Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Decision making processes of higher education governing boards
View through CrossRef
Governing boards of organizations have come under scrutiny in recent decades for financial problems, leadership scandals, and a variety of other uncomfortable reasons. Trustees might have prevented challenges and scandals if the appropriate board oversight were in place including the right board structures, practices, culture, governance, and communication processes. Colleges, and university boards in particular, operate in a unique space given their organizations' mission to educate the next generation of students, conduct groundbreaking research that promotes the development of new knowledge, and engage in civic activities among other endeavors. These organizations are held in high esteem because of the importance of their mission, despite reported poor decisions and scandals within the industry. Governing boards vary greatly in size, structure, culture, and effectiveness of operation. Their members make decisions about the direction of the institution, including changes in leadership, mission, purpose, or strategy. However, these decisions remain a mystery to most scholars and, certainly, to the general public who are the consumers of their educational services. With global disruption due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the role of governing boards and their decision-making has become even more critical to institutions' long-term sustainability. This study utilized a qualitative multiple case study approach to examine how two different types of higher education governing boards (private and public) determine when to make decisions about significant changes within the organization. To develop an understanding of the operations of a governing board in relation to the change process and leadership change, in-depth interviews were conducted with governing board members from two different higher education institutions in the northeastern United States. The communication practices between the governing board and the president in particular were explored as a component of the decision-making process, in light of shifts in the educational landscape due to the pandemic. Through an analysis of governing boards' decision-making process, as well as their structure, culture, governance practices, performance, and relationship to the president of the organization, this study has identified factors that contribute to governing boards' decisions to make significant change.
Title: Decision making processes of higher education governing boards
Description:
Governing boards of organizations have come under scrutiny in recent decades for financial problems, leadership scandals, and a variety of other uncomfortable reasons.
Trustees might have prevented challenges and scandals if the appropriate board oversight were in place including the right board structures, practices, culture, governance, and communication processes.
Colleges, and university boards in particular, operate in a unique space given their organizations' mission to educate the next generation of students, conduct groundbreaking research that promotes the development of new knowledge, and engage in civic activities among other endeavors.
These organizations are held in high esteem because of the importance of their mission, despite reported poor decisions and scandals within the industry.
Governing boards vary greatly in size, structure, culture, and effectiveness of operation.
Their members make decisions about the direction of the institution, including changes in leadership, mission, purpose, or strategy.
However, these decisions remain a mystery to most scholars and, certainly, to the general public who are the consumers of their educational services.
With global disruption due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the role of governing boards and their decision-making has become even more critical to institutions' long-term sustainability.
This study utilized a qualitative multiple case study approach to examine how two different types of higher education governing boards (private and public) determine when to make decisions about significant changes within the organization.
To develop an understanding of the operations of a governing board in relation to the change process and leadership change, in-depth interviews were conducted with governing board members from two different higher education institutions in the northeastern United States.
The communication practices between the governing board and the president in particular were explored as a component of the decision-making process, in light of shifts in the educational landscape due to the pandemic.
Through an analysis of governing boards' decision-making process, as well as their structure, culture, governance practices, performance, and relationship to the president of the organization, this study has identified factors that contribute to governing boards' decisions to make significant change.
Related Results
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash
Abstract
This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
A Survey on Beagle Boards and its Applications
A Survey on Beagle Boards and its Applications
<p>This paper consists of an overview and a brief description of all the Beagle Boards from the original Beagle Board released in 2008 to the latest board BeagleV released in...
Implementation of hospital governing boards: views from the field
Implementation of hospital governing boards: views from the field
Abstract
Background
Decentralization through the establishment of hospital governing boards has been touted as an effective way to improve the qu...
Economic Analysis for Nozzle Governing With Overload Valve Regulation Technology
Economic Analysis for Nozzle Governing With Overload Valve Regulation Technology
With the implementation of low-carbon economy policy, clean energy (such as wind and solar energy) has been developing rapidly, and the percentage is increasing year by year; On th...
HIGHER EDUCATION BRANDING
HIGHER EDUCATION BRANDING
Background. The increasing intensity of competition in the international market for higher education services leads to an increase in the importance of brands of higher education i...
Public Higher Education Governing Boards Composition and Regional Difference in U.S.
Public Higher Education Governing Boards Composition and Regional Difference in U.S.
Using The Public Higher Education Boards Database designed by Association of Governing Boards of Universities and Colleges (AGB) in 2008, this paper reviewed prior studies of gover...
Implementasi Pembelajaran IPS Sebagai Penguatan Pendidikan Karakter di Sekolah Dasar
Implementasi Pembelajaran IPS Sebagai Penguatan Pendidikan Karakter di Sekolah Dasar
This study aims to analyze the implementation of social studies learning as strengthening character education in elementary schools. The research method used is a qualitative descr...
Music therapists' decision-making in music together within therapy
Music therapists' decision-making in music together within therapy
Music therapy clinical decision-making for individual parent-dyads has been guided by clinical reflections and program descriptions. Some research in clinical decision-making has b...

