Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Differential Benefit of Immune Checkpoint Blockade by KRAS Mutation Status in Metastatic Lung Adenocarcinoma: Validation from an Extended Swedish Cohort

View through CrossRef
Abstract Introduction Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) is a standard first-line treatment for advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without actionable oncogenic alterations. KRAS mutations, prevalent in 30–40% of Western lung adenocarcinomas, currently lack targeted first-line therapies. This study aimed to assess the predictive value of KRAS mutations for clinical outcomes following ICB, validating previous findings in a larger cohort with extended follow-up. Methods We conducted a retrospective multicenter study including consecutive stage IV NSCLC adenocarcinoma patients ( n = 424) treated with either ICB or platinum-doublet chemotherapy between 2016–2021 in western Sweden. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, treatment details, and survival outcomes were retrospectively collected from patient charts and the Swedish National Lung Cancer Registry. KRAS mutational status was assessed by next-generation sequencing. Primary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariate Cox regression. Results Among 424 patients, 40% harbored KRAS mutations ( KRAS MUT ). KRAS MUT patients showed significant improvement in OS (16 vs. 8 months, p < 0.001) and PFS (8 vs. 5 months, p < 0.001) with ICB monotherapy compared to chemotherapy. Multivariate analyses confirmed KRAS mutation as an independent predictor for better OS (HR 0.533, p = 0.018) and PFS (HR 0.523, p = 0.018). In contrast, KRAS wild-type ( KRAS WT ) patients derived no survival advantage from ICB monotherapy. Both KRAS WT with KRAS MUT populations benefited from chemoimmunotherapy. Conclusions KRAS mutations predict substantial and sustained clinical benefit from first-line ICB monotherapy in advanced NSCLC, whereas KRAS wild-type patients do not. Integrating KRAS mutation status into clinical practice could guide personalized treatment strategies, optimizing immunotherapy outcomes in advanced-stage lung adenocarcinoma.
Title: Differential Benefit of Immune Checkpoint Blockade by KRAS Mutation Status in Metastatic Lung Adenocarcinoma: Validation from an Extended Swedish Cohort
Description:
Abstract Introduction Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) is a standard first-line treatment for advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without actionable oncogenic alterations.
KRAS mutations, prevalent in 30–40% of Western lung adenocarcinomas, currently lack targeted first-line therapies.
This study aimed to assess the predictive value of KRAS mutations for clinical outcomes following ICB, validating previous findings in a larger cohort with extended follow-up.
Methods We conducted a retrospective multicenter study including consecutive stage IV NSCLC adenocarcinoma patients ( n = 424) treated with either ICB or platinum-doublet chemotherapy between 2016–2021 in western Sweden.
Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, treatment details, and survival outcomes were retrospectively collected from patient charts and the Swedish National Lung Cancer Registry.
KRAS mutational status was assessed by next-generation sequencing.
Primary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariate Cox regression.
Results Among 424 patients, 40% harbored KRAS mutations ( KRAS MUT ).
KRAS MUT patients showed significant improvement in OS (16 vs.
8 months, p < 0.
001) and PFS (8 vs.
5 months, p < 0.
001) with ICB monotherapy compared to chemotherapy.
Multivariate analyses confirmed KRAS mutation as an independent predictor for better OS (HR 0.
533, p = 0.
018) and PFS (HR 0.
523, p = 0.
018).
In contrast, KRAS wild-type ( KRAS WT ) patients derived no survival advantage from ICB monotherapy.
Both KRAS WT with KRAS MUT populations benefited from chemoimmunotherapy.
Conclusions KRAS mutations predict substantial and sustained clinical benefit from first-line ICB monotherapy in advanced NSCLC, whereas KRAS wild-type patients do not.
Integrating KRAS mutation status into clinical practice could guide personalized treatment strategies, optimizing immunotherapy outcomes in advanced-stage lung adenocarcinoma.

Related Results

Kras Plays An Important Role In Generating Differentiated Blood Cells
Kras Plays An Important Role In Generating Differentiated Blood Cells
Abstract Background Kras is a small GTPase essential for mouse embryonic development. Although Kras-/- fetal liver cells reconst...
Complex Collision Tumors: A Systematic Review
Complex Collision Tumors: A Systematic Review
Abstract Introduction: A collision tumor consists of two distinct neoplastic components located within the same organ, separated by stromal tissue, without histological intermixing...
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract Introduction Tarlatamab is a Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) -directed bispecific T-cell engager recently approved for use in patients with advanced small cell lung cancer (SCL...
Tracking emerging KRAS, BRAF and EGFR mutations through ccfDNA in colorectal cancers treated with EGFR blockade.
Tracking emerging KRAS, BRAF and EGFR mutations through ccfDNA in colorectal cancers treated with EGFR blockade.
547 Background: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) blockade can achieve considerable tumor shrinkage in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). However, most patien...

Back to Top