Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

ROV: Improving Remotely Operated(ROV) Intervention Capabilities for Blowout Preventer Override Systems

View through CrossRef
Abstract Events during 2010 have focused attention on increased ROV/BOP Intervention capabilities and standardization of BOP/ROV interfaces in the oil and gas offshore industry. Currently no enforced set standards for ROV intervention panels or manifold types for use on BOP Override systems are specified. The industry offers multiple configurations at present. This abstract will discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the various configurations in existence, trending toward suggested industry standards taking shape as requirements in the near term. Standards for the offshore industry or a set specification must be made to increase safety and functionality of BOP control systems. To date, ROV override capabilities have been added to existing engineered BOP systems. BOP designed closing times were not a critical consideration, only that the access was there to allow for ROV override. Increased ROV flow and pressure capabilities: no current minimum flow requirements for Emergency BOP Override pumps are established. Based on stack valving and configuration, a minimum, 7 gpm may be required to shift valving fully to allow BOP operator function. IADC/API minimum requirements may be proposed at 10 gpm at 3000psi. Based on shear pressures exceeding 3000psi, pressures of 5000psi should be considered. Current intervention skids/pump capabilities will be required if ROVs must achieve API 16D BOP minimum closing times. Remote or isolated accumulation for increased intervention capabilities offers possibilities when ANY ROV of opportunity can trigger a function (such as small inspection type ROVs). Increased volumes will be required. This is critical in functioning stack rams with an ROV of opportunity to achieve API 16D closing times. We now understand that higher flows and pressures are required along with standardization of stab types. Current recommendations: API 17H Hi-Flow manifolds should be added to essential ROV overrides. ROV skids will have a minimum requirement of 10gpm at 3000psi, but should have capabilities to achieve 5000psi and carry enough fluid volume to perform subsea BOP ram function. Also, any additional isolated accumulator volume would be tied to ANY ROV of opportunity to override the BOP in an emergency situation. Introduction As a result of events in early 2010, a need for increased ROV/BOP Intervention capabilities and standardization of ROV/BOP interfaces in the oil and gas offshore industry was highlighted. Based on BOP manufacture or Drilling contractor, ROV intervention points (hotstabs/manifolds) and flow requirements can differ greatly. ROV intervention points to this date consist of API 17D, API 17H or a custom variant of the two standards for ROV fluid intervention methods. For example, a BOP may have API 17D dual ports manifolds installed with each port operating a separate BOP function, or it may have both ports tied together feeding one function. That same manifold could also be plumbed to only one A or B port leaving the opposite port left open to sea or in the odd case, be bored through proving an increased flow path at the manifold. The same can be said for the API 17H configuration as well, each yielding multiple possibilities for the intervening ROV system to be configured incorrectly. (See Image 1)
Title: ROV: Improving Remotely Operated(ROV) Intervention Capabilities for Blowout Preventer Override Systems
Description:
Abstract Events during 2010 have focused attention on increased ROV/BOP Intervention capabilities and standardization of BOP/ROV interfaces in the oil and gas offshore industry.
Currently no enforced set standards for ROV intervention panels or manifold types for use on BOP Override systems are specified.
The industry offers multiple configurations at present.
This abstract will discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the various configurations in existence, trending toward suggested industry standards taking shape as requirements in the near term.
Standards for the offshore industry or a set specification must be made to increase safety and functionality of BOP control systems.
To date, ROV override capabilities have been added to existing engineered BOP systems.
BOP designed closing times were not a critical consideration, only that the access was there to allow for ROV override.
Increased ROV flow and pressure capabilities: no current minimum flow requirements for Emergency BOP Override pumps are established.
Based on stack valving and configuration, a minimum, 7 gpm may be required to shift valving fully to allow BOP operator function.
IADC/API minimum requirements may be proposed at 10 gpm at 3000psi.
Based on shear pressures exceeding 3000psi, pressures of 5000psi should be considered.
Current intervention skids/pump capabilities will be required if ROVs must achieve API 16D BOP minimum closing times.
Remote or isolated accumulation for increased intervention capabilities offers possibilities when ANY ROV of opportunity can trigger a function (such as small inspection type ROVs).
Increased volumes will be required.
This is critical in functioning stack rams with an ROV of opportunity to achieve API 16D closing times.
We now understand that higher flows and pressures are required along with standardization of stab types.
Current recommendations: API 17H Hi-Flow manifolds should be added to essential ROV overrides.
ROV skids will have a minimum requirement of 10gpm at 3000psi, but should have capabilities to achieve 5000psi and carry enough fluid volume to perform subsea BOP ram function.
Also, any additional isolated accumulator volume would be tied to ANY ROV of opportunity to override the BOP in an emergency situation.
Introduction As a result of events in early 2010, a need for increased ROV/BOP Intervention capabilities and standardization of ROV/BOP interfaces in the oil and gas offshore industry was highlighted.
Based on BOP manufacture or Drilling contractor, ROV intervention points (hotstabs/manifolds) and flow requirements can differ greatly.
ROV intervention points to this date consist of API 17D, API 17H or a custom variant of the two standards for ROV fluid intervention methods.
For example, a BOP may have API 17D dual ports manifolds installed with each port operating a separate BOP function, or it may have both ports tied together feeding one function.
That same manifold could also be plumbed to only one A or B port leaving the opposite port left open to sea or in the odd case, be bored through proving an increased flow path at the manifold.
The same can be said for the API 17H configuration as well, each yielding multiple possibilities for the intervening ROV system to be configured incorrectly.
(See Image 1).

Related Results

Underground Blowouts In Deep Well Drilling
Underground Blowouts In Deep Well Drilling
ABSTRACT A kick occurs when the wellbore pressure becomes less than the formation pressure, and formation fluid enters the wellbore. When the flow of formation fl...
Contingency Planning For Offshore Blowouts
Contingency Planning For Offshore Blowouts
ABSTRACT This paper describes requirements for blowout contingency planning with emphasis on planning for offshore blowouts. The contents are also generally appli...
Analysis of Surface and Wellbore Hydraulics Provides Key to Efficient Blowout Control
Analysis of Surface and Wellbore Hydraulics Provides Key to Efficient Blowout Control
Abstract Assessment of the blowout rate and composition is a key issue for decisions on the blowout control method, design of the kill operations, determination o...
Underground Blowout Control in Iranian Offshore Oil Field
Underground Blowout Control in Iranian Offshore Oil Field
Abstract An underground blowout occurs when formation fluids flow from one subsurface zone to another in an uncontrolled manner. The results range from being indi...
Experimental Wave Flume Tests in ROV-Wave Interaction Effects on the Line Tension for a Work Class ROV in Splash Zone
Experimental Wave Flume Tests in ROV-Wave Interaction Effects on the Line Tension for a Work Class ROV in Splash Zone
Abstract Integrity and stability of Remotely Operated Vehicle (ROV) when passing through the splash zone is one of the main concerns in the design of an ROV-umbilica...
Validation of Blowout Rate Calculations for Subsea Wells
Validation of Blowout Rate Calculations for Subsea Wells
Abstract Calculating the blowout rate of oil and gas wells is commonly one of the first steps in environmental impact assessment, contingency planning and emergency ...
DEVELOPMENT OF A RAM-TYPE BLOWOUT PREVENTER USED FOR SEALING THE WELLHEAD
DEVELOPMENT OF A RAM-TYPE BLOWOUT PREVENTER USED FOR SEALING THE WELLHEAD
Operational safety during drilling and workover of oil and gas wells largely depends on the reliability of blowout prevention equipment. Ram-type blowout preventers play a key role...

Back to Top