Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

In defence of deep modelling

View through CrossRef
© 2015 Elsevier B.V. Context Since multi-level modelling emerged as a strategy for leveraging classification levels in conceptual models, there have been discussions about what it entails and how best to support it. Recently, some authors have claimed that the deep modelling approach to multi-level modelling entails paradoxes and significant weaknesses. By drawing upon concepts from speech act theory and foundational ontologies these authors argue that hitherto accepted principles for deep modelling should be abandoned and an alternative approach be adopted instead (Eriksson et al., 2013). Objective We investigate the validity of these claims and motivate the need to shift the focus of the debate from philosophical arguments to modelling pragmatics. Method We present each of the main objections raised against deep modelling in turn, classify them according to the kinds of arguments put forward, and analyse the cogency of the supporting justification. We furthermore analyse the counter proposal regarding its pragmatic value for modellers. Results Most of the criticisms against deep modelling are based on mismatches between the premisses used in published definitions of deep modelling and those used by the authors as the basis of their challenges. Hence, most of the criticisms levelled at deep modelling do not actually apply to deep modelling as defined in the literature. We also explain how the proposed alternative introduces new problems of its own, and evaluate its merits from a pragmatic modelling perspective. Finally, we show how deep modelling is indeed compatible with, and can be founded on, classic work in linguistics and logic. Conclusions The inappropriate interpretations of the core principles of deep modelling identified in this article indicate that previous descriptions of them have not had sufficient clarity. We therefore provide further clarification and foundational background material to reduce the chance for future misunderstandings and help establish deep modelling as a solid foundation for multi-level modelling.
Victoria University of Wellington Library
Title: In defence of deep modelling
Description:
© 2015 Elsevier B.
V.
Context Since multi-level modelling emerged as a strategy for leveraging classification levels in conceptual models, there have been discussions about what it entails and how best to support it.
Recently, some authors have claimed that the deep modelling approach to multi-level modelling entails paradoxes and significant weaknesses.
By drawing upon concepts from speech act theory and foundational ontologies these authors argue that hitherto accepted principles for deep modelling should be abandoned and an alternative approach be adopted instead (Eriksson et al.
, 2013).
Objective We investigate the validity of these claims and motivate the need to shift the focus of the debate from philosophical arguments to modelling pragmatics.
Method We present each of the main objections raised against deep modelling in turn, classify them according to the kinds of arguments put forward, and analyse the cogency of the supporting justification.
We furthermore analyse the counter proposal regarding its pragmatic value for modellers.
Results Most of the criticisms against deep modelling are based on mismatches between the premisses used in published definitions of deep modelling and those used by the authors as the basis of their challenges.
Hence, most of the criticisms levelled at deep modelling do not actually apply to deep modelling as defined in the literature.
We also explain how the proposed alternative introduces new problems of its own, and evaluate its merits from a pragmatic modelling perspective.
Finally, we show how deep modelling is indeed compatible with, and can be founded on, classic work in linguistics and logic.
Conclusions The inappropriate interpretations of the core principles of deep modelling identified in this article indicate that previous descriptions of them have not had sufficient clarity.
We therefore provide further clarification and foundational background material to reduce the chance for future misunderstandings and help establish deep modelling as a solid foundation for multi-level modelling.

Related Results

“HONEST DEFENSE” BY THOMAS DURELL YOUNG
“HONEST DEFENSE” BY THOMAS DURELL YOUNG
Last year, a new book by Dr. Thomas Durell Young was published by the British publisher Bloomsbury, entitled THE ANATOMY OF POST-COMMUNIST EUROPEAN DEFENCE INSTITUTIONS: THE MIRAGE...
"Neither staunch friends nor confirmed foes": New Zealand's defence diplomacy in Asia
"Neither staunch friends nor confirmed foes": New Zealand's defence diplomacy in Asia
<p>Read a recent Defence White Paper of any number of countries or look at the range of foreign relations one country has with others in the contemporary age, and one is like...
Indirekte Selbstverteidigung
Indirekte Selbstverteidigung
Is the right of self-defence (Art. 51 UN Charter), in equivalence to the prohibition of the use of force (Art. 2 No. 4 UN Charter), limited to forcible measures of counter-defence ...
General theoretical construction of the mechanism for implementing the defence function of the state: methodological characteristics.
General theoretical construction of the mechanism for implementing the defence function of the state: methodological characteristics.
The relevance of the subject under study is conditioned upon the scientific originality and practical significance of the implementation of the defence function of the state in the...
DEFENCE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT CHALLENGES
DEFENCE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT CHALLENGES
This paper explores the major factors that hinder the resource management process, which is critical to the development of defence institutions. An effective defence resource manag...
Advanced Financial Modelling and Analysis
Advanced Financial Modelling and Analysis
Abstract: This chapter, "Advanced Financial Modelling and Analysis," provides an in-depth exploration of the principles, techniques, and applications of financial modelling in the ...
Exploring State-Defence Industry Relations in Swedish Defence Policy, 2009&ndash;2022
Exploring State-Defence Industry Relations in Swedish Defence Policy, 2009&ndash;2022
The return to geopolitics in the formulation and execution of defence policy brings with it a need for the study of state-defence industry relations (SDIR) and insights into how go...
Kvinders medborgerskab i 1950’ernes atomalder. Civilforsvaret og danske kvinders beredskab
Kvinders medborgerskab i 1950’ernes atomalder. Civilforsvaret og danske kvinders beredskab
Women’s Citizenship in Denmark during the Early Nuclear Age: Danish Civil Defence and Women’s Voluntary ServicesThe article studies the role of gender in civil defence, a central c...

Back to Top