Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Defining success in open source hardware development projects: a survey of practitioners
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Recent years have seen the rise of citizens as contributors to hardware product creation. This trend has increased attention to open source hardware (OSH): a phenomenon that extends the intellectual property management and development practices in open source software (OSS) into the design of physical objects. OSH projects are different from OSS projects due to product type, and distinct from traditional closed source new product development (NPD) ones due to their openness. These differences challenge the degree of applicability of existing project success definitions in the OSH context. To investigate project success in OSH, we conducted a qualitative survey with practitioners. We report characteristics of successful OSH projects through three identified themes: (a) value creation – the big-picture impact, (b) quality of output – the quality of the hardware and accompanying documentation and (c) project process – activities that contribute to success. We contextualise by comparing OSH with selected literature on the success of OSS and NPD project management. While our study confirms a similarity between OSS and OSH in defining project success, it also highlights themes that are uniquely important to the latter. These findings are helpful for OSH development practice and could provide lessons for OSS development and closed source NPD.
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Title: Defining success in open source hardware development projects: a survey of practitioners
Description:
Abstract
Recent years have seen the rise of citizens as contributors to hardware product creation.
This trend has increased attention to open source hardware (OSH): a phenomenon that extends the intellectual property management and development practices in open source software (OSS) into the design of physical objects.
OSH projects are different from OSS projects due to product type, and distinct from traditional closed source new product development (NPD) ones due to their openness.
These differences challenge the degree of applicability of existing project success definitions in the OSH context.
To investigate project success in OSH, we conducted a qualitative survey with practitioners.
We report characteristics of successful OSH projects through three identified themes: (a) value creation – the big-picture impact, (b) quality of output – the quality of the hardware and accompanying documentation and (c) project process – activities that contribute to success.
We contextualise by comparing OSH with selected literature on the success of OSS and NPD project management.
While our study confirms a similarity between OSS and OSH in defining project success, it also highlights themes that are uniquely important to the latter.
These findings are helpful for OSH development practice and could provide lessons for OSS development and closed source NPD.
Related Results
Performance simulation methodologies for hardware/software co-designed processors
Performance simulation methodologies for hardware/software co-designed processors
Recently the community started looking into Hardware/Software (HW/SW) co-designed processors as potential solutions to move towards the less power consuming and the less complex de...
Virtualizable hardware/software design infrastructure for dynamically partially reconfigurable systems
Virtualizable hardware/software design infrastructure for dynamically partially reconfigurable systems
In most existing works, reconfigurable hardware modules are still managed as conventional hardware devices. Further, the software reconfiguration overhead incurred by loading corre...
Common Pool Resource in Open-Source Software Projects: The Contributor Energy Framework
Common Pool Resource in Open-Source Software Projects: The Contributor Energy Framework
Open-source software (OSS) has been intensively studied by researchers to understand predictors of long-term success and sustainability, though less attention has been paid to what...
Singularity#1 and MFA II. Singularität Nr. 1 und MFA II.
Singularity#1 and MFA II. Singularität Nr. 1 und MFA II.
AbstractThe Dog-Ears formal system (Bheemaiah, n.d.) is extended with MFA II architecture for the definition of Taskoids, needing adaptable designs and additive printing. We presen...
Impact of Leadership Styles on Government Construction Project Success: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach
Impact of Leadership Styles on Government Construction Project Success: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach
Government construction projects play an important role in both developed and developing countries. They contribute about 80% of total capital assets, 10 % of GDP, and more than 50...
perangkat sumber daya manusia (brainware)
perangkat sumber daya manusia (brainware)
Dalam dunia komputer ada tiga objek yang terlibat didalamnya, seperti hardware, software dan brainware. Software adalah perangkat lunak yang digunakan pada hardware, hardware adala...
ANALYSIS AND PRIORITIZING RISK MINIMIZING TECHNIQUES OF IT PROJECTS
ANALYSIS AND PRIORITIZING RISK MINIMIZING TECHNIQUES OF IT PROJECTS
This article is devoted to the risk analysis of IT projects. The article defines the risks of IT projects, classifies the key risks of IT projects and identifies the main sources o...
Prescribing techniques of KwaZulu-Natal homoeopathic practitioners for paediatric patients
Prescribing techniques of KwaZulu-Natal homoeopathic practitioners for paediatric patients
Introduction The homoeopathic practice is polarised between the theoretical foundations of traditional homoeopathy and the contemporary practices as employed by homoeopathic practi...

