Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Reducing CO2 emissions by making cheaper CO2 capture technologies available
View through CrossRef
Abstract
The Royal Dutch Shell Group (Shell) was one of the first energy companies to acknowledge the threat of climate change - to call for action by governments; our industry and energy users; and to take action ourselves. Shell's strategy: to expand our alternative energies portfolio, while investing in advanced CO2 solutions in order to improve our ability to manage emissions from our hydrocarbon business. Measures to manage future emissions will include developing new technologies to capture and store CO2 underground. The pursuit of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) technologies allows Shell to play an important and leading role towards addressing the need for an increasing worldwide demand for energy, while at the same time dealing with the need to reduce global emissions.
No single universal policy or technology will solve the CO2 challenge. Therefore, various CCS solutions will need to be considered within a portfolio of measures to reduce global CO2 emissions while assisting a transition towards a low-carbon energy future. Shell seeks to position itself as part of the solution to the climate change issue.
The United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has identified CO2 capture and storage (CCS) as the most promising for the rapid reduction of global emissions - by up to 55% by 2100. As the bridge to a more sustainable energy system, it is therefore a key solution for combating climate change - among a portfolio of solutions, including renewable energies, energy efficiency and biofuels
In order to achieve deeper reductions in CO2 emissions there will need to be new technologies brought to the market to enable a 'Kyoto 2' type-agreement. Authorities such as the International Energy Agency, the European Union Commission for Research and the US Department of Energy predict that new technologies will include hydrogen fuels cells, clean coal technology, and storage of CO2 below ground - in deep saline formations or redundant reservoirs, or for enhanced oil recovery. Considerable attention is being focused on CO2 storage with the desire to reduce the cost of capture and storage below 25 $/t CO2.
Shell has a special team working on the CO2 Capture Project (CCP) Joint Industry Project. For the CCP Shell carries out studies, manages projects and the team is involved evaluating opportunities for deployment of the technologies within Shell. Shell also provides the Vice Chairman for this initiative and has several key-players working on this project. CCP is an international collaboration among industry, governments, academics and environmental interest groups focused on developing technology for CO2 capture and geological storage. The CO2 Capture Team (CCT) conducts Shell's participation in the CO2 Capture Project (CCP) and other external programs. CCT also works internally to apply external learnings and technologies within Shell businesses. Additionally, Shell's research and development funds and manages a separate CO2 storage program. Our goals are to:reduce the cost of capture by 60 to 80%, anddemonstrate that geological storage can be secure.
Title: Reducing CO2 emissions by making cheaper CO2 capture technologies available
Description:
Abstract
The Royal Dutch Shell Group (Shell) was one of the first energy companies to acknowledge the threat of climate change - to call for action by governments; our industry and energy users; and to take action ourselves.
Shell's strategy: to expand our alternative energies portfolio, while investing in advanced CO2 solutions in order to improve our ability to manage emissions from our hydrocarbon business.
Measures to manage future emissions will include developing new technologies to capture and store CO2 underground.
The pursuit of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) technologies allows Shell to play an important and leading role towards addressing the need for an increasing worldwide demand for energy, while at the same time dealing with the need to reduce global emissions.
No single universal policy or technology will solve the CO2 challenge.
Therefore, various CCS solutions will need to be considered within a portfolio of measures to reduce global CO2 emissions while assisting a transition towards a low-carbon energy future.
Shell seeks to position itself as part of the solution to the climate change issue.
The United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has identified CO2 capture and storage (CCS) as the most promising for the rapid reduction of global emissions - by up to 55% by 2100.
As the bridge to a more sustainable energy system, it is therefore a key solution for combating climate change - among a portfolio of solutions, including renewable energies, energy efficiency and biofuels
In order to achieve deeper reductions in CO2 emissions there will need to be new technologies brought to the market to enable a 'Kyoto 2' type-agreement.
Authorities such as the International Energy Agency, the European Union Commission for Research and the US Department of Energy predict that new technologies will include hydrogen fuels cells, clean coal technology, and storage of CO2 below ground - in deep saline formations or redundant reservoirs, or for enhanced oil recovery.
Considerable attention is being focused on CO2 storage with the desire to reduce the cost of capture and storage below 25 $/t CO2.
Shell has a special team working on the CO2 Capture Project (CCP) Joint Industry Project.
For the CCP Shell carries out studies, manages projects and the team is involved evaluating opportunities for deployment of the technologies within Shell.
Shell also provides the Vice Chairman for this initiative and has several key-players working on this project.
CCP is an international collaboration among industry, governments, academics and environmental interest groups focused on developing technology for CO2 capture and geological storage.
The CO2 Capture Team (CCT) conducts Shell's participation in the CO2 Capture Project (CCP) and other external programs.
CCT also works internally to apply external learnings and technologies within Shell businesses.
Additionally, Shell's research and development funds and manages a separate CO2 storage program.
Our goals are to:reduce the cost of capture by 60 to 80%, anddemonstrate that geological storage can be secure.
Related Results
Temporal patterns and potential drivers of CO
2
emission from dry sediments of a large river
Temporal patterns and potential drivers of CO
2
emission from dry sediments of a large river
Abstract. River sediments falling dry at low water level are sources of CO2 to the atmosphere. While the general relevance of CO2 emissions from dry sediments has been acknowledged...
Evaluation of Kaolinite and activated carbon performance for CO2 capture
Evaluation of Kaolinite and activated carbon performance for CO2 capture
Global climate change is one of the major threats facing the world today and can be due to increased atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases (GHGs), such as carbon dioxide (...
“Lavender Haze” in the Airways
“Lavender Haze” in the Airways
Introduction
Taylor Swift has dominated global press in recent years through the success of her Eras Tour, her use of authenticity in branding (Khanal 234), and her choreographed e...
Rapid Large-scale Trapping of CO2 via Dissolution in US Natural CO2 Reservoirs
Rapid Large-scale Trapping of CO2 via Dissolution in US Natural CO2 Reservoirs
Naturally occurring CO2 reservoirs across the USA are critical natural analogues of long-term CO2 storage in the subsurface over geological timescales and provide valuable insights...
Design And Operation Of The Levelland Unit CO2 Injection Facility
Design And Operation Of The Levelland Unit CO2 Injection Facility
Abstract
The Levelland CO2 Facility provides CO2 storageand handling capacity for the five CO2 injection pilots located in the Levelland Unit. Facilities pilots l...
Novel CO2 Capture Process Suitable for Near-Term CO2 EOR
Novel CO2 Capture Process Suitable for Near-Term CO2 EOR
Abstract
Recent studies have indicted that more than 40 billion barrels of additional oil can be produced economically with CO2-EOR for a low CO2 capture cost and an...
Monoethanolamine (MEA) degradation rates in post-combustion CO2 capture plants with the capture of 100% of the added CO2
Monoethanolamine (MEA) degradation rates in post-combustion CO2 capture plants with the capture of 100% of the added CO2
Residual emissions from post-combustion CO2 capture plants (PCC) must be reduced to zero or recaptured from the atmosphere to be compatible with long-term climate change goals. For...
Impact of CCUS Impurities on Dense Phase CO2 Pipeline Surface Engineering Design
Impact of CCUS Impurities on Dense Phase CO2 Pipeline Surface Engineering Design
Abstract
Numerous CO2 injection pipeline applications have been developed and implemented in the past decades in the UAE and all around the globe. Transporting the C...

