Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Retrofitting to Last – Selecting Optimal Wildlife Protection Products

View through CrossRef
Many power pylons in raptor habitat pose high electrocution risk to raptors, which can be mitigated with insulation products. Retrofitting may require a service outage and can be expensive; labor costs are often far greater than materials. Because concrete, steel and, wood pylons often last for 50 years or more, utilities that select high quality raptor mitigation products receive much greater yield on their investment. To maximize mitigation success, utility engineers should consider specific environmental stresses that may affect product longevity and effectiveness in their service area. IEEE 1656–2010 – IEEE Guide (DOI: 10.1109/IEEESTD.2011.5722090)40 for Testing the Electrical, Mechanical, and Durability Performance of Wildlife Protective Devices on Overhead Power Distribution Systems Rated up to 38 kV recommends a sequence of test procedures designed to ensure that products will not compromise system performance and that products will be effective and durable despite long-term exposure to UV, high winds, and/or salt fog. A growing number of vendors have performed IEEE 1656 testing, which facilitates direct comparison between competing products; however, test reports must be carefully reviewed because not all vendors have strictly followed IEEE guidance. Field implementation is a key determinant of project success, therefore linemen should have an opportunity to test candidate products in real-world situations and assess whether they are easy to install within utility safety and work practices and are compatible with the system. The goal of wildlife mitigation product selection is to identify an optimal suite of products that will: a) minimize the possibility of an animal electrocution or related outage; b) provide a long service life; and c) be readily adopted by field staff.
Title: Retrofitting to Last – Selecting Optimal Wildlife Protection Products
Description:
Many power pylons in raptor habitat pose high electrocution risk to raptors, which can be mitigated with insulation products.
Retrofitting may require a service outage and can be expensive; labor costs are often far greater than materials.
Because concrete, steel and, wood pylons often last for 50 years or more, utilities that select high quality raptor mitigation products receive much greater yield on their investment.
To maximize mitigation success, utility engineers should consider specific environmental stresses that may affect product longevity and effectiveness in their service area.
IEEE 1656–2010 – IEEE Guide (DOI: 10.
1109/IEEESTD.
2011.
5722090)40 for Testing the Electrical, Mechanical, and Durability Performance of Wildlife Protective Devices on Overhead Power Distribution Systems Rated up to 38 kV recommends a sequence of test procedures designed to ensure that products will not compromise system performance and that products will be effective and durable despite long-term exposure to UV, high winds, and/or salt fog.
A growing number of vendors have performed IEEE 1656 testing, which facilitates direct comparison between competing products; however, test reports must be carefully reviewed because not all vendors have strictly followed IEEE guidance.
Field implementation is a key determinant of project success, therefore linemen should have an opportunity to test candidate products in real-world situations and assess whether they are easy to install within utility safety and work practices and are compatible with the system.
The goal of wildlife mitigation product selection is to identify an optimal suite of products that will: a) minimize the possibility of an animal electrocution or related outage; b) provide a long service life; and c) be readily adopted by field staff.

Related Results

Wildlife law and policy
Wildlife law and policy
One of the crucial issues of our decades is how to stop the loss of biodiversity. Policy–makers need reliable data to base their decisions on. Managing wildlife p...
PASTORALIST-WILDLIFE RELATIONSHIP IN THE AMBOSELI ECOSYSTEM SOUTHEASTERN KENYA: A CASE STUDY OF MAASAI COMMUNITY
PASTORALIST-WILDLIFE RELATIONSHIP IN THE AMBOSELI ECOSYSTEM SOUTHEASTERN KENYA: A CASE STUDY OF MAASAI COMMUNITY
Purpose: To establish the pastoralist-wildlife relationship in the Amboseli Ecosystem South Eastern Kenya.Methodology: The study utilized a descriptive research design.Findings: Re...
Comparison of Wildlife Protection Law between Indonesia and the United States
Comparison of Wildlife Protection Law between Indonesia and the United States
Indonesia is known as one of the richest countries for its biodiversity. Plants, animals, and forest are very diverse in every region in Indonesia. Unfortunately, from time to time...
How Community Members Engage With Wildlife—A Psychological Typology With Implications for Policy Making
How Community Members Engage With Wildlife—A Psychological Typology With Implications for Policy Making
ABSTRACTCommunity perceptions influence wildlife‐related management and policy efforts. However, there remains limited research into population‐level social and psychological aspec...
[RETRACTED] Optimal Max Keto - Does It ReallyWork? v1
[RETRACTED] Optimal Max Keto - Does It ReallyWork? v1
[RETRACTED]Shedding the unwanted weight and controlling the calories of your body is the most challenging and complicated process. As we start aging, we have to deal with lots of...
Rearticulating the myth of human–wildlife conflict
Rearticulating the myth of human–wildlife conflict
AbstractHuman–wildlife conflict has emerged as the central vocabulary for cases requiring balance between resource demands of humans and wildlife. This phrase is problematic becaus...

Back to Top