Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Value‐based care in hepatology
View through CrossRef
The migration from legacy fee‐for‐service reimbursement to payments linked to high‐value health care is accelerating in the United States because of new legislation and redesign of payments from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Because patients with chronic diseases account for substantial use of health care resources, payers and health systems are focusing on maximizing the value of care for these patients. Because chronic liver diseases impose a major health burden worldwide affecting the health and lives of many individuals and families as well as substantial costs for individuals and payers, hepatologists must understand how they can improve their practices. Hepatologists practice a high‐intensity cognitive subspecialty, using complex and costly procedures and medications. High‐value patient care requires multidisciplinary coordination, labor‐intensive support for critically ill patients, and effective chronic disease management. Under current fee‐for‐service reimbursement, patient values, medical success, and financial success can all be misaligned. Many current attempts to link health outcomes to reimbursement are based on compliance with process measures, with less emphasis on outcomes that matter most to patients, thus slowing transformation to higher‐value team‐based care. Outcome measures that reflect the entire cycle of care are needed to assist both clinicians and administrators in improving the quality and value of care. A comprehensive set of outcome measures for liver diseases is not currently available. Numerous researchers now are attempting to fill this gap by devising and testing outcome indicators and patient‐reported outcomes for the major liver conditions. These indicators will provide tools to implement a value‐based approach for patients with chronic liver diseases to compare results and value of care between referral centers, to perform health technology assessment, and to guide decision‐making processes for health authorities. This review sets the groundwork for implementing a value‐based, patient‐centered approach to chronic liver diseases within a health system. (Hepatology 2017;65:1749‐1755).
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Title: Value‐based care in hepatology
Description:
The migration from legacy fee‐for‐service reimbursement to payments linked to high‐value health care is accelerating in the United States because of new legislation and redesign of payments from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.
Because patients with chronic diseases account for substantial use of health care resources, payers and health systems are focusing on maximizing the value of care for these patients.
Because chronic liver diseases impose a major health burden worldwide affecting the health and lives of many individuals and families as well as substantial costs for individuals and payers, hepatologists must understand how they can improve their practices.
Hepatologists practice a high‐intensity cognitive subspecialty, using complex and costly procedures and medications.
High‐value patient care requires multidisciplinary coordination, labor‐intensive support for critically ill patients, and effective chronic disease management.
Under current fee‐for‐service reimbursement, patient values, medical success, and financial success can all be misaligned.
Many current attempts to link health outcomes to reimbursement are based on compliance with process measures, with less emphasis on outcomes that matter most to patients, thus slowing transformation to higher‐value team‐based care.
Outcome measures that reflect the entire cycle of care are needed to assist both clinicians and administrators in improving the quality and value of care.
A comprehensive set of outcome measures for liver diseases is not currently available.
Numerous researchers now are attempting to fill this gap by devising and testing outcome indicators and patient‐reported outcomes for the major liver conditions.
These indicators will provide tools to implement a value‐based approach for patients with chronic liver diseases to compare results and value of care between referral centers, to perform health technology assessment, and to guide decision‐making processes for health authorities.
This review sets the groundwork for implementing a value‐based, patient‐centered approach to chronic liver diseases within a health system.
(Hepatology 2017;65:1749‐1755).
Related Results
The Impact of IL28B Gene Polymorphisms on Drug Responses
The Impact of IL28B Gene Polymorphisms on Drug Responses
To achieve high therapeutic efficacy in the patient, information on pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacogenetics is required. With the development of science and techno...
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash
Abstract
This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
Evidence-based intrapartum care practice and its associated factors among obstetric care providers working in hospitals of the four Wollega Zones, Oromia Region, West Ethiopia, 2022
Evidence-based intrapartum care practice and its associated factors among obstetric care providers working in hospitals of the four Wollega Zones, Oromia Region, West Ethiopia, 2022
AbstractBackgroundEven though Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) is a key component of quality of Intrapartum care and links to improved health care outcomes, consistent application of ...
Evidence-based intrapartum care practice and associated factors among obstetric care providers working in hospitals of the four Wollega Zones, Oromia, Ethiopia
Evidence-based intrapartum care practice and associated factors among obstetric care providers working in hospitals of the four Wollega Zones, Oromia, Ethiopia
BackgroundEven though Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) is a key component of quality of Intrapartum care and links to improved health care outcomes, consistent application of EBP in p...
Smart Glasses for Caring Situations in Complex Care Environments: Scoping Review
Smart Glasses for Caring Situations in Complex Care Environments: Scoping Review
Background
Anesthesia departments and intensive care units represent two advanced, high-tech, and complex care environments. Health care in those environments involves ...
Care models for Individuals with Chronic Multimorbidity: Elements, Impact, Implementation Challenges and Facilitators
Care models for Individuals with Chronic Multimorbidity: Elements, Impact, Implementation Challenges and Facilitators
Abstract
Background
Patients with multiple long-term conditions requires specialized care models to manage their complex health needs. Understanding the existing care mode...
776 Quality Improvement in Prehospital Burn Care
776 Quality Improvement in Prehospital Burn Care
Abstract
Introduction
Burn center implemented a new quality improvement program with emergency medical services (EMS) that exami...
Building Primary Palliative Care Capacity Through Education at a National Level: Pallium Canada and its LEAP Courses
Building Primary Palliative Care Capacity Through Education at a National Level: Pallium Canada and its LEAP Courses
Background All the palliative care needs of a population cannot be met by specialist palliative care clinicians and teams alone. Both primary-level and specialist-level palliative ...

