Giving up knowledge is almost never a good idea: an interview with Dr Evan Zahn

The history of congenital interventional cardiology has seen numerous groundbreaking innovations typically related to the introduction of a new device or a novel treatment technique. Similarly, imaging of cardiac defects has changed dramatically over the past decades, although some of the advancements have seemed to omit the catheterisation laboratories. Rotational angiography, one of the imaging techniques for guidance of cardiac catheterisation currently referred to as “advanced”, in fact was described already in 1960s.1 More recently its improved version, including three-dimensional reconstruction (3DRA), became a valuable intra-procedural imaging tool in interventional cardiology and neuroradiology.2 Dr Evan Zahn was one of the pioneers of 3DRA in the field of congenital cardiology, setting an example for many to follow. With his innovative publication and subsequent lecture at 2011 Pediatric and Adult Interventional Cardiac Symposium (PICS-AICS) on “The Emerging Use of 3-Dimensional Rotational Angiography in Congenital Heart Disease” he motivated many to explore benefits of this modality to strive for improved procedural outcomes and reduced patients’ burden of cardiac catheterisation3. I was one of those to take Dr Zahn’s thoughts and implement them into routine workflow.4–6 However, almost a decade after Dr Zahn shared his important work, despite tremendous efforts by teams from Utrecht, (Netherlands) and Columbus (Ohio, United States of America) to popularise 3D imaging in catheterisation laboratory during dedicated meetings, two-dimensional (2D) angiography does not seem to be threatened in many, otherwise-progressive, laboratories. During the recent 30th Japanese Pediatric Interventional Cardiology (JPIC) meeting I had the opportunity to ask Dr Zahn why giving up knowledge is almost never a good idea, what is technology’s natural order of things, and why the technology has to be more than just exciting, pretty, and new.