Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Shielding Parenteral Nutrition From Light: Does the Available Evidence Support a Randomized, Controlled Trial?
View through CrossRef
BACKGROUND. Exposure of total parenteral nutrition to ambient light induces the generation of peroxides, creating oxidant stress, which potentially compounds complications of prematurity. Photograph protection of total parenteral nutrition reduces the peroxide load and has been shown to be associated with nutritional and biochemical benefits in animals and humans. It is unclear whether this reduction in peroxides from total parenteral nutrition leads to a reduction in the complications of prematurity, such as bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Our hypothesis was that shielding total parenteral nutrition from ambient light is linked to clinical benefits.OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this work was to determine whether photograph protection of total parenteral nutrition (light protected), as compared with no photoprotection (light exposed), reduces the occurrence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia or death in preterm infants.METHODS. The Canadian Neonatal Network provided data for infants born in 2006 at <28 weeks' gestation admitted to level 3 NICUs in Canada. A retrospective analysis was performed comparing bronchopulmonary dysplasia and death in infants who received light-exposed or light-protected parenteral nutrition. Data were analyzed by using logistic regression models.RESULTS. Thirteen NICUs offered partial light-protected (total parenteral nutrition bag only, intravenous tubing exposed) and 13 offered light-exposed parenteral nutrition; not a single NICU offered complete light-protected parenteral nutrition (total parenteral nutrition bag plus intravenous tubing). The incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia or death was 66% with light-protected (n = 428) vs 59% with light-exposed (n = 438) parenteral nutrition.CONCLUSIONS. Partial photograph protection of total parenteral nutrition was not associated with a reduction in bronchopulmonary dysplasia or death as compared with no photograph protection; this relationship is confounded by covariates with strong associations with bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Partial photograph protection of total parenteral nutrition solutions confers no clinical benefit, while consuming valuable resources. A randomized, controlled trial is justified to determine whether there is a true “cause-and-effect” relationship between complete photoprotection of total parenteral nutrition and bronchopulmonary dysplasia or death.
Title: Shielding Parenteral Nutrition From Light: Does the Available Evidence Support a Randomized, Controlled Trial?
Description:
BACKGROUND.
Exposure of total parenteral nutrition to ambient light induces the generation of peroxides, creating oxidant stress, which potentially compounds complications of prematurity.
Photograph protection of total parenteral nutrition reduces the peroxide load and has been shown to be associated with nutritional and biochemical benefits in animals and humans.
It is unclear whether this reduction in peroxides from total parenteral nutrition leads to a reduction in the complications of prematurity, such as bronchopulmonary dysplasia.
Our hypothesis was that shielding total parenteral nutrition from ambient light is linked to clinical benefits.
OBJECTIVE.
The purpose of this work was to determine whether photograph protection of total parenteral nutrition (light protected), as compared with no photoprotection (light exposed), reduces the occurrence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia or death in preterm infants.
METHODS.
The Canadian Neonatal Network provided data for infants born in 2006 at <28 weeks' gestation admitted to level 3 NICUs in Canada.
A retrospective analysis was performed comparing bronchopulmonary dysplasia and death in infants who received light-exposed or light-protected parenteral nutrition.
Data were analyzed by using logistic regression models.
RESULTS.
Thirteen NICUs offered partial light-protected (total parenteral nutrition bag only, intravenous tubing exposed) and 13 offered light-exposed parenteral nutrition; not a single NICU offered complete light-protected parenteral nutrition (total parenteral nutrition bag plus intravenous tubing).
The incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia or death was 66% with light-protected (n = 428) vs 59% with light-exposed (n = 438) parenteral nutrition.
CONCLUSIONS.
Partial photograph protection of total parenteral nutrition was not associated with a reduction in bronchopulmonary dysplasia or death as compared with no photograph protection; this relationship is confounded by covariates with strong associations with bronchopulmonary dysplasia.
Partial photograph protection of total parenteral nutrition solutions confers no clinical benefit, while consuming valuable resources.
A randomized, controlled trial is justified to determine whether there is a true “cause-and-effect” relationship between complete photoprotection of total parenteral nutrition and bronchopulmonary dysplasia or death.
Related Results
Linking White‐Tailed Deer Density, Nutrition, and Vegetation in a Stochastic Environment
Linking White‐Tailed Deer Density, Nutrition, and Vegetation in a Stochastic Environment
ABSTRACT
Density‐dependent behavior underpins white‐tailed deer (
Odocoileus virginianus
) theory and...
Grains or Veins: Is Enteral Nutrition Really Better Than Parenteral Nutrition? A Look at the Evidence
Grains or Veins: Is Enteral Nutrition Really Better Than Parenteral Nutrition? A Look at the Evidence
Background: Enteral nutrition is said to be better than parenteral nutrition for providing nutrition support to humans. Purpose: To assess the literature documenting the assertions...
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract
The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical a...
Parenteral nutrition in the critically ill
Parenteral nutrition in the critically ill
Purpose of review
Feeding guidelines have recommended early, full nutritional support in critically ill patients to prevent hypercatabolism and muscle weakness. Early e...
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
This review summarizes the evidence from six randomized controlled trials that judged the effectiveness of systematic review summaries on policymakers' decision making, or the most...
Parenteral Nutrition‐Associated Metabolic Bone Disease
Parenteral Nutrition‐Associated Metabolic Bone Disease
The incidence of parenteral nutrition‐associated metabolic bone disease is unknown. Initial reports from the early 1980s suggested that both osteoporosis and osteomalacia were quit...
Enteral and Parenteral Nutrition
Enteral and Parenteral Nutrition
Alternative routes of nutrient administration are available for patients who are unable to eat or digest sufficient food to prevent malnutrition. These routes include enteral (admi...
International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG)
International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG)
This section provides current contact details and a summary of recent or ongoing clinical trials being coordinated by International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG). Clinical tria...

