Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Following The Niche: Reconstructing 32,000 Years Of Niche Dynamics In Four European Ungulate Species

View through CrossRef
Abstract An understanding of how ecological niches can change through time is key to predicting the effect of future global change. Past climatic fluctuations provide a natural experiment to assess the extent to which species can change their niche. Here we use an extensive archaeological database to formally test whether the niche of four European ungulates changed between 40 and 8 kya (i.e. before major anthropogenic habitat modification and excluding the confounding effect of domestication). We find that niche change depended on habitat. Horse and aurochs, which are adapted to open environment, changed their niche after the Last Glacial Maximum, and it is unclear whether this was the result of adaptation, or an expansion of the realized niche as a response to the extinction of other megafauna (competitors and predators) that shared the same habitat preferences. On the other hand, red deer and wild boar, which prefer close and semi-close habitats, did not change their niche during the same period; possibly because these habitats have experienced fewer extinctions. Irrespective of the mechanism that might have led to the observed niche changes, the fact that large mammals with long generation times can change their niche over the time period of thousands of years cautions against assuming a constant niche when predicting the future. Significance statement When predicting species responses to future change, it is often assumed that their habitat preferences (i.e. their niche) will not change. However, it is strongly debated whether this is reasonable. Here we show that two out of four species of large European ungulates changed their niche following the Last Glacial Maximum, possibly as a response to the reorganization of animal communities that resulted from numerous megafauna extinctions. This finding cautions against the assumption of a constant niche, highlighting that, to predict the future, we will ultimately need to understand the mechanisms that underpin the success of a given species under different climatic conditions.
Title: Following The Niche: Reconstructing 32,000 Years Of Niche Dynamics In Four European Ungulate Species
Description:
Abstract An understanding of how ecological niches can change through time is key to predicting the effect of future global change.
Past climatic fluctuations provide a natural experiment to assess the extent to which species can change their niche.
Here we use an extensive archaeological database to formally test whether the niche of four European ungulates changed between 40 and 8 kya (i.
e.
before major anthropogenic habitat modification and excluding the confounding effect of domestication).
We find that niche change depended on habitat.
Horse and aurochs, which are adapted to open environment, changed their niche after the Last Glacial Maximum, and it is unclear whether this was the result of adaptation, or an expansion of the realized niche as a response to the extinction of other megafauna (competitors and predators) that shared the same habitat preferences.
On the other hand, red deer and wild boar, which prefer close and semi-close habitats, did not change their niche during the same period; possibly because these habitats have experienced fewer extinctions.
Irrespective of the mechanism that might have led to the observed niche changes, the fact that large mammals with long generation times can change their niche over the time period of thousands of years cautions against assuming a constant niche when predicting the future.
Significance statement When predicting species responses to future change, it is often assumed that their habitat preferences (i.
e.
their niche) will not change.
However, it is strongly debated whether this is reasonable.
Here we show that two out of four species of large European ungulates changed their niche following the Last Glacial Maximum, possibly as a response to the reorganization of animal communities that resulted from numerous megafauna extinctions.
This finding cautions against the assumption of a constant niche, highlighting that, to predict the future, we will ultimately need to understand the mechanisms that underpin the success of a given species under different climatic conditions.

Related Results

Interspecific carnivore competition and ungulate predation correlate with predator species richness
Interspecific carnivore competition and ungulate predation correlate with predator species richness
Abstract Competition for resources underlies the development of ecological community structure and function. Niche compression occurs when sp...
Effect of wild ungulate density on invertebrates in a Mediterranean ecosystem
Effect of wild ungulate density on invertebrates in a Mediterranean ecosystem
In recent decades, the abundance and distribution of certain big game species, particularly red deer (Cervus elaphus) and wild boar (Sus scrofa), have increased in south central Sp...
Impacts of man-made structures on marine biodiversity and species status - native & non-native species
Impacts of man-made structures on marine biodiversity and species status - native & non-native species
<p>Coastal environments are exposed to anthropogenic activities such as frequent marine traffic and restructuring, i.e., addition, removal or replacing with man-made structur...
An assessment of the niche centroid hypothesis: Pteropus lylei (Chiroptera)
An assessment of the niche centroid hypothesis: Pteropus lylei (Chiroptera)
AbstractRecent ecological theories propose that species reach their highest abundance and genetic diversity in the center of their ecological niche and decline toward the edges. We...
Realized vs. potential dietary niche aggravates species loss to secondary extinctions
Realized vs. potential dietary niche aggravates species loss to secondary extinctions
1.Biodiversity loss is occurring at an unprecedented rate, but its consequences on ecosystem robustness remain difficult to predict. Both theoretical and empirical work have sugges...

Back to Top