Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Beyond deterministic hydrological modelling: a copula-based uncertainty framework
View through CrossRef
Conceptual hydrological models are widely used in both theoretical investigations and operational applications. Their flexibility and relative ease of implementation have contributed to their success in the last decades. Despite their widespread use, conceptual hydrological models are still predominantly applied in a deterministic form (D-model), without explicitly accounting for the inherent uncertainties affecting their predictions. To address this limitation, a broad range of uncertainty estimation methods has been proposed in the literature, spanning from simple resampling techniques to more complex Bayesian frameworks, from approaches that explicitly separate different sources of uncertainty, to methods that aggregate all sources into a single error term. The common objective of these approaches is the transition from a deterministic D-model to a probabilistic or stochastic representation (S-model), typically expressed through an ensemble of model output predictions.Recently, Koutsoyiannis and Montanari (Koutsoyiannis, D., & Montanari, A., 2022) introduced an innovative methodology, applied to river discharge model outputs, to tackle this problem, departing from the traditional residual-based paradigm adopted by most existing approaches. Their method, known as BLUECAT, instead exploits the dependence structure between D-model predictions and observed discharge, providing a local, data-driven characterization of predictive uncertainty. While the non-parametric nature of BLUECAT offers important advantages, it also entails intrinsic limitations, particularly in the representation of uncertainty near the extremes of the discharge distribution, especially when limited discharge records are available.This contribution builds upon the original BLUECAT framework by proposing a conceptually equivalent, yet operationally novel, parametric post-processing approach for conceptual rainfall–runoff uncertainty estimation. The method relies on the use of parametric copula models to describe the joint dependence between D-model predictions and discharge observations, enabling the analytical derivation of conditional predictive distributions. This formulation provides an elegant solution to several limitations of the non-parametric approach, including the definition of confidence bands in proximity to extreme flows. In addition, a second parametric variant specifically tailored to high-flow regimes is introduced, allowing for a focused characterization of uncertainty within a restricted range of D-model discharge predictions.The proposed methods are evaluated through a comparative study over 24 mountainous catchments in the Piedmont region (north-western Italy), considering both calibration and validation periods. The analysis includes reliability metrics for confidence bounds as well as performance indicators for key ensemble properties, such as the ensemble median. The results indicate that the parametric approaches, when short observation records are available, generally yield more robust and reliable uncertainty estimates during validation compared to the original non-parametric BLUECAT. Furthermore, the high-flow-tailored approach outperforms both the non-parametric method and the parametric approach applied over the full discharge range when focusing on extreme flows, thereby improving uncertainty quantification in high-risk hydrological scenarios. Koutsoyiannis, D., & Montanari, A. (2022). Bluecat: A local uncertainty estimator for deterministic simulations and predictions. Water Resources Research, 58, e2021WR031215. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR031215
Title: Beyond deterministic hydrological modelling: a copula-based uncertainty framework
Description:
Conceptual hydrological models are widely used in both theoretical investigations and operational applications.
Their flexibility and relative ease of implementation have contributed to their success in the last decades.
Despite their widespread use, conceptual hydrological models are still predominantly applied in a deterministic form (D-model), without explicitly accounting for the inherent uncertainties affecting their predictions.
To address this limitation, a broad range of uncertainty estimation methods has been proposed in the literature, spanning from simple resampling techniques to more complex Bayesian frameworks, from approaches that explicitly separate different sources of uncertainty, to methods that aggregate all sources into a single error term.
The common objective of these approaches is the transition from a deterministic D-model to a probabilistic or stochastic representation (S-model), typically expressed through an ensemble of model output predictions.
Recently, Koutsoyiannis and Montanari (Koutsoyiannis, D.
, & Montanari, A.
, 2022) introduced an innovative methodology, applied to river discharge model outputs, to tackle this problem, departing from the traditional residual-based paradigm adopted by most existing approaches.
