Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Freight Railroads Adjacent to High-Speed Rail: Assessing the Risk

View through CrossRef
By law, the California High-Speed Train System (CHSTS) must be designed and built along established transportation corridors, includes adjacent to or in shared right-of-ways with Class 1 freight railroads. The Adjacent Railroad Hazard Risk Assessment Model (ARHRAM) has been developed as a tool to assist the California High-Speed Rail Authority (Authority) in the assessment of hazard risk posed by adjacent freight railroads. This assessment assists the Authority in the risk-based prioritization of resources meant to mitigate the hazards presented by the adjacency of freight railroad operations. Use of the ARHRAM allows the Authority to apply consistent, objective assessment techniques across the entire system and throughout the various developmental phases. ARHRAM uses both quantitative and qualitative techniques to develop a characterization of the hazard risk at a particular location, as opposed to an exact probability of the occurrence of a derailment. FRA-reportable derailment data is used to establish the frequency of a derailment on the adjacent railroad at any location, normalized against the performance over a 10-year period. A review of characteristics at a particular location is then conducted, examining for the presence of sixteen separate site characteristics including alignment geometry, train control methods, speed, access, grade crossings, special trackwork, and operational modes. Each characteristic is given a value according to its presence (or not) and the total multiplied by the derailment factor for the railroad and volume of trains operated at the location. The result is a characterization of the levels of site-specific hazard risk that allows the Authority to prioritize mitigations (resources) in order to reduce risk to an acceptable level. The model is dynamic in that it can be modified if new characteristics need to be introduced or existing characteristics modified, and the model can be re-run should physical or operational conditions change in the future. This paper applies the model to an existing rail corridor adjacent the CHSTS, demonstrating how appropriate mitigations can be determined and residual risk accepted. The paper also identifies future applications of the ARHRAM in the development of the CHSTS, and potential applications for other systems or modes.
American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Title: Freight Railroads Adjacent to High-Speed Rail: Assessing the Risk
Description:
By law, the California High-Speed Train System (CHSTS) must be designed and built along established transportation corridors, includes adjacent to or in shared right-of-ways with Class 1 freight railroads.
The Adjacent Railroad Hazard Risk Assessment Model (ARHRAM) has been developed as a tool to assist the California High-Speed Rail Authority (Authority) in the assessment of hazard risk posed by adjacent freight railroads.
This assessment assists the Authority in the risk-based prioritization of resources meant to mitigate the hazards presented by the adjacency of freight railroad operations.
Use of the ARHRAM allows the Authority to apply consistent, objective assessment techniques across the entire system and throughout the various developmental phases.
ARHRAM uses both quantitative and qualitative techniques to develop a characterization of the hazard risk at a particular location, as opposed to an exact probability of the occurrence of a derailment.
FRA-reportable derailment data is used to establish the frequency of a derailment on the adjacent railroad at any location, normalized against the performance over a 10-year period.
A review of characteristics at a particular location is then conducted, examining for the presence of sixteen separate site characteristics including alignment geometry, train control methods, speed, access, grade crossings, special trackwork, and operational modes.
Each characteristic is given a value according to its presence (or not) and the total multiplied by the derailment factor for the railroad and volume of trains operated at the location.
The result is a characterization of the levels of site-specific hazard risk that allows the Authority to prioritize mitigations (resources) in order to reduce risk to an acceptable level.
The model is dynamic in that it can be modified if new characteristics need to be introduced or existing characteristics modified, and the model can be re-run should physical or operational conditions change in the future.
This paper applies the model to an existing rail corridor adjacent the CHSTS, demonstrating how appropriate mitigations can be determined and residual risk accepted.
The paper also identifies future applications of the ARHRAM in the development of the CHSTS, and potential applications for other systems or modes.

Related Results

Competition Into Brazilian and North American Freight Rail Systems: A Comparative Regulatory Assessment
Competition Into Brazilian and North American Freight Rail Systems: A Comparative Regulatory Assessment
Competition is the driving force of any economic system, as it creates a challenging environment for service suppliers to provide affordable and reliable services to customers. Rai...
Design of Flangeway Gap for Restraining Rail
Design of Flangeway Gap for Restraining Rail
The aim of the paper is to classify restraining rail, discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each type of restraining rail, derive the formula to determine the flangeway gap, ...
Influence of Rail Cant on High Rail Side Wear on Sharp Curve of Urban Transit
Influence of Rail Cant on High Rail Side Wear on Sharp Curve of Urban Transit
The increasing of traffic and operation speed in urban transits has accelerated the degradation of track components. Rail wear, especially extended side wear of the high rail on sh...
San Pedro Bay Ports Rail Enhancement Program: 2010 Update
San Pedro Bay Ports Rail Enhancement Program: 2010 Update
The San Pedro Bay Ports of Long Beach and Los Angeles continue to provide vital rail connections to the rest of the country. The Rail Enhancement Program sets forth the rail improv...
Fatigue Analysis of Rail-Head-to-Web Fillet at Bolted Rail Joint Under Various Impact Wheel Load Factors and Support Configurations
Fatigue Analysis of Rail-Head-to-Web Fillet at Bolted Rail Joint Under Various Impact Wheel Load Factors and Support Configurations
As one of the weakest locations in the track superstructure, the rail joint encounters different types of defects and failures, including rail bolt-hole cracking, rail head-web cra...
Commuter Rail, Freight Railroads, and the Open Access Debate
Commuter Rail, Freight Railroads, and the Open Access Debate
The future of the U.S. commuter rail industry is inextricably linked to that of the freight railroads. Because of recent mergers and associated operating issues, some shipper inter...
Towards a Better Understanding of the Rail Grinding Mechanism
Towards a Better Understanding of the Rail Grinding Mechanism
Rail grinding continues to be one of the most effective techniques for extending rail life, improving wheel/rail contact behavior, and reducing the overall cost of track maintenanc...
State Rail Plans: The Integration of Freight and Passenger Rail Planning
State Rail Plans: The Integration of Freight and Passenger Rail Planning
The Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act of 2008 (PRIIA) was created to reauthorize the National Railroad Passenger Corporation, better known as Amtrak, and strengthen the...

Back to Top