Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Going Public and Presidential Leadership
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Going public is the preeminent governing strategy of modern presidents. When presidents go public, they attempt to influence the decisions, actions, and opinions of others through speechmaking and other public engagement. Although some scholars of the rhetorical presidency show how presidents have used speeches to govern since the dawn of American democracy, the bulk of scholarship centers on the modern presidency, as both advances in communications technologies and changes in federal policymaking institutions spurred presidents to go public.
Going public as a leadership strategy involves a variety of presidential speeches designed to reach a range of institutions and actors. Strategies include going local, speaking on national television, or saturating news coverage by sustaining attention to a top priority. The president’s target audience can be Congress, the public, news media, or bureaucracy. Presidents have had some success going public, although the ways in which presidents have been successful vary by strategy and target audience.
Going public is more than just presidential leadership of others. It is also about what incentivizes the president’s efforts to use speeches to govern in the first place. Thus, a second focus of research on going public is what explains speechmaking and the tendency of presidents to respond to those institutions and actors that they also attempt to lead. The majority of existing research centers on presidential leadership of, and responsiveness to, mass public opinion, but the emergence of a more polarized public may influence why presidents go public and may change what political scientists conclude concerning going public and presidential leadership in a more polarized political age.
Oxford University PressNew York, NY
Title: Going Public and Presidential Leadership
Description:
Abstract
Going public is the preeminent governing strategy of modern presidents.
When presidents go public, they attempt to influence the decisions, actions, and opinions of others through speechmaking and other public engagement.
Although some scholars of the rhetorical presidency show how presidents have used speeches to govern since the dawn of American democracy, the bulk of scholarship centers on the modern presidency, as both advances in communications technologies and changes in federal policymaking institutions spurred presidents to go public.
Going public as a leadership strategy involves a variety of presidential speeches designed to reach a range of institutions and actors.
Strategies include going local, speaking on national television, or saturating news coverage by sustaining attention to a top priority.
The president’s target audience can be Congress, the public, news media, or bureaucracy.
Presidents have had some success going public, although the ways in which presidents have been successful vary by strategy and target audience.
Going public is more than just presidential leadership of others.
It is also about what incentivizes the president’s efforts to use speeches to govern in the first place.
Thus, a second focus of research on going public is what explains speechmaking and the tendency of presidents to respond to those institutions and actors that they also attempt to lead.
The majority of existing research centers on presidential leadership of, and responsiveness to, mass public opinion, but the emergence of a more polarized public may influence why presidents go public and may change what political scientists conclude concerning going public and presidential leadership in a more polarized political age.
Related Results
Why People Stay: How Leadership Competence, Trust, and Organisational Culture May Influence Employee Retention
Why People Stay: How Leadership Competence, Trust, and Organisational Culture May Influence Employee Retention
Employee retention is defined as pay, workload, career opportunities and employment conditions. These factors matter, but do not explain why employees choose to stay in some organi...
A Christian Servant Leadership Model and Training for the Adventist Church in France
A Christian Servant Leadership Model and Training for the Adventist Church in France
Problem. French history (the French Revolution) has shaped a country considered as one of the most secular in the world. The Seventh-day Adventist Church in France is profoundly af...
Collective leadership development in the civic arena
Collective leadership development in the civic arena
Purpose
As a collective paradigm of leadership emerges in the literature, many community leadership programs still align with leader-centric perspectives. The K...
Presidential Control and Administrative Capacity
Presidential Control and Administrative Capacity
<div>
Presidential control is the power to direct administrative capacity toward the President’s own policy objectives. Accordingly, presidential power vis-à-vis administrat...
Tauhi Vā Māfana: Tongan leadership and culture in the New Zealand Public Service
Tauhi Vā Māfana: Tongan leadership and culture in the New Zealand Public Service
<p>How does knowledge of cultural practices help us think differently about how leadership is understood and practised in a particular context? This thesis presents a Tongan ...
Ten propositions about public leadership
Ten propositions about public leadership
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of some pressing but under-researched aspects of public leadership. Ten propositions about public leadership are set out ...
How successful entrepreneurs lead? : Multi-method Analysis of Entrepreneurial Leadership
How successful entrepreneurs lead? : Multi-method Analysis of Entrepreneurial Leadership
There has been recently an emerging academic debate on entrepreneurial leadership style and related contingency models No generally accepted model for entrepreneurial leadership st...
Teacher leadership and collective efficacy: teacher perceptions in three US school districts
Teacher leadership and collective efficacy: teacher perceptions in three US school districts
Purpose
– Collective efficacy and teacher leadership, two constructs central to school reform, were examined in this quantitative study of three school districts. T...

