Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Does the time of the day affect multiple trauma care in hospitals? A retrospective analysis of data from the TraumaRegister DGU®
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Background
Optimal multiple trauma care should be continuously provided during the day and night. Several studies have demonstrated worse outcomes and higher mortality in patients admitted at night. This study involved the analysis of a population of multiple trauma patients admitted at night and a comparison of various indicators of the quality of care at different admission times.
Methods
Data from 58,939 multiple trauma patients from 2007 to 2017 were analyzed retrospectively. All data were obtained from TraumaRegister DGU®. Patients were grouped by the time of their admission to the trauma center (6.00 am–11.59 am (morning), 12.00 pm–5.59 pm (afternoon), 6.00 pm–11.59 pm (evening), 0.00 am–5.59 am (night)). Incidences, patient demographics, injury patterns, trauma center levels and trauma care times and outcomes were evaluated.
Results
Fewer patients were admitted during the night (6.00 pm–11.59 pm: 18.8% of the patients, 0.00–5.59 am: 4.6% of the patients) than during the day. Patients who arrived between 0.00 am–5.59 am were younger (49.4 ± 22.8 years) and had a higher injury severity score (ISS) (21.4 ± 11.5) and lower Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score (11.6 ± 4.4) than those admitted during the day (12.00 pm–05.59 pm; age: 55.3 ± 21.6 years, ISS: 20.6 ± 11.4, GCS: 12.6 ± 4.0). Time in the trauma department and time to an emergency operation were only marginally different. Time to imaging was slightly prolonged during the night (0.00 am–5.59 am: X-ray 16.2 ± 19.8 min; CT scan 24.3 ± 18.1 min versus 12.00 pm- 5.59 pm: X-ray 15.4 ± 19.7 min; CT scan 22.5 ± 17.8 min), but the delay did not affect the outcome. The outcome was also not affected by level of the trauma center. There was no relevant difference in the Revised Injury Severity Classification II (RISC II) score or mortality rate between patients admitted during the day and at night. There were no differences in RISC II scores or mortality rates according to time period. Admission at night was not a predictor of a higher mortality rate.
Conclusion
The patient population and injury severity vary between the day and night with regard to age, injury pattern and trauma mechanism. Despite the differences in these factors, arrival at night did not have a negative effect on the outcome.
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Title: Does the time of the day affect multiple trauma care in hospitals? A retrospective analysis of data from the TraumaRegister DGU®
Description:
Abstract
Background
Optimal multiple trauma care should be continuously provided during the day and night.
Several studies have demonstrated worse outcomes and higher mortality in patients admitted at night.
This study involved the analysis of a population of multiple trauma patients admitted at night and a comparison of various indicators of the quality of care at different admission times.
Methods
Data from 58,939 multiple trauma patients from 2007 to 2017 were analyzed retrospectively.
All data were obtained from TraumaRegister DGU®.
Patients were grouped by the time of their admission to the trauma center (6.
00 am–11.
59 am (morning), 12.
00 pm–5.
59 pm (afternoon), 6.
00 pm–11.
59 pm (evening), 0.
00 am–5.
59 am (night)).
Incidences, patient demographics, injury patterns, trauma center levels and trauma care times and outcomes were evaluated.
Results
Fewer patients were admitted during the night (6.
00 pm–11.
59 pm: 18.
8% of the patients, 0.
00–5.
59 am: 4.
6% of the patients) than during the day.
Patients who arrived between 0.
00 am–5.
59 am were younger (49.
4 ± 22.
8 years) and had a higher injury severity score (ISS) (21.
4 ± 11.
5) and lower Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score (11.
6 ± 4.
4) than those admitted during the day (12.
00 pm–05.
59 pm; age: 55.
3 ± 21.
6 years, ISS: 20.
6 ± 11.
4, GCS: 12.
6 ± 4.
0).
Time in the trauma department and time to an emergency operation were only marginally different.
Time to imaging was slightly prolonged during the night (0.
00 am–5.
59 am: X-ray 16.
2 ± 19.
8 min; CT scan 24.
3 ± 18.
1 min versus 12.
00 pm- 5.
59 pm: X-ray 15.
4 ± 19.
7 min; CT scan 22.
5 ± 17.
8 min), but the delay did not affect the outcome.
The outcome was also not affected by level of the trauma center.
There was no relevant difference in the Revised Injury Severity Classification II (RISC II) score or mortality rate between patients admitted during the day and at night.
There were no differences in RISC II scores or mortality rates according to time period.
Admission at night was not a predictor of a higher mortality rate.
Conclusion
The patient population and injury severity vary between the day and night with regard to age, injury pattern and trauma mechanism.
Despite the differences in these factors, arrival at night did not have a negative effect on the outcome.
Related Results
Blunt Chest Trauma and Chylothorax: A Systematic Review
Blunt Chest Trauma and Chylothorax: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction: Although traumatic chylothorax is predominantly associated with penetrating injuries, instances following blunt trauma, as a rare and challenging condition, ...
FAKTOR-FAKTOR YANG MEMPENGARUHI MORTALITAS PADA PASIEN DENGAN FRAKTUR COSTA: Literature Review
FAKTOR-FAKTOR YANG MEMPENGARUHI MORTALITAS PADA PASIEN DENGAN FRAKTUR COSTA: Literature Review
FAKTOR-FAKTOR YANG MEMPENGARUHI MORTALITAS PADA PASIEN DENGAN FRAKTUR COSTA: Literature Review Anna Tri Wahyuni1), Masfuri2), Liya Arista3)1,2,3 Fakultas Ilmu Keperawatan Univers...
The effect of trauma advanced practice nurse programme at a Level I regional trauma centre in mainland China
The effect of trauma advanced practice nurse programme at a Level I regional trauma centre in mainland China
AbstractAimsTrauma is the fifth‐leading cause of death in China. Despite the establishment of the Chinese Regional Trauma Care System (CRTCS) in 2016, advanced trauma nurse practic...
Trauma to the Abdomen and Pelvis
Trauma to the Abdomen and Pelvis
Abdominal trauma accounts for approximately 12% of all trauma. The evaluation of abdominal trauma is difficult as the patient may have concomitant distracting injuries or alteratio...
Trauma to the Abdomen and Pelvis
Trauma to the Abdomen and Pelvis
Abdominal trauma accounts for approximately 12% of all trauma. The evaluation of abdominal trauma is difficult as the patient may have concomitant distracting injuries or alteratio...
Artificial Intelligence in Trauma Management: Current Applications, Emerging Frontiers, and the Road Ahead
Artificial Intelligence in Trauma Management: Current Applications, Emerging Frontiers, and the Road Ahead
Editorial Trauma is still one of the most daunting public health dilemmas of the XXI century. Injuries are the leading cause of death (9.2% on a global level) and cause of disabili...
Artificial Intelligence in Trauma Management: Current Applications, Emerging Frontiers, and the Road Ahead
Artificial Intelligence in Trauma Management: Current Applications, Emerging Frontiers, and the Road Ahead
Editorial Trauma is still one of the most daunting public health dilemmas of the XXI century. Injuries are the leading cause of death (9.2% on a global level) and cause of disabili...
1049 When Nightmares Follow Trauma: Understanding Content, Severity, and Symptom Predictors
1049 When Nightmares Follow Trauma: Understanding Content, Severity, and Symptom Predictors
Abstract
Introduction
Nightmares are historically underreported despite strong links to insomnia, suicidal ideation, depr...

