Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Randomized phase II trial of gemcitabine and either day 1 or day 8 carboplatin for advanced non‐small‐cell lung cancer: Is thrombocytopenia predictable?
View through CrossRef
AbstractAim: Two 21‐day gemcitabine–carboplatin schedules were evaluated in patients with advanced non‐small cell lung cancer in order to assess the effect of timing of the carboplatin dose on toxicity and efficacy.Methods: Patients were randomized to gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 of a 21‐day cycle) and carboplatin (AUC 5, on day 1) (Carbo d1 arm) or the same gemcitabine schedule with carboplatin given on day 8 (Carbo d8 arm). Twenty patients with Stage IIIB or IV non‐small‐cell lung cancer were enrolled in each arm.Results: The achieved dose intensities of both gemcitabine and carboplatin were significantly higher in the Carbo d1 arm. The total rates of grade 3 or 4 hematological and non‐hematological toxicities (any toxicity, any cycle) were 80% and 65%, respectively, with no significant differences between the two arms. Nine patients in the Carbo d1 arm, but only one patient in the Carbo d8 arm, required a platelet transfusion. There were 10 partial responses (four Carbo d1 arm, six Carbo d8 arm), giving an overall response rate of 25% (95% CI 13–41%).Conclusion: Administration of carboplatin on day 8 of this regimen confers no clear advantage compared with day 1 carboplatin, with similar toxicity but lower dose intensity. A formula for the prediction of thrombocytopenia is proposed.
Title: Randomized phase II trial of gemcitabine and either day 1 or day 8 carboplatin for advanced non‐small‐cell lung cancer: Is thrombocytopenia predictable?
Description:
AbstractAim: Two 21‐day gemcitabine–carboplatin schedules were evaluated in patients with advanced non‐small cell lung cancer in order to assess the effect of timing of the carboplatin dose on toxicity and efficacy.
Methods: Patients were randomized to gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 of a 21‐day cycle) and carboplatin (AUC 5, on day 1) (Carbo d1 arm) or the same gemcitabine schedule with carboplatin given on day 8 (Carbo d8 arm).
Twenty patients with Stage IIIB or IV non‐small‐cell lung cancer were enrolled in each arm.
Results: The achieved dose intensities of both gemcitabine and carboplatin were significantly higher in the Carbo d1 arm.
The total rates of grade 3 or 4 hematological and non‐hematological toxicities (any toxicity, any cycle) were 80% and 65%, respectively, with no significant differences between the two arms.
Nine patients in the Carbo d1 arm, but only one patient in the Carbo d8 arm, required a platelet transfusion.
There were 10 partial responses (four Carbo d1 arm, six Carbo d8 arm), giving an overall response rate of 25% (95% CI 13–41%).
Conclusion: Administration of carboplatin on day 8 of this regimen confers no clear advantage compared with day 1 carboplatin, with similar toxicity but lower dose intensity.
A formula for the prediction of thrombocytopenia is proposed.
Related Results
Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM)
Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM)
This section provides current contact details and a summary of recent or ongoing clinical trials being coordinated by Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM). Clinical trials...
Microwave Ablation with or Without Chemotherapy in Management of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review
Microwave Ablation with or Without Chemotherapy in Management of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction
Microwave ablation (MWA) has emerged as a minimally invasive treatment for patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, whether it i...
International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG)
International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG)
This section provides current contact details and a summary of recent or ongoing clinical trials being coordinated by International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG). Clinical tria...
Abstract 1427: Investigating role of RECQ1 in response to gemcitabine treatment in triple negative breast cancer
Abstract 1427: Investigating role of RECQ1 in response to gemcitabine treatment in triple negative breast cancer
Abstract
The response of cancer cells to therapeutic drugs aimed at causing DNA damage is dependent on proteins that play roles in DNA repair. Single nucleotide poly...
Ameliorative Role of Grape Seed Extract (Vitis Vinifera) on Gemcitabine- Induced Testicular Damage in Rabbits
Ameliorative Role of Grape Seed Extract (Vitis Vinifera) on Gemcitabine- Induced Testicular Damage in Rabbits
Spermatogenesis is a highly conserved and regulated process and it is sensitive to fluctuations in the physical and chemical environment. Gemcitabine is a novel antimetabolic antic...
Abstract 1416: Synergistic cytotoxicity of metformin cotreatment with paclitaxel or carboplatin in triple negative breast cancer cell lines
Abstract 1416: Synergistic cytotoxicity of metformin cotreatment with paclitaxel or carboplatin in triple negative breast cancer cell lines
Abstract
Metformin is an oral antidiabetic drug with a putative antineoplastic effect in breast cancer; however, its efficacy in clinical trials has been mixed. Trip...
Abstract 1345: Evidence for genetic mediation of lung cancer through hay fever.
Abstract 1345: Evidence for genetic mediation of lung cancer through hay fever.
Abstract
Introduction: In the past decade, advances in genetics have led to the discovery of numerous lung cancer susceptibility variants. The majority of these vari...
Edoxaban and Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: A Meta-analysis of Clinical Trials
Edoxaban and Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: A Meta-analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract
Introduction
Cancer patients face a venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk that is up to 50 times higher compared to individuals without cancer. In 2010, direct oral anticoagul...