Their method, known as BLUECAT, instead exploits the dependence structure between D-model predictions and observed discharge, providing a local, data-driven characterization of predictive uncertainty.
While the non-parametric nature of BLUECAT offers important advantages, it also entails intrinsic limitations, particularly in the representation of uncertainty near the extremes of the discharge distribution, especially when limited discharge records are available.
This contribution builds upon the original BLUECAT framework by proposing a conceptually equivalent, yet operationally novel, parametric post-processing approach for conceptual rainfall–runoff uncertainty estimation.
The method relies on the use of parametric copula models to describe the joint dependence between D-model predictions and discharge observations, enabling the analytical derivation of conditional predictive distributions.
This formulation provides an elegant solution to several limitations of the non-parametric approach, including the definition of confidence bands in proximity to extreme flows.
In addition, a second parametric variant specifically tailored to high-flow regimes is introduced, allowing for a focused characterization of uncertainty within a restricted range of D-model discharge predictions.
The proposed methods are evaluated through a comparative study over 24 mountainous catchments in the Piedmont region (north-western Italy), considering both calibration and validation periods.
The analysis includes reliability metrics for confidence bounds as well as performance indicators for key ensemble properties, such as the ensemble median.
The results indicate that the parametric approaches, when short observation records are available, generally yield more robust and reliable uncertainty estimates during validation compared to the original non-parametric BLUECAT.
Furthermore, the high-flow-tailored approach outperforms both the non-parametric method and the parametric approach applied over the full discharge range when focusing on extreme flows, thereby improving uncertainty quantification in high-risk hydrological scenarios.
Koutsoyiannis, D.
, & Montanari, A.
(2022).
Bluecat: A local uncertainty estimator for deterministic simulations and predictions.
Water Resources Research, 58, e2021WR031215.
https://doi.
org/10.
1029/2021WR031215.
Related Results
Constraining simulation uncertainties in a hydrological model of the Congo River Basin including a combined modelling approach for channel-wetland exchanges
Constraining simulation uncertainties in a hydrological model of the Congo River Basin including a combined modelling approach for channel-wetland exchanges
Compared to other large river basins of the world, such as the Amazon, the Congo River Basin appears to be the most ungauged and less studied. This is partly because the basin lack...
Attia-1 and Attia-2 New Archimedean Bivariate Copulas Modeling Positive Dependency
Attia-1 and Attia-2 New Archimedean Bivariate Copulas Modeling Positive Dependency
In this paper, the author introduces new methods to construct Archimedean copulas. The generator of each copula fulfills the sufficient conditions as regards the boundary and being...
New Perspectives for 3D Visualization of Dynamic Reservoir Uncertainty
New Perspectives for 3D Visualization of Dynamic Reservoir Uncertainty
This reference is for an abstract only. A full paper was not submitted for this conference.
Abstract
1 Int...
Trivariate copula to design coastal structures
Trivariate copula to design coastal structures
Abstract. Some coastal structures must be redesigned in the future due to rising sea levels caused by global warming. The design of structures subjected to the actions of waves req...
Reserves Uncertainty Calculation Accounting for Parameter Uncertainty
Reserves Uncertainty Calculation Accounting for Parameter Uncertainty
Abstract
An important goal of geostatistical modeling is to assess output uncertainty after processing realizations through a transfer function, in particular, to...
The uncertainty–investment relationship: scrutinizing the role of firm size
The uncertainty–investment relationship: scrutinizing the role of firm size
PurposeThe objective of this paper is threefold. First, it aims to empirically study whether firm-specific/idiosyncratic uncertainty, macroeconomic/aggregate uncertainty and politi...
Comparison of generalized estimating equations and Gaussian copula regression results using data from the randomized control trial
Comparison of generalized estimating equations and Gaussian copula regression results using data from the randomized control trial
Abstract
Background:
In repeated measures data the observations tend to be correlated within each subject and such data are often analysed using Generalized Estimating Equ...

