Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Suur-Soome varjus. Hinnangutest Ilmari Mannineni teadustööle
View through CrossRef
The objective of this article is to examine Ilmari Manninen’s position within Finnish ethnology on the basis of archival sources. The material consists mainly of Manninen’s correspondence, and the methodological approach is a close re-reading of his scholarly work. Manninen spent six years in Estonia, where he adapted well to the university and museum life in Tartu. The opening of the Estonian National Museum was a milestone and a testament to the success of the working team. Manninen’s return to Finnish ethnology was not self-evident. Although he maintained contact with Finland through A. M. Tallgren and Kaarle Krohn, he was regarded as an outsider by the Finnish National Museum and the University of Helsinki. By applying the historical research concept of the community of experience, this article situates Manninen within the field of Finnish ethnography. Manninen’s life’s work was evaluated in the context of his application for a professorship. His work in Estonia and his contribution as Head of the Ethnographic Department at the National Museum of Finland seem to have been acknowledged. However, his scholarly research on Estonian folk culture does not appear to have received the same level of recognition. Manninen’s research focused on Estonia and Karelia. Albert Hämäläinen’s research, on the other hand, concentrated on Western and Central Finland. This raises the question of whether it may have been a matter of a confrontation between East and West.
Title: Suur-Soome varjus. Hinnangutest Ilmari Mannineni teadustööle
Description:
The objective of this article is to examine Ilmari Manninen’s position within Finnish ethnology on the basis of archival sources.
The material consists mainly of Manninen’s correspondence, and the methodological approach is a close re-reading of his scholarly work.
Manninen spent six years in Estonia, where he adapted well to the university and museum life in Tartu.
The opening of the Estonian National Museum was a milestone and a testament to the success of the working team.
Manninen’s return to Finnish ethnology was not self-evident.
Although he maintained contact with Finland through A.
M.
Tallgren and Kaarle Krohn, he was regarded as an outsider by the Finnish National Museum and the University of Helsinki.
By applying the historical research concept of the community of experience, this article situates Manninen within the field of Finnish ethnography.
Manninen’s life’s work was evaluated in the context of his application for a professorship.
His work in Estonia and his contribution as Head of the Ethnographic Department at the National Museum of Finland seem to have been acknowledged.
However, his scholarly research on Estonian folk culture does not appear to have received the same level of recognition.
Manninen’s research focused on Estonia and Karelia.
Albert Hämäläinen’s research, on the other hand, concentrated on Western and Central Finland.
This raises the question of whether it may have been a matter of a confrontation between East and West.
Related Results
Aarne Michaël Tallgren, Estonia, and Tartu in 1920: The image of a country in correspondence [Abstract: Kokkuvõte: Aarne Michaël Tallgren, Eesti ja Tartu aastal 1920: riigi kuvand kirjavahetuses]
Aarne Michaël Tallgren, Estonia, and Tartu in 1920: The image of a country in correspondence [Abstract: Kokkuvõte: Aarne Michaël Tallgren, Eesti ja Tartu aastal 1920: riigi kuvand kirjavahetuses]
Kokkuvõte: Aarne Michaël Tallgren, Eesti ja Tartu aastal 1920: riigi kuvand kirjavahetuses
Rahvusvaheliselt tuntud Soome arheoloog Aarne Michaël Tallgren (1885–1945) määrati ...
Rif1 inhibits replication fork progression and controls DNA copy number in Drosophila
Rif1 inhibits replication fork progression and controls DNA copy number in Drosophila
Control of DNA copy number is essential to maintain genome stability and ensure proper cell and tissue function. In Drosophila polyploid cells, the SNF2-domain-containing SUUR prot...
Rif1 inhibits replication fork progression and controls DNA copy number in Drosophila
Rif1 inhibits replication fork progression and controls DNA copy number in Drosophila
ABSTRACT
Control of DNA copy number is essential to maintain genome stability and ensure proper cell and tissue function. In Drosophila polyploid cells, the SNF2-do...
Virolais–suomalainen kielitieteen sanasto
Virolais–suomalainen kielitieteen sanasto
Saatteeksi
Virolais-suomalainen kielitieteen sanasto on tarkoitettu yliopiston viron kielen opiskelijoille ja vironkielisen kielitieteellisen kirjallisuuden suomalaiselle lukija...
Modaalkonstruktsioonid eesti ja soome palvetes
Modaalkonstruktsioonid eesti ja soome palvetes
Kokkuvõte. Siinses artiklis vaatleme modaalverbide ja neile funktsionaalselt lähedaste väljendite kasutust eesti ja soome palvetes ja küsimustes. Mõlemas keeles on palju sarnase al...
The Finnish exclusive-negative construction ei…ku(i)n in the network of exclusion expressions
The Finnish exclusive-negative construction ei…ku(i)n in the network of exclusion expressions
Abstract. This paper shows that Finnish has the option of expressing ‘only’-like exclusive meaning with a clausal construction, here called the Exclusive-Negative Construction, ENC...
Dynamics of Crossing Borders. The Case of Hella Wuolijoki / Piiride ületamise dünaamika. Hella Wuolijoki juhtum
Dynamics of Crossing Borders. The Case of Hella Wuolijoki / Piiride ületamise dünaamika. Hella Wuolijoki juhtum
The focus of the article is Estonian born Finnish playwright Hella Wuolijoki (1886–1954). The article concentrates on the process of becoming 1) the de-familiarized Own and subsequ...
Tytöntyllerö ja pojanjolppi Suomessa ja Virossa
Tytöntyllerö ja pojanjolppi Suomessa ja Virossa
Artikkel käsitleb deskriptiivset (koloratiivset) nominaaltarindit eesti ja soome keeles, mille süntaktiline sõltuvussuhe on normaalsega vastupidine: atributiivne genitiiv väljendab...

