Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Efficacy and safety of milnacipran 100 mg/day in patients with fibromyalgia: Results of a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial

View through CrossRef
AbstractObjectiveTo assess the efficacy and safety of milnacipran at a dosage of 100 mg/day (50 mg twice daily) for monotherapy treatment of fibromyalgia.MethodsA double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial was performed to assess 1,025 patients with fibromyalgia who were randomized to receive milnacipran 100 mg/day (n = 516) or placebo (n = 509). Patients underwent 4–6 weeks of flexible dose escalation followed by 12 weeks of stable‐dose treatment. Two composite responder definitions were used as primary end points to classify the response to treatment. The 2‐measure composite response required achievement of ≥30% improvement from baseline in the pain score and a rating of “very much improved” or “much improved” on the Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scale. The 3‐measure composite response required satisfaction of these same 2 improvement criteria for pain and global status as well as improvement in physical function on the Short Form 36 (SF‐36) physical component summary (PCS) score.ResultsAfter 12 weeks of stable‐dose treatment, a significantly greater proportion of milnacipran‐treated patients compared with placebo‐treated patients showed clinically meaningful improvements, as evidenced by the proportion of patients meeting the 2‐measure composite responder criteria (P < 0.001 in the baseline observation carried forward [BOCF] analysis) and 3‐measure composite responder criteria (P < 0.001 in the BOCF). Milnacipran‐treated patients also demonstrated significantly greater improvements from baseline on multiple secondary outcomes, including 24‐hour and weekly recall pain score, PGIC score, SF‐36 PCS and mental component summary scores, average pain severity score on the Brief Pain Inventory, Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire total score (all P < 0.001 versus placebo), and Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory total score (P = 0.036 versus placebo). Milnacipran was well tolerated by most patients, with nausea being the most commonly reported adverse event (placebo‐adjusted rate of 15.8%).ConclusionMilnacipran administered at a dosage of 100 mg/day improved pain, global status, fatigue, and physical and mental function in patients with fibromyalgia.
Title: Efficacy and safety of milnacipran 100 mg/day in patients with fibromyalgia: Results of a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial
Description:
AbstractObjectiveTo assess the efficacy and safety of milnacipran at a dosage of 100 mg/day (50 mg twice daily) for monotherapy treatment of fibromyalgia.
MethodsA double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial was performed to assess 1,025 patients with fibromyalgia who were randomized to receive milnacipran 100 mg/day (n = 516) or placebo (n = 509).
Patients underwent 4–6 weeks of flexible dose escalation followed by 12 weeks of stable‐dose treatment.
Two composite responder definitions were used as primary end points to classify the response to treatment.
The 2‐measure composite response required achievement of ≥30% improvement from baseline in the pain score and a rating of “very much improved” or “much improved” on the Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scale.
The 3‐measure composite response required satisfaction of these same 2 improvement criteria for pain and global status as well as improvement in physical function on the Short Form 36 (SF‐36) physical component summary (PCS) score.
ResultsAfter 12 weeks of stable‐dose treatment, a significantly greater proportion of milnacipran‐treated patients compared with placebo‐treated patients showed clinically meaningful improvements, as evidenced by the proportion of patients meeting the 2‐measure composite responder criteria (P < 0.
001 in the baseline observation carried forward [BOCF] analysis) and 3‐measure composite responder criteria (P < 0.
001 in the BOCF).
Milnacipran‐treated patients also demonstrated significantly greater improvements from baseline on multiple secondary outcomes, including 24‐hour and weekly recall pain score, PGIC score, SF‐36 PCS and mental component summary scores, average pain severity score on the Brief Pain Inventory, Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire total score (all P < 0.
001 versus placebo), and Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory total score (P = 0.
036 versus placebo).
Milnacipran was well tolerated by most patients, with nausea being the most commonly reported adverse event (placebo‐adjusted rate of 15.
8%).
ConclusionMilnacipran administered at a dosage of 100 mg/day improved pain, global status, fatigue, and physical and mental function in patients with fibromyalgia.

Related Results

Evolution of Antimicrobial Resistance in Community vs. Hospital-Acquired Infections
Evolution of Antimicrobial Resistance in Community vs. Hospital-Acquired Infections
Abstract Introduction Hospitals are high-risk environments for infections. Despite the global recognition of these pathogens, few studies compare microorganisms from community-acqu...
Current therapeutic strategies for erectile function recovery after radical prostatectomy – literature review and meta-analysis
Current therapeutic strategies for erectile function recovery after radical prostatectomy – literature review and meta-analysis
Radical prostatectomy is the most commonly performed treatment option for localised prostate cancer. In the last decades the surgical technique has been improved and modified in or...
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract Introduction Tarlatamab is a Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) -directed bispecific T-cell engager recently approved for use in patients with advanced small cell lung cancer (SCL...
Impact of Migraine on Symptoms of Fibromyalgia
Impact of Migraine on Symptoms of Fibromyalgia
Objective: To determine the frequency of fibromyalgia in patients of migraine and to see the impact of migraine on symptomsof fibromyalgia.Study Design: Cross sectional study.Place...
Evaluation of Carisbamate for the Treatment of Migraine in a Randomized, Double‐Blind Trial
Evaluation of Carisbamate for the Treatment of Migraine in a Randomized, Double‐Blind Trial
Objective.— This study explored the dose‐response relationship of carisbamate administered at doses of 100 mg per day, 300 mg per day, or 600 mg per day, in the...
Evaluation of the Fibromyalgia and Related Risk Factors in Patients with Advanced Kidney Failure Undergoing Hemodialysis
Evaluation of the Fibromyalgia and Related Risk Factors in Patients with Advanced Kidney Failure Undergoing Hemodialysis
Background : Fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) is defined as widespread and persistent pain in the musculoskeletal system. There are limited reports regarding the prevalence of fibromyal...

Back to Top