Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Individual lifetime benefit from low-dose colchicine in patients with chronic coronary artery disease
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Aims
Low-dose colchicine reduces cardiovascular risk in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), but absolute benefits may vary between individuals. This study aimed to assess the range of individual absolute benefits from low-dose colchicine according to patient risk profile.
Methods and results
The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guideline–recommended SMART-REACH model was combined with the relative treatment effect of low-dose colchicine and applied to patients with CAD from the Low-Dose Colchicine 2 (LoDoCo2) trial and the Utrecht Cardiovascular Cohort-Second Manifestations of ARTerial disease (UCC-SMART) study (n = 10 830). Individual treatment benefits were expressed as 10-year absolute risk reductions (ARRs) for myocardial infarction, stroke, or cardiovascular death (MACE), and MACE-free life-years gained. Predictions were also performed for MACE plus coronary revascularization (MACE+), using a new lifetime model derived in the REduction of Atherothrombosis for Continued Health (REACH) registry. Colchicine was compared with other ESC guideline–recommended intensified (Step 2) prevention strategies, i.e. LDL cholesterol (LDL-c) reduction to 1.4 mmol/L and systolic blood pressure (SBP) reduction to 130 mmHg. The generalizability to other populations was assessed in patients with CAD from REACH North America and Western Europe (n = 25 812). The median 10-year ARR from low-dose colchicine was 4.6% [interquartile range (IQR) 3.6–6.0%] for MACE and 8.6% (IQR 7.6–9.8%) for MACE+. Lifetime benefit was 2.0 (IQR 1.6–2.5) MACE-free years, and 3.4 (IQR 2.6–4.2) MACE+-free life-years gained. For LDL-c and SBP reduction, respectively, the median 10-year ARR for MACE was 3.0% (IQR 1.5–5.1%) and 1.7% (IQR 0.0–5.7%), and the lifetime benefit was 1.2 (IQR 0.6–2.1) and 0.7 (IQR 0.0–2.3) MACE-free life-years gained. Similar results were obtained for MACE+ and in American and European patients from REACH.
Conclusion
The absolute benefits of low-dose colchicine vary between individual patients with chronic CAD. They may be expected to be of at least similar magnitude to those of intensified LDL-c and SBP reduction in a majority of patients already on conventional lipid-lowering and blood pressure–lowering therapy.
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Pascal M Burger
Jannick A N Dorresteijn
Aernoud T L Fiolet
Stefan Koudstaal
John W Eikelboom
Stefan M Nidorf
Peter L Thompson
Jan H Cornel
Charley A Budgeon
Iris C D Westendorp
Driek P W Beelen
Fabrice M A C Martens
Philippe Gabriel Steg
Folkert W Asselbergs
Maarten J Cramer
Martin Teraa
Deepak L Bhatt
Frank L J Visseren
Arend Mosterd
S M Nidorf
X F Xu
M A Ireland
D Latchem
A Whelan
R Hendriks
P Salkani
I W Tan
A G Thompson
A M Morton
B E Hockings
P L Thompson
B King
J H Cornel
H Bakker-Lohmeijer
A Mosterd
P Bunschoten
S H K The
S van der Kooi
T Lenderink
R G J L Lardinois
P A M Hoogslag
A de Vos
A Jerzewski
S Jansen
P R Nierop
M van der Knaap
H P Swart
R Kingma
J Schaap
L B Blom
A F M Kuijper
E Bayraktar-Verver
M W J van Hessen
W C T C Engelen
J W M van Eck
N van der Ven-Elzebroek
J M C van Hal
I M J Drost
F R den Hartog
D van Wijk
E van Beek
C van der Horst
L Bartels
M Hendriks
C de Nooijer
C Welten
E Ronner
A Dijkshoorn
F J Prins
R N A Rutten
D P W Beele
I Hendriks
A van der Sluis
E A Badings
I C D Westendorp
A Melein
Tj J Römer
P Bruines
R van de Wal
I Leenders - van Lieshout
M E W Hemels
K Meinen-Werner
M R de Groot
G Post
M W C Mulder
S Stuij
E van Nes
P Luyten
J Plomp
S V Veldmeijer
M J Asselman
P A Scholtus
F W Asselbergs
M J Cramer
M G van der Meer
H M Nathoe
G J de Borst
M L Bots
M H Emmelot-Vonk
P A de Jong
A T Lely
N P van der Kaaij
L J Kappelle
Y M Ruigrok
M C Verhaar
F L J Visseren
J A N Dorresteijn
D L Bhatt
P G Steg
E M Ohman
J Röther
P W F Wilson
M J Alberts
D L Bhatt
R D’Agostino
K A Eagle
S Goto
A T Hirsch
C S Liau
J L Mas
E M Ohman
J Röther
S C Smith
P G Steg
P W F Wilson
Title: Individual lifetime benefit from low-dose colchicine in patients with chronic coronary artery disease
Description:
Abstract
Aims
Low-dose colchicine reduces cardiovascular risk in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), but absolute benefits may vary between individuals.
