Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Does the time of the day affect multiple trauma care in hospitals? A retrospective analysis of data from the TraumaRegister DGU®
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Background
Optimal multiple trauma care should be continuously provided during the day and night. Several studies have demonstrated worse outcomes and higher mortality in patients admitted at night. This study involved the analysis of a population of multiple trauma patients admitted at night and a comparison of various indicators of the quality of care at different admission times.
Methods
Data from 58,939 multiple trauma patients from 2007 to 2017 were analyzed retrospectively. All data were obtained from TraumaRegister DGU®. Patients were grouped by the time of their admission to the trauma center (6.00 am–11.59 am (morning), 12.00 pm–5.59 pm (afternoon), 6.00 pm–11.59 pm (evening), 0.00 am–5.59 am (night)). Incidences, patient demographics, injury patterns, trauma center levels and trauma care times and outcomes were evaluated.
Results
Fewer patients were admitted during the night (6.00 pm–11.59 pm: 18.8% of the patients, 0.00–5.59 am: 4.6% of the patients) than during the day. Patients who arrived between 0.00 am–5.59 am were younger (49.4 ± 22.8 years) and had a higher injury severity score (ISS) (21.4 ± 11.5) and lower Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score (11.6 ± 4.4) than those admitted during the day (12.00 pm–05.59 pm; age: 55.3 ± 21.6 years, ISS: 20.6 ± 11.4, GCS: 12.6 ± 4.0). Time in the trauma department and time to an emergency operation were only marginally different. Time to imaging was slightly prolonged during the night (0.00 am–5.59 am: X-ray 16.2 ± 19.8 min; CT scan 24.3 ± 18.1 min versus 12.00 pm- 5.59 pm: X-ray 15.4 ± 19.7 min; CT scan 22.5 ± 17.8 min), but the delay did not affect the outcome. The outcome was also not affected by level of the trauma center. There was no relevant difference in the Revised Injury Severity Classification II (RISC II) score or mortality rate between patients admitted during the day and at night. There were no differences in RISC II scores or mortality rates according to time period. Admission at night was not a predictor of a higher mortality rate.
Conclusion
The patient population and injury severity vary between the day and night with regard to age, injury pattern and trauma mechanism. Despite the differences in these factors, arrival at night did not have a negative effect on the outcome.
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Title: Does the time of the day affect multiple trauma care in hospitals? A retrospective analysis of data from the TraumaRegister DGU®
Description:
Abstract
Background
Optimal multiple trauma care should be continuously provided during the day and night.
Several studies have demonstrated worse outcomes and higher mortality in patients admitted at night.
This study involved the analysis of a population of multiple trauma patients admitted at night and a comparison of various indicators of the quality of care at different admission times.
Methods
Data from 58,939 multiple trauma patients from 2007 to 2017 were analyzed retrospectively.
All data were obtained from TraumaRegister DGU®.
Patients were grouped by the time of their admission to the trauma center (6.
00 am–11.
59 am (morning), 12.
00 pm–5.
59 pm (afternoon), 6.
00 pm–11.
59 pm (evening), 0.
00 am–5.
59 am (night)).
Incidences, patient demographics, injury patterns, trauma center levels and trauma care times and outcomes were evaluated.
Results
Fewer patients were admitted during the night (6.
00 pm–11.
59 pm: 18.
8% of the patients, 0.
00–5.
59 am: 4.
6% of the patients) than during the day.
Patients who arrived between 0.
00 am–5.
59 am were younger (49.
4 ± 22.
8 years) and had a higher injury severity score (ISS) (21.
4 ± 11.
5) and lower Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score (11.
6 ± 4.
4) than those admitted during the day (12.
00 pm–05.
59 pm; age: 55.
3 ± 21.
6 years, ISS: 20.
6 ± 11.
4, GCS: 12.
6 ± 4.
0).
Time in the trauma department and time to an emergency operation were only marginally different.
Time to imaging was slightly prolonged during the night (0.
00 am–5.
59 am: X-ray 16.
2 ± 19.
8 min; CT scan 24.
3 ± 18.
1 min versus 12.
00 pm- 5.
59 pm: X-ray 15.
4 ± 19.
7 min; CT scan 22.
5 ± 17.
8 min), but the delay did not affect the outcome.
The outcome was also not affected by level of the trauma center.
There was no relevant difference in the Revised Injury Severity Classification II (RISC II) score or mortality rate between patients admitted during the day and at night.
There were no differences in RISC II scores or mortality rates according to time period.
Admission at night was not a predictor of a higher mortality rate.
Conclusion
The patient population and injury severity vary between the day and night with regard to age, injury pattern and trauma mechanism.
Despite the differences in these factors, arrival at night did not have a negative effect on the outcome.
Related Results
The effect of trauma advanced practice nurse programme at a Level I regional trauma centre in mainland China
The effect of trauma advanced practice nurse programme at a Level I regional trauma centre in mainland China
AbstractAimsTrauma is the fifth‐leading cause of death in China. Despite the establishment of the Chinese Regional Trauma Care System (CRTCS) in 2016, advanced trauma nurse practic...
Market Shares for Rural Inpatient Surgical Services: Where Does the Buck Stop?
Market Shares for Rural Inpatient Surgical Services: Where Does the Buck Stop?
ABSTRACT:Utilization of surgical services by rural citizens is poorly understood, and few data are available about rural hospitals’surgical market shares and their financial implic...
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash
Abstract
This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
Hospitals That Serve Many Black Patients Have Lower Revenues and Profits: Structural Racism in Hospital Financing
Hospitals That Serve Many Black Patients Have Lower Revenues and Profits: Structural Racism in Hospital Financing
Abstract
Background
Care for Black patients is concentrated at a relatively small proportion of all US hospitals. Some previous studies have documen...
Poorer Nurse Staffing in Black-Serving Hospitals
Poorer Nurse Staffing in Black-Serving Hospitals
Background
Patients in hospitals that serve disproportionately patients of Black race have worse outcomes than patients in other hospitals, but the modifiable nursing f...
Trauma-Informed Care in Digital Health Technologies: Protocol for a Scoping Review (Preprint)
Trauma-Informed Care in Digital Health Technologies: Protocol for a Scoping Review (Preprint)
BACKGROUND
The use of digital health technologies is becoming increasingly common across the globe as they offer immense potential to enhance health care de...
Evolution of Antimicrobial Resistance in Community vs. Hospital-Acquired Infections
Evolution of Antimicrobial Resistance in Community vs. Hospital-Acquired Infections
Abstract
Introduction
Hospitals are high-risk environments for infections. Despite the global recognition of these pathogens, few studies compare microorganisms from community-acqu...
A Comparative Study of Chronic Subdural Hematoma in Patients With and Without Head Trauma
A Comparative Study of Chronic Subdural Hematoma in Patients With and Without Head Trauma
Abstract
Background: Clinical features in chronic subdural hematomas (CSDH) patients with and without history of head trauma are not clear. Here, we seek to investigate dif...

