Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Too noisy to sleep safely?—An observational study of noise levels and distractions during critical phases of pediatric anesthesia

View through CrossRef
AbstractBackgroundNoise and distraction are recognized as contributing factors in critical incidents associated with surgery and anesthesia. In addition, excessive noise exposure can have negative effects on patients and staff members in these environments.AimsWe aimed to quantify noise exposure of the anesthesiology team and patients in pediatric operating theaters, comparing them to adult studies, internationally recognized standards, and identifying factors contributing to noise and/or distraction.MethodsWe measured noise levels during three phases of anesthesia (pre‐induction, induction, and postinduction/maintenance) and recorded additional environmental sources of distraction and noise.ResultsWe included 49 theater cases. The median and interquartile range (IQR) of mean noise levels during pre‐induction, induction, and maintenance were 61 (59.7‐63.5), 61.9 (60.6‐63.3), and 61.6 (60.4‐63.7) dB, respectively, while the median (IQR) of maximal noise levels was 81.4 (77.3‐86.8), 83.7 (78.5‐87.4), and 86.3 (84.6‐90.4), respectively. There was an average of 8.3 people present in the room during induction. In 23 cases, there were additional unnecessary conversations occurring within the room at induction. We noted the maintenance phase was the noisiest phase of anesthesia. We recorded frequent potential sources of distraction during pre‐induction and induction, though no significant correlations between these distractions and recorded noise levels.ConclusionsWe documented noise levels well above recommended levels during all phases of pediatric anesthesia. We highlighted factors with potential to contribute to noise and distraction but found no statistically significant correlation with noise levels.
Title: Too noisy to sleep safely?—An observational study of noise levels and distractions during critical phases of pediatric anesthesia
Description:
AbstractBackgroundNoise and distraction are recognized as contributing factors in critical incidents associated with surgery and anesthesia.
In addition, excessive noise exposure can have negative effects on patients and staff members in these environments.
AimsWe aimed to quantify noise exposure of the anesthesiology team and patients in pediatric operating theaters, comparing them to adult studies, internationally recognized standards, and identifying factors contributing to noise and/or distraction.
MethodsWe measured noise levels during three phases of anesthesia (pre‐induction, induction, and postinduction/maintenance) and recorded additional environmental sources of distraction and noise.
ResultsWe included 49 theater cases.
The median and interquartile range (IQR) of mean noise levels during pre‐induction, induction, and maintenance were 61 (59.
7‐63.
5), 61.
9 (60.
6‐63.
3), and 61.
6 (60.
4‐63.
7) dB, respectively, while the median (IQR) of maximal noise levels was 81.
4 (77.
3‐86.
8), 83.
7 (78.
5‐87.
4), and 86.
3 (84.
6‐90.
4), respectively.
There was an average of 8.
3 people present in the room during induction.
In 23 cases, there were additional unnecessary conversations occurring within the room at induction.
We noted the maintenance phase was the noisiest phase of anesthesia.
We recorded frequent potential sources of distraction during pre‐induction and induction, though no significant correlations between these distractions and recorded noise levels.
ConclusionsWe documented noise levels well above recommended levels during all phases of pediatric anesthesia.
We highlighted factors with potential to contribute to noise and distraction but found no statistically significant correlation with noise levels.

Related Results

Acupuncture as therapeutic resource in patient with bruxism
Acupuncture as therapeutic resource in patient with bruxism
Bruxism is the harmful habit of clenching or grinding the teeth during the day and / or night, with unconscious pattern, with particular intensity and frequency, outside the functi...
A distractions capture tool for cardiac surgery and lung transplantation: impact on outcomes
A distractions capture tool for cardiac surgery and lung transplantation: impact on outcomes
Abstract Objectives Surgical distractions are associated with worse patient outcomes. Lung transplantation and cardiac surgery’s multi-disciplinary ...
Environmental History of Oceanic Noise Pollution
Environmental History of Oceanic Noise Pollution
The concept of “ocean noise” precedes the concept of “ocean noise pollution” by about half a century. Those seeking a body of scholarly literature on ocean noise as an environmenta...
The Pediatric Anesthesiology Workforce: Projecting Supply and Trends 2015–2035
The Pediatric Anesthesiology Workforce: Projecting Supply and Trends 2015–2035
BACKGROUND: A workforce analysis was conducted to predict whether the projected future supply of pediatric anesthesiologists is balanced with the requirements o...
0864 Severe Central Sleep Apnea
0864 Severe Central Sleep Apnea
Abstract Introduction Central sleep apnea (CSA) is a rare form of sleep disordered breathing with repeated apneic episodes with ...
The Geographic Distribution of Pediatric Anesthesiologists Relative to the US Pediatric Population
The Geographic Distribution of Pediatric Anesthesiologists Relative to the US Pediatric Population
BACKGROUND: The geographic relationship between pediatric anesthesiologists and the pediatric population has potentially important clinical and policy implications. In ...

Back to Top