profitability of momentum trading in the Korean stock market.
More specifically, it aims to conduct an examination of the relationship between momentum returns and idiosyncratic volatility (IVol) to determine whether momentum profits can be explained by IVol.
Design/methodology/approachPortfolios are formed based on their past performance and examine the momentum, or contrarian returns, as the difference between winning and losing portfolios.
To confirm that the momentum strategy provides excess returns, the relationship between momentum returns and IVol is studied.
The Fama and French three‐factor model is also examined to see whether systematic risk affects momentum profits.
Firm size, stock price, and turnover are controlled to determine robustness.
Finally, a time‐series relationship between aggregate IVol and momentum profits is investigated.
FindingsThe paper illustrates that excess returns are obtained from a momentum strategy, not a contrarian strategy, in the Korean stock market.
Momentum returns are higher among high IVol stocks, especially high IVol winners.
Examining the Fama and French three‐factor model, it is found that momentum returns cannot be explained by systematic risk.
The findings are robust after controlling for factors such as firm size, book‐to‐market ratio, and turnover.
The paper confirms the effect of IVol on momentum returns by illustrating that a time‐series relationship between momentum returns and aggregate IVol is positive.
Originality/valueThis paper is among the first, to the authors' knowledge, to examine the relationship between momentum profits and IVol in the Korean stock market, one of the mature financial markets.
The findings in this study can be applied to better understand the sources of gains from the momentum strategy in international stock markets.
Related Results
Size, conditional idiosyncratic risk and price momentum: an international study
Size, conditional idiosyncratic risk and price momentum: an international study
PurposeThis paper jointly examines how firm size and idiosyncratic risk impact momentum returns.Design/methodology/approachUsing regression analysis, the authors investigate how fi...
Forecasting Volatility
Forecasting Volatility
This monograph puts together results from several lines of research that I have pursued over a period of years, on the general topic of volatility forecasting for option pricing ap...
The Impact of Interest Rate Volatility on Stock Returns Volatility: Empirical Evidence from Pakistan Stock Exchange
The Impact of Interest Rate Volatility on Stock Returns Volatility: Empirical Evidence from Pakistan Stock Exchange
Apprehension pertaining to Stock return volatility always has been producing the appreciable significance in the various current research works and it has been lucrative to many re...
Framing Buku Pernah Tenggelam Terhadap Fenomena Korean Wave
Framing Buku Pernah Tenggelam Terhadap Fenomena Korean Wave
Abstract. Nowadays, Korean wave is growing in Indonesia, but there are also various phenomena of Korean wave that are contrary to Islamic law. Fuadh Naim, a former Korean wave fanb...
Volatility Analysis of Nepalese Stock Market
Volatility Analysis of Nepalese Stock Market
Modeling and forecasting volatility of capital markets has been important area of inquiry and research in financial economics with the recognition of time-varying volatility, volat...
Operation Review
Operation Review
The purpose of this paper is to examine the current status and problems of the operation of the Korean language curriculum so that the Korean language curriculum (KSL) can establis...
A comprehensive investigation into style momentum strategies in China
A comprehensive investigation into style momentum strategies in China
AbstractThis study conducts a comprehensive investigation into style momentum strategies—the combination of price momentum strategies based on previous medium-term returns and styl...
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
This review summarizes the evidence from six randomized controlled trials that judged the effectiveness of systematic review summaries on policymakers' decision making, or the most...

