Javascript must be enabled to continue!
John Duns Scotus
View through CrossRef
This chapter argues that John Duns Scotus has several goals in the epistemology of theology: logical consistency, certainty, truth, and right praxis. The first section covers the natural knowledge of God, in which Scotus defends the claim that there are some non-complex univocal concepts, that they can be the building blocks of complex analogical concepts, and that univocal and analogical concepts are applicable to God and to creatures. A genealogy is given of three exegetical mistakes regarding univocity made by some twentieth-century thinkers. The second section covers five ways that one can have supernatural knowledge of God: intuitive cognition, abstractive cognition with the possibility of doubt, abstractive cognition without the opportunity for doubt, biblical exegesis, and faith. The next section discusses the scientific character of theology, and how such knowledge is literally a part of the praxis of loving God. The conclusion discusses how theology can resolve dilemmas in a naturalistic epistemology.
Title: John Duns Scotus
Description:
This chapter argues that John Duns Scotus has several goals in the epistemology of theology: logical consistency, certainty, truth, and right praxis.
The first section covers the natural knowledge of God, in which Scotus defends the claim that there are some non-complex univocal concepts, that they can be the building blocks of complex analogical concepts, and that univocal and analogical concepts are applicable to God and to creatures.
A genealogy is given of three exegetical mistakes regarding univocity made by some twentieth-century thinkers.
The second section covers five ways that one can have supernatural knowledge of God: intuitive cognition, abstractive cognition with the possibility of doubt, abstractive cognition without the opportunity for doubt, biblical exegesis, and faith.
The next section discusses the scientific character of theology, and how such knowledge is literally a part of the praxis of loving God.
The conclusion discusses how theology can resolve dilemmas in a naturalistic epistemology.
Related Results
8. Foreknowledge and freedom (Boethius and Gersonides)
8. Foreknowledge and freedom (Boethius and Gersonides)
Most people take it for granted that some future events are contingent, but ‘Foreknowledge and freedom (Boethius and Gersonides)’ considers the ‘problem of prescience’, which arise...
Being and Nothing
Being and Nothing
In this masterful work, leading German philosopher Lorenz B. Puntel answers the primordial question of philosophy: "Why is there Being at all and not absolutely nothing?"
...
The Historical Collections of Walter of Coventry
The Historical Collections of Walter of Coventry
Little is known about Walter of Coventry (fl.1293) beyond the fact that he was alive during the reign of Edward I and that this substantive historical compilation was prepared eith...
Emperor John II Komnenos
Emperor John II Komnenos
Abstract
John II Komnenos was born into an empire on the brink of destruction, with his father Alexios barely preserving it in the face of civil wars and invasions. ...
Isaac of Nineveh’s Eschatology
Isaac of Nineveh’s Eschatology
This chapter shows that the primary source for Isaac’s eschatology is John the Solitary’s depiction of the life of the future world. According to John, transformation in the future...
What John Knew and What John Wrote
What John Knew and What John Wrote
In this book, Wendy E. S. North investigates whether or not the author of John could have crafted his Gospel with knowledge of the Synoptics. Unlike previous approaches, which have...

