Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Prognostic impact of left ventricular ejection fraction recovery in patients undergoing pecutaneous aortic valve replacement
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Background
A lot of studies have shown a positive effect of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). However, the association between long-term outcomes and LVEF recovery after TAVI has not yet been well investigated.
Purpose
To detect differences in long-term all cause mortality between patients who recover LVEF at six mounths after TAVI and those who do not.
Methods
This is a retrospective, single-center study of 1092 patients undergoing TAVI. LVEF was determined before the intervention and at 6 months. The primary outcome was long-term all-cause mortality. Left ventricular dysfunction was defined as LVEF <50% and recovered LVEF as LVEF >50%.
Results
Of the 1.092 patients included, 250 (22.8%) had LVD. Of these, adequate follow-up was only achieved in 188, which were the ones included in the analysis. At 6 months, 86 patients (45.7%) had RLVEF. Table 1 shows the baseline characteristics of patients with RLVEF versus those who did not. No significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of comorbidity, procedural complications, or discharge therapy. There were no differences in baseline LVEF or severity of aortic valve disease, although the transaortic peak gradient (63.9±15.6 vs 73.6±19.7; p=0.019) and transaortic mean peak gradient (38.7±11.2 vs 45±12.7; P=0.026) were significantly higher in the RLVEF group. On the other hand, the group where the LVEF did not recover presented a higher percentage of moderate-severe mitral regurgitation (MR) (25.4 vs 8.1; p=0.005). These data could explain a more advanced state of cardiomyopathy and be an explanation for the different evolution of LVEF. In the multivariate analysis, only moderate-severe MR was associated as a predictor of non-recovery of LVEF after TAVI (HR 1.12; (1.09–1.45); p=0.023). During follow-up RLVEF was associated with a reduction in long-term all-cause mortality (p<0.001) (Figure 1)
Conclusions
Up to 25% of patients undergoing TAVI have baseline LVD. Of these, almost half recover it within six months. Patients who recover LVEF have a significant reduction in mortality in the medium term. The presence of a moderate-severe MR was associated with the non-recovery of LVEF after TAVI, probably because it was a more advanced cardiomyopathy.
Funding Acknowledgement
Type of funding sources: None.
Title: Prognostic impact of left ventricular ejection fraction recovery in patients undergoing pecutaneous aortic valve replacement
Description:
Abstract
Background
A lot of studies have shown a positive effect of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).
However, the association between long-term outcomes and LVEF recovery after TAVI has not yet been well investigated.
Purpose
To detect differences in long-term all cause mortality between patients who recover LVEF at six mounths after TAVI and those who do not.
Methods
This is a retrospective, single-center study of 1092 patients undergoing TAVI.
LVEF was determined before the intervention and at 6 months.
The primary outcome was long-term all-cause mortality.
Left ventricular dysfunction was defined as LVEF <50% and recovered LVEF as LVEF >50%.
Results
Of the 1.
092 patients included, 250 (22.
8%) had LVD.
Of these, adequate follow-up was only achieved in 188, which were the ones included in the analysis.
At 6 months, 86 patients (45.
7%) had RLVEF.
Table 1 shows the baseline characteristics of patients with RLVEF versus those who did not.
No significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of comorbidity, procedural complications, or discharge therapy.
There were no differences in baseline LVEF or severity of aortic valve disease, although the transaortic peak gradient (63.
9±15.
6 vs 73.
6±19.
7; p=0.
019) and transaortic mean peak gradient (38.
7±11.
2 vs 45±12.
7; P=0.
026) were significantly higher in the RLVEF group.
On the other hand, the group where the LVEF did not recover presented a higher percentage of moderate-severe mitral regurgitation (MR) (25.
4 vs 8.
1; p=0.
005).
These data could explain a more advanced state of cardiomyopathy and be an explanation for the different evolution of LVEF.
In the multivariate analysis, only moderate-severe MR was associated as a predictor of non-recovery of LVEF after TAVI (HR 1.
12; (1.
09–1.
45); p=0.
023).
During follow-up RLVEF was associated with a reduction in long-term all-cause mortality (p<0.
001) (Figure 1)
Conclusions
Up to 25% of patients undergoing TAVI have baseline LVD.
Of these, almost half recover it within six months.
Patients who recover LVEF have a significant reduction in mortality in the medium term.
The presence of a moderate-severe MR was associated with the non-recovery of LVEF after TAVI, probably because it was a more advanced cardiomyopathy.
Funding Acknowledgement
Type of funding sources: None.
Related Results
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Abstarct
Introduction
Isolated brain hydatid disease (BHD) is an extremely rare form of echinococcosis. A prompt and timely diagnosis is a crucial step in disease management. This ...
Emerging Evidence of IgG4-Related Disease in Pericarditis: A Systematic Review
Emerging Evidence of IgG4-Related Disease in Pericarditis: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction
Immunoglobulin G4-related disease (IgG4-RD) is a recently identified immune-mediated condition that is debilitating and often overlooked. While IgG4-RD has be...
Incidence, Outcomes and Predictors of Aortic Regurgitation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Al Azhar University Hospitals and National Heart Institute, Egypt
Incidence, Outcomes and Predictors of Aortic Regurgitation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Al Azhar University Hospitals and National Heart Institute, Egypt
Background: Aortic regurgitation (AR), which has ill-defined predictors and an unknown long-term influence on outcomes, is a significant transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAV...
Abstract 4369914: Successful Transfemoral TAVR in a Patient with Chronic Aortic Dissection and Severe Aortic Insufficiency
Abstract 4369914: Successful Transfemoral TAVR in a Patient with Chronic Aortic Dissection and Severe Aortic Insufficiency
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement is a well-established treatment for high-surgical-risk patients with severe aortic disease, providing a less invasive alternative to traditio...
Valve-Sparing Aortic Root Replacement by Congenital Heart Surgeons: A Single Center Experience.
Valve-Sparing Aortic Root Replacement by Congenital Heart Surgeons: A Single Center Experience.
Background
Aortic root dilatation and aortic insufficiency can
occur in patients with prior conotruncal defect surgery, the Ross
procedure, and connective tissue ...
AORTIC ROOT ANEURYSM OR ECTASIA TREATED WITH AORTIC ROOT WRAPPED PROCEDURE
AORTIC ROOT ANEURYSM OR ECTASIA TREATED WITH AORTIC ROOT WRAPPED PROCEDURE
Objectives
To develop a relatively simple and effective and less risk operation, aortic root wrapped procedure, to treat with aortic root aneurysm or ectasia.
...
The mid-term outcomes of aortic root replacement after surgical repair for CHD
The mid-term outcomes of aortic root replacement after surgical repair for CHD
AbstractObjective:The purpose of this study is to assess the mid-term outcomes of aortic root replacement after repair of CHDs.Method:This is a single-institutional retrospective, ...
Prevalence of Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis, Low Flow And Preserved Ejection Fraction: Results From a Cath-Lab Data Base.
Prevalence of Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis, Low Flow And Preserved Ejection Fraction: Results From a Cath-Lab Data Base.
Abstract
Recent echocardiographic studies described that almost 30% of patients with severe aortic valve stenosis on the basis of aortic valve area may paradoxica...

