Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Antitrust and Global Capitalism, 1930–2004
View through CrossRef
The international spread of antitrust suggested the historical process shaping global capitalism. By the 1930s, Americans feared that big business exceeded the government's capacity to impose accountability, engendering the most aggressive antitrust campaign in history. Meanwhile, big business had emerged to varying degrees in liberal Britain, Australia and France, Nazi Germany, and militarist Japan. These same nations nonetheless expressly rejected American-style antitrust as unsuited to their cultures and institutions. After World War II, however, governments in these nations - as well as the European Community - adopted workable antitrust regimes. By the millennium antitrust was instrumental to the clash between state sovereignty and globalization. What ideological and institutional factors explain the global change from opposing to supporting antitrust? Addressing this question, this book throws new light on the struggle over liberal capitalism during the Great Depression and World War II, the postwar Allied occupations of Japan and Germany, the reaction against American big-business hegemony during the Cold War, and the clash over globalization and the WTO.
Title: Antitrust and Global Capitalism, 1930–2004
Description:
The international spread of antitrust suggested the historical process shaping global capitalism.
By the 1930s, Americans feared that big business exceeded the government's capacity to impose accountability, engendering the most aggressive antitrust campaign in history.
Meanwhile, big business had emerged to varying degrees in liberal Britain, Australia and France, Nazi Germany, and militarist Japan.
These same nations nonetheless expressly rejected American-style antitrust as unsuited to their cultures and institutions.
After World War II, however, governments in these nations - as well as the European Community - adopted workable antitrust regimes.
By the millennium antitrust was instrumental to the clash between state sovereignty and globalization.
What ideological and institutional factors explain the global change from opposing to supporting antitrust? Addressing this question, this book throws new light on the struggle over liberal capitalism during the Great Depression and World War II, the postwar Allied occupations of Japan and Germany, the reaction against American big-business hegemony during the Cold War, and the clash over globalization and the WTO.
Related Results
Capitalism, Democratic Capitalism, and the Pursuit of Antitrust Laws
Capitalism, Democratic Capitalism, and the Pursuit of Antitrust Laws
A major global policy development in the last few decades has been the adoption of national antitrust laws by many developing and transition countries. A primarily American creatio...
New Brandeis’s New Battleground
New Brandeis’s New Battleground
The neo-Brandeisian movement swept through antitrust like wildfire, hurtling its adherents into prominent Biden Administration posts. But it threatens to be a flash in the pan. Thr...
Time for a New Sherman Act? The Debate on Antitrust Reform in Historical Perspective
Time for a New Sherman Act? The Debate on Antitrust Reform in Historical Perspective
The Sherman Antitrust Act (“Sherman Act” or “Act”), the Federal Trade Commission Act of 1914, and the Clayton Antitrust Act represent the core antitrust statutes. While these core ...
A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CAPITALISM: MAX WEBER AND MILTON FRIEDMAN
A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CAPITALISM: MAX WEBER AND MILTON FRIEDMAN
Purpose- The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism," and Milton Friedman's influential book, "Capitalism and Freedom," offer valuable insights into the intricate relationsh...
Capitalism as religion: From Max Weber to Giorgio Agamben through Walter Benjamin
Capitalism as religion: From Max Weber to Giorgio Agamben through Walter Benjamin
The article, based on the work “Protestant Ethics and the Spirit of Capitalism” explores the concept of «capitalism» by Max Weber, as well as a critique of capitalism itself based ...
Effectuating Antitrust's Democratic Function
Effectuating Antitrust's Democratic Function
The antitrust laws have a democratic function, not merely an economic one. As a fundamental legal system of political, economic, and social ordering, the antitrust laws sustain and...
Measuring the Antitrust Revolution
Measuring the Antitrust Revolution
Although antitrust always evolved with the economics of its time, economic analysis was not central to the antitrust enterprise until Continental T.V. Inc. v. GTE Sylvania. In doin...
American Gothic: How Chicago Economics Distorts “Consumer Welfare” in Antitrust
American Gothic: How Chicago Economics Distorts “Consumer Welfare” in Antitrust
Since the publication of Robert Bork’s The Antitrust Paradox, lawyers, judges, and many economists have defended “Consumer welfare” (CW) as a standard for decisions about antitrust...

