Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Do‐it‐Yourself Mock Community Standard for Multi‐Step Assessment of Microbiome Protocols

View through CrossRef
AbstractMicrobiomes provide critical functions that support animals, plants, and ecosystems. High‐throughput sequencing (HTS) has become an essential tool for the cultivation‐independent study of microbiomes found in diverse environments, but requires effective and meaningful controls. One such critical control is a mock microbial community, which is used as a positive control for nucleic acid extraction, marker gene amplification, and sequencing. While mock community standards can be purchased, they can be costly and often include only medically relevant microbial strains that are not expected to be major players in non‐human microbiomes. As an alternative, it is possible to design and construct a do‐it‐yourself (DIY) mock community, which can then be used as a positive control that is specifically customized to the protocol needs of a particular study system. In this article, we describe protocols to select appropriate microbial strains for the construction of a mock community. We first describe the steps to verify the identity of community members via Sanger sequencing. Then, we provide guidance on assembling and storing the DIY mock community as viable whole cells. This includes steps to create standard growth curves referenced to plate counts for each member, so that the community members can be quantified and later compared in terms of their “expected versus returned” relative contributions after sequencing. We also describe appropriate methods for the cryostorage of the fully assembled mock community as viable whole cells, so that they can be used as a unit in a microbiome analysis, from the lysis and nucleic acid extraction steps onwards. Finally, we provide an example of returned data and interpretation of DIY mock community sequences, discussing how to assess possible contamination and identify protocol biases for particular members. Overall, DIY mock communities serve to determine success and possible bias in a cultivation‐independent microbiome analysis. © 2022 The Authors. Current Protocols published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.Basic Protocol 1: Strain identification and verification using Sanger sequencingBasic Protocol 2: Creation of glycerol stocks of each mock community strain for long‐term cryostorageBasic Protocol 3: Assessment of strain freezer viability without cryoprotectantBasic Protocol 4: Creation of standard curve to determine CFU/ml of a liquid culture as a function of optical densityBasic Protocol 5: Full mock community assembly using community concentration calculations and standard curves
Title: Do‐it‐Yourself Mock Community Standard for Multi‐Step Assessment of Microbiome Protocols
Description:
AbstractMicrobiomes provide critical functions that support animals, plants, and ecosystems.
High‐throughput sequencing (HTS) has become an essential tool for the cultivation‐independent study of microbiomes found in diverse environments, but requires effective and meaningful controls.
One such critical control is a mock microbial community, which is used as a positive control for nucleic acid extraction, marker gene amplification, and sequencing.
While mock community standards can be purchased, they can be costly and often include only medically relevant microbial strains that are not expected to be major players in non‐human microbiomes.
As an alternative, it is possible to design and construct a do‐it‐yourself (DIY) mock community, which can then be used as a positive control that is specifically customized to the protocol needs of a particular study system.
In this article, we describe protocols to select appropriate microbial strains for the construction of a mock community.
We first describe the steps to verify the identity of community members via Sanger sequencing.
Then, we provide guidance on assembling and storing the DIY mock community as viable whole cells.
This includes steps to create standard growth curves referenced to plate counts for each member, so that the community members can be quantified and later compared in terms of their “expected versus returned” relative contributions after sequencing.
We also describe appropriate methods for the cryostorage of the fully assembled mock community as viable whole cells, so that they can be used as a unit in a microbiome analysis, from the lysis and nucleic acid extraction steps onwards.
Finally, we provide an example of returned data and interpretation of DIY mock community sequences, discussing how to assess possible contamination and identify protocol biases for particular members.
Overall, DIY mock communities serve to determine success and possible bias in a cultivation‐independent microbiome analysis.
© 2022 The Authors.
Current Protocols published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Basic Protocol 1: Strain identification and verification using Sanger sequencingBasic Protocol 2: Creation of glycerol stocks of each mock community strain for long‐term cryostorageBasic Protocol 3: Assessment of strain freezer viability without cryoprotectantBasic Protocol 4: Creation of standard curve to determine CFU/ml of a liquid culture as a function of optical densityBasic Protocol 5: Full mock community assembly using community concentration calculations and standard curves.

Related Results

Radiotherapy and the gut microbiome: facts and fiction
Radiotherapy and the gut microbiome: facts and fiction
AbstractAn ever-growing body of evidence has linked the gut microbiome with both the effectiveness and the toxicity of cancer therapies. Radiotherapy is an effective way to treat t...
Supplementary Data from Targeted BiTE Expression by an Oncolytic Vector Augments Therapeutic Efficacy Against Solid Tumors
Supplementary Data from Targeted BiTE Expression by an Oncolytic Vector Augments Therapeutic Efficacy Against Solid Tumors
<p>Supplementary Methods, Supplementary Figures S1-S15 Fig. S1. Purification and binding specificity of MV-encoded BiTEs. (A) Purification of MV-expressed BiTEs. Vero cells w...
Optimizing IETF multimedia signaling protocols and architectures in 3GPP networks : an evolutionary approach
Optimizing IETF multimedia signaling protocols and architectures in 3GPP networks : an evolutionary approach
Signaling in Next Generation IP-based networks heavily relies in the family of multimedia signaling protocols defined by IETF. Two of these signaling protocols are RTSP and SIP, wh...
Quantifying the impact of Human Leukocyte Antigen on the human gut microbiome
Quantifying the impact of Human Leukocyte Antigen on the human gut microbiome
Abstract Objective The gut microbiome is affected by a number of factors, including the innate and adaptive immune system. The ...
Mock-Lie bialgebras and mock-Lie analogue of the classical Yang-Baxter equation
Mock-Lie bialgebras and mock-Lie analogue of the classical Yang-Baxter equation
Abstract The aim of this paper is to introduce the notion of a mock-Lie bialgebra which is equivalent to a Manin triple of mock-Lie algebras. The study of a special case ca...
Interpolation of Microbiome Composition in Longitudinal Datasets
Interpolation of Microbiome Composition in Longitudinal Datasets
Abstract The human gut microbiome significantly impacts health, prompting a rise in longitudinal studies that capture microbiome samples at multiple time points. Su...
Associating population-level variability of the gut microbiome with host phenotypes
Associating population-level variability of the gut microbiome with host phenotypes
The gut microbiome (GM) affects host growth and development, behavior, and disease susceptibility. Biomedical research investigating the mechanisms by which the GM influences host ...

Back to Top