Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Surrogate markers in assessment of bisphosphonate effectiveness in osteoporosis treatment (bone mineral density, bone turnover markers)

View through CrossRef
A review of the literature which summarizes our knowledge on the use of surrogate markers of the osteoporosis treatment effectiveness when on bisphosphonate (BP) therapy. Bone mineral density (BMD) and markers of bone turnover, which have been shown to be associated with the clinical fracture end point, have been used as surrogate criteria for the effectiveness of treatment of osteoporosis in randomized controlled trials. When prescribing BP for the treatment of osteoporosis, BMD measurement every 12 months by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the well-described surrogate marker of BP efficacy. At the same time, stabilization of BMD is also a criterion for the treatment effectiveness since changes in BMD determined only 16% of the anti-fracture effectiveness of BP. Markers of bone remodeling can be used as surrogate markers after 3 (bone resorption) or 6 (bone formation) months from the start of BP therapy. A decrease of 30% or more is considered to be prognostically effective for both antifracture and BMD gain. There is a direct relationship between the degree of bone remodeling markers decrease and the antifracture effectiveness of BP therapy. The decrease in markers persists throughout the entire period of therapy and, accordingly, they can be used as surrogate markers of effectiveness and adherence to BP therapy throughout the entire treatment period. However, the presence of pathological fractures is a key clinical manifestation of osteoporosis and should be considered first in every decision making compared to any surrogate marker.Thus, when prescribing BP treatment, surrogate markers of changes in BMD and/or markers of bone remodeling can be used to monitor the effectiveness of treatment throughout the entire period of treatment and patients’ monitoring.
Title: Surrogate markers in assessment of bisphosphonate effectiveness in osteoporosis treatment (bone mineral density, bone turnover markers)
Description:
A review of the literature which summarizes our knowledge on the use of surrogate markers of the osteoporosis treatment effectiveness when on bisphosphonate (BP) therapy.
Bone mineral density (BMD) and markers of bone turnover, which have been shown to be associated with the clinical fracture end point, have been used as surrogate criteria for the effectiveness of treatment of osteoporosis in randomized controlled trials.
When prescribing BP for the treatment of osteoporosis, BMD measurement every 12 months by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the well-described surrogate marker of BP efficacy.
At the same time, stabilization of BMD is also a criterion for the treatment effectiveness since changes in BMD determined only 16% of the anti-fracture effectiveness of BP.
Markers of bone remodeling can be used as surrogate markers after 3 (bone resorption) or 6 (bone formation) months from the start of BP therapy.
A decrease of 30% or more is considered to be prognostically effective for both antifracture and BMD gain.
There is a direct relationship between the degree of bone remodeling markers decrease and the antifracture effectiveness of BP therapy.
The decrease in markers persists throughout the entire period of therapy and, accordingly, they can be used as surrogate markers of effectiveness and adherence to BP therapy throughout the entire treatment period.
However, the presence of pathological fractures is a key clinical manifestation of osteoporosis and should be considered first in every decision making compared to any surrogate marker.
Thus, when prescribing BP treatment, surrogate markers of changes in BMD and/or markers of bone remodeling can be used to monitor the effectiveness of treatment throughout the entire period of treatment and patients’ monitoring.

Related Results

Frequency of Common Chromosomal Abnormalities in Patients with Idiopathic Acquired Aplastic Anemia
Frequency of Common Chromosomal Abnormalities in Patients with Idiopathic Acquired Aplastic Anemia
Objective: To determine the frequency of common chromosomal aberrations in local population idiopathic determine the frequency of common chromosomal aberrations in local population...
P05 Osteoporosis in thalassemia; a case with multifactorial aetiology
P05 Osteoporosis in thalassemia; a case with multifactorial aetiology
Abstract Introduction Thalassemia patients are prone to osteoporosis due to multifactorial reasons, including anaemia, bone marr...
Underweight Sebagai Faktor Resiko Osteoporosis Pada Lansia
Underweight Sebagai Faktor Resiko Osteoporosis Pada Lansia
Osteoporosis is a bone disease characterized by decreased bone density. The incidence of osteoporosis increases with age, especially age ≥ 50 years. Research from the International...
PERPUTARAN KAS PERPUTARAN PERSEDIAAN DAN PERPUTARAN MODAL KERJA PADA GOFFE SAMARINDA
PERPUTARAN KAS PERPUTARAN PERSEDIAAN DAN PERPUTARAN MODAL KERJA PADA GOFFE SAMARINDA
Working capital turnover is very important for coffee shop because it affects a business's ability to survive and develop. Working capital is funds used to meet daily operational n...
Manfaat Ekstrak Dandelion Dalam Mencegah Osteoporosis
Manfaat Ekstrak Dandelion Dalam Mencegah Osteoporosis
Osteoporosis adalah penyakit tulang sistemik yang ditandai oleh penurunan densitas massa tulang sehingga tulang menjadi rapuh dan mudah patah. Karakteristik osteoporosis adalah dit...
Impact of degenerative radiographic abnormalities and vertebral fractures on spinal bone density of women with osteoporosis
Impact of degenerative radiographic abnormalities and vertebral fractures on spinal bone density of women with osteoporosis
CONTEXT: Measurements of bone density taken by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry are the most accurate procedure for the diagnosis of osteoporosis. This procedure has the disadvanta...

Back to Top