Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Comparison of complete nasal packing with and without integrated airways

View through CrossRef
Objective: To compare the effects of nasal packing using a Nasopore nasal packing with and without an airway tube on postoperative pain, SpO2, nasal obstruction, and difficulty in breathing complaints. Methods: This comparative study was conducted at Dow University of Health Sciences (DUHS), DMC Civil Hospital Karachi between September 18, 2021, to May 19, 2022. A total of 70 patients who underwent septoplasty for septal deviation and chronic hypertrophic rhinitis were equally divided into two groups. Group-A patients received nasal packing using a Nasopore nasal packing with an airway tube, and Group-B patients received nasal packing using a Nasopore nasal packing without an airway tube. Post-operation Nasal pain sensations were measured using the Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale at 2 and 12 hours. SpO2 was measured at 30 minutes pre-operatively with an O2 saturation monitor and 12 hours post-operatively during sleep. Results: The postoperative pain at two hours and 12 hours was compared between the two groups, and a significant difference was observed. In Group-A, the average SpO2 decreased > 4% from baseline in 5.7% patients, and 37% in Group-B. A significant difference was observed in the severity of nasal obstruction and difficulty breathing, P-value < 0.05. Conclusion: It is concluded that septoplasty followed by applying nasal packing with integrated airway reduces postoperative pain and improves oxygen saturation compared to nasal packing without integrated airways. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.39.5.7478 How to cite this: Jamil A, Hameed HA, Sidiqqui AH, Farrukh M.S. Comparison of complete nasal packing with and without integrated airways. Pak J Med Sci. 2023;39(5):1317-1320. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.39.5.7478 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Title: Comparison of complete nasal packing with and without integrated airways
Description:
Objective: To compare the effects of nasal packing using a Nasopore nasal packing with and without an airway tube on postoperative pain, SpO2, nasal obstruction, and difficulty in breathing complaints.
Methods: This comparative study was conducted at Dow University of Health Sciences (DUHS), DMC Civil Hospital Karachi between September 18, 2021, to May 19, 2022.
A total of 70 patients who underwent septoplasty for septal deviation and chronic hypertrophic rhinitis were equally divided into two groups.
Group-A patients received nasal packing using a Nasopore nasal packing with an airway tube, and Group-B patients received nasal packing using a Nasopore nasal packing without an airway tube.
Post-operation Nasal pain sensations were measured using the Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale at 2 and 12 hours.
SpO2 was measured at 30 minutes pre-operatively with an O2 saturation monitor and 12 hours post-operatively during sleep.
Results: The postoperative pain at two hours and 12 hours was compared between the two groups, and a significant difference was observed.
In Group-A, the average SpO2 decreased > 4% from baseline in 5.
7% patients, and 37% in Group-B.
A significant difference was observed in the severity of nasal obstruction and difficulty breathing, P-value < 0.
05.
Conclusion: It is concluded that septoplasty followed by applying nasal packing with integrated airway reduces postoperative pain and improves oxygen saturation compared to nasal packing without integrated airways.
doi: https://doi.
org/10.
12669/pjms.
39.
5.
7478 How to cite this: Jamil A, Hameed HA, Sidiqqui AH, Farrukh M.
S.
Comparison of complete nasal packing with and without integrated airways.
Pak J Med Sci.
2023;39(5):1317-1320.
doi: https://doi.
org/10.
12669/pjms.
39.
5.
7478 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.
org/licenses/by/3.
0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related Results

Association of breathing patterns and quality of life in patients with nasal obstruction
Association of breathing patterns and quality of life in patients with nasal obstruction
Introduction: In the general population, nasal obstruction is a common complaint. However, an objective evaluation of nasal obstruction is difficult. Nose examination, computed tom...
Intranasal pressure splints - a reliable alternative to nasal packing in septal sur
Intranasal pressure splints - a reliable alternative to nasal packing in septal sur
Objective: To compare the outcome of nasal packing and intranasal pressure splints in patients undergoing septoplasty. Study design: Randomized controlled trial.Place and Duration ...
New Gravel Pack Tool for Improving Pack Placement
New Gravel Pack Tool for Improving Pack Placement
A new type of gravel packing tool may eliminate the need for the pressure washing and repacking that are frequently required. This tool performs equally well in vertical wells and ...
The effect of nasal tramazoline with dexamethasone in obstructive sleep apnoea patients
The effect of nasal tramazoline with dexamethasone in obstructive sleep apnoea patients
Although there is a strong correlation between oral/oro-nasal breathing and apnoea/hypopnoea index in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea and normal nasal resistance at wakefuln...
EUSTACHIAN TUBE DYSFUNCTION FOLLOWING ANTERIOR NASAL PACKING
EUSTACHIAN TUBE DYSFUNCTION FOLLOWING ANTERIOR NASAL PACKING
Background: Eustachian tube maintains middle ear pressure equal to that of atmosphere and helps in ventilation of middle ear. Its function may be deranged due to adenoids, cleft pa...
Reconstructive Approaches to Nasal Defects
Reconstructive Approaches to Nasal Defects
Nasal reconstruction is commonly performed for treatment of defects arising from excision of nonmelanoma skin cancers, although other tumors, trauma, or infection may also result i...

Back to Top