Javascript must be enabled to continue!
What Obergefell v. Hodges Should Have Said
View through CrossRef
The authors of this book, sitting as a hypothetical Supreme Court, rewrite the famous 2015 opinion in Obergefell v. Hodges, which guaranteed same-sex couples the right to marry. In eleven incisive opinions, the authors offer the best constitutional arguments for and against the right to same-sex marriage, and debate what Obergefell should mean for the future. In addition to serving as Chief Justice of this imaginary court, the book's editor provides a critical introduction to the case. He recounts the story of the gay rights litigation that led to Obergefell, and he explains how courts respond to political mobilizations for new rights claims. The social movement for gay rights and marriage equality is a powerful example of how — through legal imagination and political struggle — arguments once dismissed as “off-the-wall” can later become established in American constitutional law.
Yale University Press
Title: What Obergefell v. Hodges Should Have Said
Description:
The authors of this book, sitting as a hypothetical Supreme Court, rewrite the famous 2015 opinion in Obergefell v.
Hodges, which guaranteed same-sex couples the right to marry.
In eleven incisive opinions, the authors offer the best constitutional arguments for and against the right to same-sex marriage, and debate what Obergefell should mean for the future.
In addition to serving as Chief Justice of this imaginary court, the book's editor provides a critical introduction to the case.
He recounts the story of the gay rights litigation that led to Obergefell, and he explains how courts respond to political mobilizations for new rights claims.
The social movement for gay rights and marriage equality is a powerful example of how — through legal imagination and political struggle — arguments once dismissed as “off-the-wall” can later become established in American constitutional law.
Related Results
Reading DeBoer and Obergefell through the “Moral Readings Versus Originalisms”. Debate: from Constitutional “Empty Cupboards” to Evolving Understandings
Reading DeBoer and Obergefell through the “Moral Readings Versus Originalisms”. Debate: from Constitutional “Empty Cupboards” to Evolving Understandings
This essay assesses the debate over “moral reading” and “originalist” approaches to constitutional interpretation, as elaborated in James E. Fleming, Fidelity to Our Imperfect Cons...
Rewriting Obergefell
Rewriting Obergefell
This chapter details a series of eleven opinions by leading public law experts on rewriting the opinion in Obergefell v. Hodges. It introduces the constitutional issues at the hear...
Same-Sex Marriage: Exploring the Implications of Obergefell v Hodges on the Philippines’ Muslim Law of Marriage and the 1987 Constitution
Same-Sex Marriage: Exploring the Implications of Obergefell v Hodges on the Philippines’ Muslim Law of Marriage and the 1987 Constitution
In view of the recent development brought about by the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in Obergefell v. Hodges, jurisdictions that retain the traditional definition of marriage ...
Conversions of Jacob Hodges: Religion, Race, and Labor in Prison Reform Literature
Conversions of Jacob Hodges: Religion, Race, and Labor in Prison Reform Literature
Abstract: Born to a free Black family, Jack Hodges (ca. 1763–1842) was arrested for the murder of a white man in 1819 and served a term at New York's Auburn State Prison, the world...
LGBTQ WORKPLACE INCLUSION BEFORE AND AFTER OBERGEFELL V. HODGES: ASSOCIATION WITH TOBIN’S Q AND ROA
LGBTQ WORKPLACE INCLUSION BEFORE AND AFTER OBERGEFELL V. HODGES: ASSOCIATION WITH TOBIN’S Q AND ROA
Diversity and inclusion advocates claim organizations benefit from diversity. Diversity is purportedly associated with many positive outcomes such as increased creativit...
What Obergefell v. Hodges Should Have Said, Concurring Opinion
What Obergefell v. Hodges Should Have Said, Concurring Opinion
Professor Jack Balkin has convened a group of scholars to author their own opinions in What Obergefell v. Hodges Should Have Said (forthcoming 2020). Ours concurs in the majority’...
Das Bild der südasiatischen Architektur in den Texten von William Hodges
Das Bild der südasiatischen Architektur in den Texten von William Hodges
Im Zusammenhang mit der Kolonialisierung beginnen Europäer sich für die Kunstund Architekturgeschichte Südasiens zu interessieren und diese systematisch zu studieren. Zu den frühes...
Queer as U.S. Constitutional History
Queer as U.S. Constitutional History
This symposium marks the tenth anniversary of the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Obergefell v. Hodges. To help scholars understand the significance of the decision, we invited essa...

