Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Artificial intelligence: Ignore or regulate?

View through CrossRef
The technological revolutionary achievements of the modern world inevitably pose a number of issues to humanity that require legal reflection. The most breakthrough achievements of the last few years are artificial intelligence systems. These systems are very successfully integrated into many spheres of life of the world community. To date, many countries have no systematic legal norms regulating the scope of artificial intelligence. The aim of this work is to formulate specific proposals for the legislative regulation of the field of artificial intelligence. To reach this aim, the authors analyzed legislative acts and law enforcement practice in the Russian Federation and in other modern technologically developed countries. Special attention was paid to determining the possibility of considering artificial intelligence as a subject of law. As part of the work, the authors also examined the doctrinal points of view of both the domestic and foreign scientific community. Based on the results of a comprehensive study, the authors propose to consider the possibility of attributing limited legal personality to some artificial intelligence systems: not all artificial intelligence systems should be given certain rights and responsibilities, but only those that have signs of strong artificial intelligence. In this regard, the authors propose to classify all artificial intelligence systems depending on how significant legal facts and legal consequences they are able to generate. It is advisable to structure the list of “advanced” artificial intelligence systems into one group – “strong intelligent systems”. The list of less developed artificial intelligence systems should be included in another group – “weak intelligent systems”. It is advisable classify artificial intelligence systems not on the principle of a generalized enumeration of their functionality, but on the principle of their specific literal enumeration. A specific list of “strong intelligent systems” will be formed and approved by the Government of the Russian Federation. Further, in connection with the proposed classification, comes the idea of attributing legal personality to “strong intelligent systems”. By analogy with the institution of legal entities, it is possible to provide a procedure for delegating certain rights and obligations to strong artificial intelligence, thereby bringing out a new subject in certain legal relations. Thus, the results of the study can outline certain boundaries of the work of artificial intelligence, contributing to the creation of specific constituent documents or protocols of functioning.
Title: Artificial intelligence: Ignore or regulate?
Description:
The technological revolutionary achievements of the modern world inevitably pose a number of issues to humanity that require legal reflection.
The most breakthrough achievements of the last few years are artificial intelligence systems.
These systems are very successfully integrated into many spheres of life of the world community.
To date, many countries have no systematic legal norms regulating the scope of artificial intelligence.
The aim of this work is to formulate specific proposals for the legislative regulation of the field of artificial intelligence.
To reach this aim, the authors analyzed legislative acts and law enforcement practice in the Russian Federation and in other modern technologically developed countries.
Special attention was paid to determining the possibility of considering artificial intelligence as a subject of law.
As part of the work, the authors also examined the doctrinal points of view of both the domestic and foreign scientific community.
Based on the results of a comprehensive study, the authors propose to consider the possibility of attributing limited legal personality to some artificial intelligence systems: not all artificial intelligence systems should be given certain rights and responsibilities, but only those that have signs of strong artificial intelligence.
In this regard, the authors propose to classify all artificial intelligence systems depending on how significant legal facts and legal consequences they are able to generate.
It is advisable to structure the list of “advanced” artificial intelligence systems into one group – “strong intelligent systems”.
The list of less developed artificial intelligence systems should be included in another group – “weak intelligent systems”.
It is advisable classify artificial intelligence systems not on the principle of a generalized enumeration of their functionality, but on the principle of their specific literal enumeration.
A specific list of “strong intelligent systems” will be formed and approved by the Government of the Russian Federation.
Further, in connection with the proposed classification, comes the idea of attributing legal personality to “strong intelligent systems”.
By analogy with the institution of legal entities, it is possible to provide a procedure for delegating certain rights and obligations to strong artificial intelligence, thereby bringing out a new subject in certain legal relations.
Thus, the results of the study can outline certain boundaries of the work of artificial intelligence, contributing to the creation of specific constituent documents or protocols of functioning.

Related Results

La luz: de herramienta a lenguaje. Una nueva metodología de iluminación artificial en el proyecto arquitectónico.
La luz: de herramienta a lenguaje. Una nueva metodología de iluminación artificial en el proyecto arquitectónico.
The constant development of artificial lighting throughout the twentieth century helped to develop architecture to the current situation in which a new methodology is needed for ...
Attitudes toward and readiness for medical artificial intelligence among medical and health science students
Attitudes toward and readiness for medical artificial intelligence among medical and health science students
Purpose: This study assessed general attitudes toward artificial intelligence and medical artificial intelligence readiness among medical and health sciences students and examined ...
Artificial intelligence in justice: legal and psychological aspects of law enforcement
Artificial intelligence in justice: legal and psychological aspects of law enforcement
The subject. Artificial intelligence is considered as an interdisciplinary legal and psychological phenomenon. The special need to strengthen the psychological component in legal r...
Information Security in Artificial Intelligence: A Study of the possible intersection
Information Security in Artificial Intelligence: A Study of the possible intersection
1. IntroductionArtificial Intelligence or A.I attempts to understand intelligent entities, and strives to build ones. And it is obvious that computers with human-level intelligence...
Ethical Artificial Intelligence and Bias Mitigation
Ethical Artificial Intelligence and Bias Mitigation
Artificial Intelligence has become an integral part of our lives, revolutionizing various industries and enhancing efficiency. However, as AI continues to advance, it is crucial to...
METHODOLOGICAL PRINCIPLES OF IMPLEMENTING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE INTO ORGANIZATIONAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
METHODOLOGICAL PRINCIPLES OF IMPLEMENTING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE INTO ORGANIZATIONAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
The article examines the theoretical and methodological principles of integrating artificial intelligence into an organization’s management system. It presents a cumulative model i...
THE IMPACT OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ON THE CHOICE OF MEASURES FOR ANTI-CRISIS MANAGEMENT AT UKRAINIAN ENTERPRISES
THE IMPACT OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ON THE CHOICE OF MEASURES FOR ANTI-CRISIS MANAGEMENT AT UKRAINIAN ENTERPRISES
The instability of the business environment in Ukraine, intensified by military risks, fluctuations in global markets, and internal structural challenges, increases the likelihood ...

Back to Top