This study aimed to assess the range of individual absolute benefits from low-dose colchicine according to patient risk profile.
Methods and results
The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guideline–recommended SMART-REACH model was combined with the relative treatment effect of low-dose colchicine and applied to patients with CAD from the Low-Dose Colchicine 2 (LoDoCo2) trial and the Utrecht Cardiovascular Cohort-Second Manifestations of ARTerial disease (UCC-SMART) study (n = 10 830).
Individual treatment benefits were expressed as 10-year absolute risk reductions (ARRs) for myocardial infarction, stroke, or cardiovascular death (MACE), and MACE-free life-years gained.
Predictions were also performed for MACE plus coronary revascularization (MACE+), using a new lifetime model derived in the REduction of Atherothrombosis for Continued Health (REACH) registry.
Colchicine was compared with other ESC guideline–recommended intensified (Step 2) prevention strategies, i.
e.
LDL cholesterol (LDL-c) reduction to 1.
4 mmol/L and systolic blood pressure (SBP) reduction to 130 mmHg.
The generalizability to other populations was assessed in patients with CAD from REACH North America and Western Europe (n = 25 812).
The median 10-year ARR from low-dose colchicine was 4.
6% [interquartile range (IQR) 3.
6–6.
0%] for MACE and 8.
6% (IQR 7.
6–9.
8%) for MACE+.
Lifetime benefit was 2.
0 (IQR 1.
6–2.
5) MACE-free years, and 3.
4 (IQR 2.
6–4.
2) MACE+-free life-years gained.
For LDL-c and SBP reduction, respectively, the median 10-year ARR for MACE was 3.
0% (IQR 1.
5–5.
1%) and 1.
7% (IQR 0.
0–5.
7%), and the lifetime benefit was 1.
2 (IQR 0.
6–2.
1) and 0.
7 (IQR 0.
0–2.
3) MACE-free life-years gained.
Similar results were obtained for MACE+ and in American and European patients from REACH.
Conclusion
The absolute benefits of low-dose colchicine vary between individual patients with chronic CAD.
They may be expected to be of at least similar magnitude to those of intensified LDL-c and SBP reduction in a majority of patients already on conventional lipid-lowering and blood pressure–lowering therapy.
Related Results
Emerging Evidence of IgG4-Related Disease in Pericarditis: A Systematic Review
Emerging Evidence of IgG4-Related Disease in Pericarditis: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction
Immunoglobulin G4-related disease (IgG4-RD) is a recently identified immune-mediated condition that is debilitating and often overlooked. While IgG4-RD has be...
Early Onset of Coronary Subclavian Steal Syndrome: A Case Report and Literature Review
Early Onset of Coronary Subclavian Steal Syndrome: A Case Report and Literature Review
Abstract
Introduction
Coronary subclavian steal syndrome (CSSS) is a rare phenomenon that often goes undiagnosed and causes severe complications, including death. This report prese...
e0543 Clinical and coronary angiography characteristics between young (<45) and old (>60) patients with coronary artery disease
e0543 Clinical and coronary angiography characteristics between young (<45) and old (>60) patients with coronary artery disease
Objective
To study the clinical Clinical and coronary angiography characteristics between young (≤45) and old (>60) patients with coronary artery disease.
...
e0425 Clinical and coronary angiography characteristics between young (≤45) and old (>60) patients with coronary artery disease
e0425 Clinical and coronary angiography characteristics between young (≤45) and old (>60) patients with coronary artery disease
Objective
To study the clinical Clinical and coronary angiography characteristics between young (≤45) and old (>60) patients with coronary artery disease.
...
A study on risk factors of coronary artery disease in Chong Qing city
A study on risk factors of coronary artery disease in Chong Qing city
Objective
To investigate the relationship between risk factors and coronary artery disease in Chong Qing city, and to provide scientific basis for preventing and ...
Is there value in prescribing colchicine in coronary artery disease for secondary prevention: a meta-analysis of over 5,000 patients
Is there value in prescribing colchicine in coronary artery disease for secondary prevention: a meta-analysis of over 5,000 patients
Abstract
Introduction
Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) is the single greatest cause of mortality and loss of disability adjusted li...
The role of colchicine in the management of COVID-19: a Meta-analysis
The role of colchicine in the management of COVID-19: a Meta-analysis
Abstract
Background
The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has robustly affected the global healthcare and econ...
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract
Introduction
Tarlatamab is a Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) -directed bispecific T-cell engager recently approved for use in patients with advanced small cell lung cancer (SCL...

