Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Compare the surgical outcome of Fistulectomy and Mucoal advancement flap in perianal fistula.

View through CrossRef
Objective: To compare the fistulectomy with mucosal advancement flap in treatment of perianal fistula in terms of mean hospital stay, frequency of anal incontinence and wound healing time. Study Design: Randomized Control Trial. Setting: Surgical OPD, DHQ and Allied Hospital, Faisalabad. Period: 1st March 2019 to 28 February 2020. Methods: Conducted on 120 (60 in each group) patients with fistula in ano presenting. Sampling technique was Non probability consecutive sampling. All the Patient age ranges from 20-55 years of either gender having perianal fistula which are low lying fistulas and with single external opening are included in study. Patients having perianal abscess, pilonidal sinus, Inflammatory bowel disease (Crohn’s disease, Ulcerative colitis) or with history of tuberculosis, HIV disease, Complex high lying fistulas with multiple external openings are excluded. Results: In our study, group A underwent fistulectomy while on group B we perform mucosal advancement flap. About 56.67%(n=34) in Group A and 50%(n=30) in Group B were between 20-40 years of age while 43.33%(n=26) in Group A and 50%(n=30) in Group B were between 41-55 years of age, mean+SD was calculated as 38.78+9.07 years and 40.12+8.89 years respectively. According to gender division 86.67%(n=52) in Group A and 78.33%(n=47) in Group B were male while 13.33%(n=8) in Group A and 21.67%(n=13) in Group B were females, mean hospital stay was calculated as 93.93+4.56 hours in Group A and 107.95+4.66 hours in Group B, p value was calculated as 0.0001 showing a significant difference between the two groups. Comparison of anal incontinence in both groups was done showing that 13.33% (n=8) in Group A and 23.33%(n=14) in Group B had anal incontinence, p value was calculated as 0.15. At one month postoperative follow-up only 4 patient (6.7%) in group A showed complete wound healing while in group B 28 patients out of 60(46.6%)showed complete wound healing, P value was calculated as 0.00167 showing a significant difference while there is no significant difference in incidence of early post-operative complications. Conclusion: We concluded that hospital stay was significantly decreased in cases with fistulectomy when compared with MAF while there was no significant difference regarding anal incontinence in both groups.
Title: Compare the surgical outcome of Fistulectomy and Mucoal advancement flap in perianal fistula.
Description:
Objective: To compare the fistulectomy with mucosal advancement flap in treatment of perianal fistula in terms of mean hospital stay, frequency of anal incontinence and wound healing time.
Study Design: Randomized Control Trial.
Setting: Surgical OPD, DHQ and Allied Hospital, Faisalabad.
Period: 1st March 2019 to 28 February 2020.
Methods: Conducted on 120 (60 in each group) patients with fistula in ano presenting.
Sampling technique was Non probability consecutive sampling.
All the Patient age ranges from 20-55 years of either gender having perianal fistula which are low lying fistulas and with single external opening are included in study.
Patients having perianal abscess, pilonidal sinus, Inflammatory bowel disease (Crohn’s disease, Ulcerative colitis) or with history of tuberculosis, HIV disease, Complex high lying fistulas with multiple external openings are excluded.
Results: In our study, group A underwent fistulectomy while on group B we perform mucosal advancement flap.
About 56.
67%(n=34) in Group A and 50%(n=30) in Group B were between 20-40 years of age while 43.
33%(n=26) in Group A and 50%(n=30) in Group B were between 41-55 years of age, mean+SD was calculated as 38.
78+9.
07 years and 40.
12+8.
89 years respectively.
According to gender division 86.
67%(n=52) in Group A and 78.
33%(n=47) in Group B were male while 13.
33%(n=8) in Group A and 21.
67%(n=13) in Group B were females, mean hospital stay was calculated as 93.
93+4.
56 hours in Group A and 107.
95+4.
66 hours in Group B, p value was calculated as 0.
0001 showing a significant difference between the two groups.
Comparison of anal incontinence in both groups was done showing that 13.
33% (n=8) in Group A and 23.
33%(n=14) in Group B had anal incontinence, p value was calculated as 0.
15.
At one month postoperative follow-up only 4 patient (6.
7%) in group A showed complete wound healing while in group B 28 patients out of 60(46.
6%)showed complete wound healing, P value was calculated as 0.
00167 showing a significant difference while there is no significant difference in incidence of early post-operative complications.
Conclusion: We concluded that hospital stay was significantly decreased in cases with fistulectomy when compared with MAF while there was no significant difference regarding anal incontinence in both groups.

Related Results

Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Abstarct Introduction Isolated brain hydatid disease (BHD) is an extremely rare form of echinococcosis. A prompt and timely diagnosis is a crucial step in disease management. This ...
Women’s knowledge of symptoms of obstetric fistula, experiences, and associated factors in Sierra Leone
Women’s knowledge of symptoms of obstetric fistula, experiences, and associated factors in Sierra Leone
Background Obstetric fistula is a devastating childbirth condition that results from prolonged obstructed labour without timely medical intervention, leading to a tear between the ...
Early Postoperative Pain in Video Assisted Anal Fistula Treatment Versus Open Fistulectomy
Early Postoperative Pain in Video Assisted Anal Fistula Treatment Versus Open Fistulectomy
Introduction: Anal fistulas are chronic anorectal infections with constant pus containing discharge from the perianal region which can only be treated surgically. Aims & ...
Management of acute perianal abscess: is surgeon specialization associated with improved outcomes?
Management of acute perianal abscess: is surgeon specialization associated with improved outcomes?
AbstractBackgroundAcute surgical units (ASU) are increasingly being adopted and in our system are staffed by colorectal and non‐colorectal general surgeons. This study aims to eval...
COMPARISON OF FISTULECTOMY VS LIFT PROCEDURE FOR ANAL FISTULA MANAGEMENT
COMPARISON OF FISTULECTOMY VS LIFT PROCEDURE FOR ANAL FISTULA MANAGEMENT
Background: Although anal fistulae are benign, the condition can still negatively influence a patient’s quality of life. Despite its long history and prevalence, anal fistula manag...
Clinical Application of the Internal Mammary Artery Perforator Adipofascial Flap
Clinical Application of the Internal Mammary Artery Perforator Adipofascial Flap
Background: Skin ulcers on the anterior chest wall are caused mainly by radiation therapy for breast cancer and anterior mediastinitis after thoracotomy, and they are o...
Research and Analysis for Cancerous Perianal Disease
Research and Analysis for Cancerous Perianal Disease
<p><strong>Objective</strong> To analyze cancerous perianal disease. This study summed up the effective measures for prevention and treatment of perianal cancer p...

Back to Top