Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Cardiologists' perspective on termination of pacemaker therapy–an anonymous survey among cardiologists in Germany

View through CrossRef
Abstract Background The patient’s right to refuse pacemaker therapy is mentioned in the relevant European consensus statement but additional information is only available on deactivation of implantable cardioverter deactivator and not on other cardiac implantable electronic devices such as pacemakers. Therefore, we were interested in opinions, concerns and attitudes of cardiologists, who are the primary contact persons for such requests, since the number of patients asking for withdrawal of pacemaker therapy is likely to increase leaving cardiologists and healthcare professionals with a difficult medical but also ethical problem. Methods An anonymous questionnaire was sent to all German cardiology departments (N = 288). Results 48% of cardiology departments responded by sending back 247 completed questionnaires. Most participating cardiologists were experienced when considering the duration of their professional activity. Almost all of the respondents regularly perform check-ups of pacemakers. The majority of cardiologists answering our questionnaire were prepared to deactivate a pacemaker upon patients’ request, and have done so. In pacemaker dependency, however, the willingness to withdraw decreases, even if death is imminent, for fear of causing distressing symptoms, sense of being responsible for patients possible immediate death, or fear of legal consequences. Conclusions The survey could clearly show that uncertainties remain among cardiologists dealing with a patient's wish for withdrawal, especially in cases of pacemaker dependency. We suggest that official statements of cardiologic societies in Europe are issued to clarify ethical, legal and practical aspects of pacemaker withdrawal. Trial registration Registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00026168) on 30.08.2021. Graphical Abstract
Title: Cardiologists' perspective on termination of pacemaker therapy–an anonymous survey among cardiologists in Germany
Description:
Abstract Background The patient’s right to refuse pacemaker therapy is mentioned in the relevant European consensus statement but additional information is only available on deactivation of implantable cardioverter deactivator and not on other cardiac implantable electronic devices such as pacemakers.
Therefore, we were interested in opinions, concerns and attitudes of cardiologists, who are the primary contact persons for such requests, since the number of patients asking for withdrawal of pacemaker therapy is likely to increase leaving cardiologists and healthcare professionals with a difficult medical but also ethical problem.
Methods An anonymous questionnaire was sent to all German cardiology departments (N = 288).
Results 48% of cardiology departments responded by sending back 247 completed questionnaires.
Most participating cardiologists were experienced when considering the duration of their professional activity.
Almost all of the respondents regularly perform check-ups of pacemakers.
The majority of cardiologists answering our questionnaire were prepared to deactivate a pacemaker upon patients’ request, and have done so.
In pacemaker dependency, however, the willingness to withdraw decreases, even if death is imminent, for fear of causing distressing symptoms, sense of being responsible for patients possible immediate death, or fear of legal consequences.
Conclusions The survey could clearly show that uncertainties remain among cardiologists dealing with a patient's wish for withdrawal, especially in cases of pacemaker dependency.
We suggest that official statements of cardiologic societies in Europe are issued to clarify ethical, legal and practical aspects of pacemaker withdrawal.
Trial registration Registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00026168) on 30.
08.
2021.
Graphical Abstract.

Related Results

The moment of termination of corporate legal relations
The moment of termination of corporate legal relations
The long-term nature of corporate legal relations necessitates the theoretical selection of certain moments of their emergence, change and termination. The update of the corporate ...
Device–device interference triggered by an abandoned pacemaker: a case report
Device–device interference triggered by an abandoned pacemaker: a case report
Abstract Background Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) are prone to electromagnetic interference. Common sources inc...
Leadless Pacemaker tine fracture and dislocation: two case reports
Leadless Pacemaker tine fracture and dislocation: two case reports
Abstract The rate of leadless pacemaker implantation is increasing worldwide. To date, there have been few reports of leadless pacemaker dislocation and extraction. This ar...
Long-term implications of pacemaker insertion in younger adults: a single centre experience
Long-term implications of pacemaker insertion in younger adults: a single centre experience
Abstract Background The long-term implications of pacemaker insertion in younger adults are poorly described in the literature. ...
Aveir Leadless Pacemaker implantation in pediatric population: a case series
Aveir Leadless Pacemaker implantation in pediatric population: a case series
Abstract Background While the Medtronic Micra pacemaker provided a small device for leadless pacemaker implantation, the Aveir d...
Subacute Right Ventricle Perforation by Pacemaker Lead Presenting with Left Hemothorax and Shock
Subacute Right Ventricle Perforation by Pacemaker Lead Presenting with Left Hemothorax and Shock
Cardiac perforation by pacemaker is a rare but potentially fatal complication. Acute perforations occurring within twenty-four hours of insertion of pacemaker can lead to hemoperic...

Back to Top