Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Patients’ Perspective on Termination of Pacemaker Therapy—A Cross-Sectional Anonymous Survey among Patients Carrying a Pacemaker in Germany
View through CrossRef
Objective: To determine the opinions of patients regarding the withdrawal of pacemaker therapy. Participants and methods: A cross-sectional anonymous questionnaire was administered to patients visiting an outpatient cardiologic clinic for routine follow-up visits of pacemaker therapy or patients carrying a pacemaker admitted to a hospital between 2021 and 2022. Results: Three-hundred and forty patients answered the questionnaire. A total of 56% of the participants were male. The mean age was 81 years. The majority of respondents were very comfortable with their PM and felt well informed, with one exception: more than half of respondents were missing information on withdrawal of pacemaker therapy. Almost two-thirds wanted to decide for themselves if their pacemaker therapy was withdrawn regardless of whether they were ill or healthy. Almost 60% of patients would like the pacemaker to be turned off when dying. Women expressed this wish significantly more often than men. Conclusion: Our survey shows that patients prefer to be informed on issues regarding the withdrawal of pacemakers as early as preimplantation. Also, patients would like to be involved in decisions that have to be made at the end of life, including decisions on withdrawal. Offers of conversations about this important issue should include information on special features of the patient’s pacemaker, e.g., the absence or presence of pacemaker dependency. Knowledge about the pacemaker’s functionality may prevent distress among individuals nearing their end of life when, for example, under the false impression that timely deactivation may allow for a more peaceful death.
Title: Patients’ Perspective on Termination of Pacemaker Therapy—A Cross-Sectional Anonymous Survey among Patients Carrying a Pacemaker in Germany
Description:
Objective: To determine the opinions of patients regarding the withdrawal of pacemaker therapy.
Participants and methods: A cross-sectional anonymous questionnaire was administered to patients visiting an outpatient cardiologic clinic for routine follow-up visits of pacemaker therapy or patients carrying a pacemaker admitted to a hospital between 2021 and 2022.
Results: Three-hundred and forty patients answered the questionnaire.
A total of 56% of the participants were male.
The mean age was 81 years.
The majority of respondents were very comfortable with their PM and felt well informed, with one exception: more than half of respondents were missing information on withdrawal of pacemaker therapy.
Almost two-thirds wanted to decide for themselves if their pacemaker therapy was withdrawn regardless of whether they were ill or healthy.
Almost 60% of patients would like the pacemaker to be turned off when dying.
Women expressed this wish significantly more often than men.
Conclusion: Our survey shows that patients prefer to be informed on issues regarding the withdrawal of pacemakers as early as preimplantation.
Also, patients would like to be involved in decisions that have to be made at the end of life, including decisions on withdrawal.
Offers of conversations about this important issue should include information on special features of the patient’s pacemaker, e.
g.
, the absence or presence of pacemaker dependency.
Knowledge about the pacemaker’s functionality may prevent distress among individuals nearing their end of life when, for example, under the false impression that timely deactivation may allow for a more peaceful death.
Related Results
The moment of termination of corporate legal relations
The moment of termination of corporate legal relations
The long-term nature of corporate legal relations necessitates the theoretical selection of certain moments of their emergence, change and termination. The update of the corporate ...
Cardiologists' perspective on termination of pacemaker therapy–an anonymous survey among cardiologists in Germany
Cardiologists' perspective on termination of pacemaker therapy–an anonymous survey among cardiologists in Germany
Abstract
Background
The patient’s right to refuse pacemaker therapy is mentioned in the relevant European consensus statement but additional information...
Device–device interference triggered by an abandoned pacemaker: a case report
Device–device interference triggered by an abandoned pacemaker: a case report
Abstract
Background
Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) are prone to electromagnetic interference. Common sources inc...
Long-term implications of pacemaker insertion in younger adults: a single centre experience
Long-term implications of pacemaker insertion in younger adults: a single centre experience
Abstract
Background
The long-term implications of pacemaker insertion in younger adults are poorly described in the literature.
...
Study on the Ecological Carrying Capacity and Driving Factors of the Source Region of the Yellow River in China in the Past 30 Years
Study on the Ecological Carrying Capacity and Driving Factors of the Source Region of the Yellow River in China in the Past 30 Years
Abstract
Under the influence of natural factors and human activities, the ecological environment functions in the source region of the Yellow River in China have been degra...
Leadless Pacemaker tine fracture and dislocation: two case reports
Leadless Pacemaker tine fracture and dislocation: two case reports
Abstract
The rate of leadless pacemaker implantation is increasing worldwide. To date, there have been few reports of leadless pacemaker dislocation and extraction. This ar...
International Real Estate Review
International Real Estate Review
Reverse mortgages generally have open maturity dates. The variability of the exact termination time of a mortgage is one of the most important risks faced by the lenders and mortga...
P425Single procedure pace and ablate. evaluation of efficacy and safety comparing three different vascular routes
P425Single procedure pace and ablate. evaluation of efficacy and safety comparing three different vascular routes
Abstract
Funding Acknowledgements
No financial support for this study
Introduc...

