Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Risk of transmission of sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease by surgical procedures: systematic reviews and quality of evidence
View through CrossRef
Background: Sporadic Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease (sCJD) is potentially transmissible to humans. Objective: This study aimed to summarise and rate the quality of the evidence of the association between surgery and sCJD. Design and methods: Firstly, we conducted systematic reviews and meta-analyses of case–control studies with major surgical procedures as exposures under study. To assess quality of evidence, we used the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) approach. Secondly, we conducted a systematic review of sCJD case reports after sharing neurosurgical instruments. Results: Thirteen case–control studies met the inclusion criteria for the systematic review of case–control studies. sCJD was positively associated with heart surgery, heart and vascular surgery and eye surgery, negatively associated with tonsillectomy and appendectomy, and not associated with neurosurgery or unspecified major surgery. The overall quality of evidence was rated as very low. A single case–control study with a low risk of bias found a strong association between surgery conducted more than 20 years before disease onset and sCJD. Seven cases were described as potentially transmitted by reused neurosurgical instruments. Conclusion: The association between surgery and sCJD remains uncertain. Measures currently recommended for preventing sCJD transmission should be strongly maintained. Future studies should focus on the potential association between sCJD and surgery undergone a long time previously.
European Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (ECDC)
Title: Risk of transmission of sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease by surgical procedures: systematic reviews and quality of evidence
Description:
Background: Sporadic Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease (sCJD) is potentially transmissible to humans.
Objective: This study aimed to summarise and rate the quality of the evidence of the association between surgery and sCJD.
Design and methods: Firstly, we conducted systematic reviews and meta-analyses of case–control studies with major surgical procedures as exposures under study.
To assess quality of evidence, we used the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) approach.
Secondly, we conducted a systematic review of sCJD case reports after sharing neurosurgical instruments.
Results: Thirteen case–control studies met the inclusion criteria for the systematic review of case–control studies.
sCJD was positively associated with heart surgery, heart and vascular surgery and eye surgery, negatively associated with tonsillectomy and appendectomy, and not associated with neurosurgery or unspecified major surgery.
The overall quality of evidence was rated as very low.
A single case–control study with a low risk of bias found a strong association between surgery conducted more than 20 years before disease onset and sCJD.
Seven cases were described as potentially transmitted by reused neurosurgical instruments.
Conclusion: The association between surgery and sCJD remains uncertain.
Measures currently recommended for preventing sCJD transmission should be strongly maintained.
Future studies should focus on the potential association between sCJD and surgery undergone a long time previously.
Related Results
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Abstarct
Introduction
Isolated brain hydatid disease (BHD) is an extremely rare form of echinococcosis. A prompt and timely diagnosis is a crucial step in disease management. This ...
[RETRACTED] Keanu Reeves CBD Gummies v1
[RETRACTED] Keanu Reeves CBD Gummies v1
[RETRACTED]Keanu Reeves CBD Gummies ==❱❱ Huge Discounts:[HURRY UP ] Absolute Keanu Reeves CBD Gummies (Available)Order Online Only!! ❰❰= https://www.facebook.com/Keanu-Reeves-CBD-G...
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
This review summarizes the evidence from six randomized controlled trials that judged the effectiveness of systematic review summaries on policymakers' decision making, or the most...
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract
The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical a...
Sporadic Creutzfeldt–Jakob Disease
Sporadic Creutzfeldt–Jakob Disease
Abstract
Sporadic Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease is a rare and fatal human prion disease characterized by a rapidly progressive dementia, myoclonus, cerebellar, pyrami...
Searching and reporting in Campbell Collaboration systematic reviews: A systematic assessment of current methods
Searching and reporting in Campbell Collaboration systematic reviews: A systematic assessment of current methods
AbstractThe search methods used in systematic reviews provide the foundation for establishing the body of literature from which conclusions are drawn and recommendations made. Sear...
Use of Personal Protective Equipment in General Practice and Ambulance settings: a rapid review
Use of Personal Protective Equipment in General Practice and Ambulance settings: a rapid review
Abstract
The use of personal protective equipment (PPE) is a cornerstone of infection prevention and control guidelines and was of increased importance during the C...
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction
Fibroadenoma is the most common benign breast lesion; however, it carries a potential risk of malignant transformation. This systematic review provides an ove...

